The Oresrians are not, in fact, another name for the Thargoids. They are another species altogether. The Dark Wheel describes them as almost alike, but having different markings on their thorax, and a different shape of the fourth joint on the hind legs. Supposedly, mistaking them for the Thargoids will really anger them, so it's a bad idea. I'm not sure if your referring to the Oresrians as being another name for the Thargoids, but if you aren't, please don't take offense. I'm pretty sure my information is accurate, as I've just read The Dark Wheel this morning, and I'm looking at the PDF book right now.
Alright, so here's the problem with that. The world of the original Elite is essentially non-canon at this point (as are sources like Oolite & friends). They feature worlds that no longer exist, a wealth of sentient space-faring species (E: D currently has only humans & the former species the Imperials wiped out when claiming Achenar), descriptions of ship exteriors & paths through Witchspace/Faraway. (This pains me, having also read The Dark Wheel last night.) We're not even sure what parts of F:E & F:FE are canon anymore, given that all we have is GalNet & flavor text.
Reading through Drew Wagar's posts on his blog give a sense of how far he, the other authors & the FDev writing staff have gone to create a coherent galaxy & backstory. If that's to be trusted, then "Out Of Darkness" should be nearly as canon as the game itself (or as the game was in pre-Alpha/Alpha). So, spoiler alert.
"Out Of Darkness talks at length about the Oresrians through the discourse of a highly-educated, highly-intellectual man who's formed an alliance with them. Carl (the primary antogonist) speaks about their history & intelligence. He informs another character (and us, by proxy) that the "Thargoids" are actually two groups/factions of (roughly) the same species: the Oresrians & the Klaxians. He makes a specific point of that they are both "Thargoids" . And the Klaxians are made to be aggressive - "...The Klaxians already push into Oresrian space, seeking to expand..." Source is Loc 5337 of the Kindle e-book.
The book also features two close-quarters encounters with the Oresrians & gives us some backstory on Peregrina (if you followed the old thread, it appears to have nothing to do with the community's tests with the UA).
If I could summon a Brookes for clarification, I would. I'd also ask "Do UA still appear in signal sources (perhaps not the same locations) in 1.3?"
I also wish we could ask Kerrash: "Having confirmed there's Morse in the UA's sound, is further audio analysis worthwhile or are the clues located elsewhere?"
Huge thank you Kerrash, and yes a tiny hint may be very helpful at this point!
With massive thanks to Wishblend (rep+), I've finished cutting up the recordings needed to complete the alphabet (linked here ).
Originally Posted by Kerrash:
BTW Are we even sure it is morse code?
Um, didn't he just do that?
Seems to me that's a hint that morse code it is probably not...
You were very lucky then as for me when I tried to do it they just instantly went for me with scanners. Also I hope you have an good ship for holding it with correct modules now.Alright, just tested the Nav Beacon theory in Jita Ten. Dropped into the Nav beacon, destroyed the beacon itself, jettisoned the UA. I let it go through the sound cycle at least twice (~75% health left on the UA). There was no effect. None of the local ships in the Nav beacon instance seemed to care, no crazy ships (or Feds chasing me) dropped it. I scooped it back up & left.
Mr Tree,
For referance, from the time you eject the ua to the time you collect it back up
If you have a timer with 4 mins, that will leave you around 35% / 37% left on the ua.
Wishblend
Seems to me that's a hint that morse code it is probably not...
Several of wishblends recordings are outside bodies in uninhabited systems (i.e no nav beacons and stations).This, +1. Just getting caught up on the thread after a week or so away, and while I admire the persistence of the audio folks, I thought we had "found" the morse code some time ago, and discounted it as the background noise being picked up from nav beacons and stations that broadcast their names/locations?
Originally Posted by Kerrash:
BTW Are we even sure it is morse code?
I'm waiting for the EKURU A 1 recording from Wishblend. The chittering, if not morse, is definitely based off it. If I was wrong about that at all, there's no way I could've navigated the recordings by Wishblend to pull out the remaining symbols.
- - - Updated - - -
Several of wishblends recordings are outside bodies in uninhabited systems (i.e no nav beacons and stations).
Ahh I said I'd give you a hand if you wanted. =p
Great job though!
I kept seeing Trinkets a few weeks back, didn't realise they might be important, I'll try to snag some.
Again, not to discount all the work you folks and Wishblend are doing, but is there not a chance you are just hearing what you want to hear? You know the name of the system or station, so are just hearing the dots and dashes you want in the chittering? In effect, you are starting with the "message" and working backwards to "hear" it in the chittering?
Did you see Kerrash's follow up post???
It's morse, you can tell by listening to it.
"Aaaaah but it might not be morse, have you thought of that!"
"Yeah but are you SURE??"
"Yeah but are you REALLY SURE because IT MIGHT NOT BE!"
It's bloody morse!
Again, not to discount all the work you folks and Wishblend are doing, but is there not a chance you are just hearing what you want to hear? You know the name of the system or station, so are just hearing the dots and dashes you want in the chittering? In effect, you are starting with the "message" and working backwards to "hear" it in the chittering?
Not entirely convinced yet, but this is is the best ED thread for bl00dy ages so thanks for that folks!
Well you can listen to it yourself and make your own mind up : https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=162998&page=6&p=2490413&viewfull=1#post2490413
Sorry, none of those show up in the Galaxy Map when copy-pasted in.[/COLOR]Captain N said:I really need to go to work but I was curious so I did a run through all the ROT-N's using: http://rumkin.com/tools/cipher/caesar.php
The most promising was ROT-7:
ALDLAAR
ALWAX
LAKALLY
LAELM
Don't seem to mean anything in English at least, but at least they're halfway pronounceable.
System names? Someone else check, I'm off.