Have you explained what to listen to? About the chittering? Because the UA emits different sounds, and the chittering one is very hard to distinguish. The simil-morse was already proven and reproduced as well. The fact that it is not conventional morse does not mean that it is not morse at all. Because we can hear it in every recording, and a lot of people have decoded it already. You can do morse while farting: it is not a "bip" but it is morse too...
Unknown Artefact (or artifact) Community Thread - The Canonn
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
- Status
Have you explained what to listen to? About the chittering? Because the UA emits different sounds, and the chittering one is very hard to distinguish. The simil-morse was already proven and reproduced as well. The fact that it is not conventional morse does not mean that it is not morse at all. Because we can hear it in every recording, and a lot of people have decoded it already. You can do morse while farting: it is not a "bip" but it is morse too...
Yes. Normal Recordings look like this:
But this one looks like this:
Notice the visual difference. Only 2-3 Purrs, instead of 6-7.
I forgot the time line in the new picture. The whole thing happens in 2:30.
Last edited:
Yes, please, can someone morse capable, decode the second chittering? PLEASE?
Can you point me at a specific example of what you're talking about please, at work but on dinner, I'll give it a go.
Last edited:
Morse has been confirmed by literally digging into the game files.
Not to mention the consistent results found by a huge effort on the part of a number of users across many recordings.
I took this:
From this video(beginning at about 10:00:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtqJTOgPrps&t=10m48s
This is definitely the first time i had such a result. I have tested about 20 sample recording and always had 6-7 purrs( often well hidden). But this one is different.
The pause between the purrs is MUCH bigger. The chitter seems to be longer, too.
Note again this picture:
4 Howls in 2:30. But about 26 Purrs. The new one also has 4 howls, but only 8-10 purrs.
I always had the feeling that if the text message in the morse code is too long, there are tendentially less purrs.
Last edited:
The first UA was found in 109 virginis but I didn't manage to retrieve it, then redwizard found and managed to retrieve one in his system.
Kulin;2534699 From this video(beginning at about 10:00: [URL said:
Yes that one!
And have you noticed that other container, perhaps the sap8 one, that LIGHTS UP with a round yellow light right in the middle of the canister's edge?
It strongly lights up then it lights off (at 11:26!).
What's that? Are all the normal canisters supposed to light up light that?
Last edited:
Sounds like this is a step in the right direction, give us one code that is breakable as it is morse of the system we are in.
Then use the same code to give a clue when the item is "activated".
Then use the same code to give a clue when the item is "activated".
Last edited:
here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtqJTOgPrps&t=10m30s
Starting from then, please try to decript every chittering you ear, not just the first one, also the others that occur after
Last edited:
Also guys with the UA, as part of your testing did you find which of the items you floated with the UA has caused it to make this new sound?
Guessing the SAP core but worth being sure.
Guessing the SAP core but worth being sure.
Okay, this is going to be a good one...
Who currently has a UA + SAP8 AND is Explorer Elite?
If you're Explorer Elite and have both a UA and SAP8, then find a BB and take the "Obfuscation On The Outer Rim" mission.
I wonder if having the UA and SAP8 along with the crystals of the mission make something different happen.
Who currently has a UA + SAP8 AND is Explorer Elite?
If you're Explorer Elite and have both a UA and SAP8, then find a BB and take the "Obfuscation On The Outer Rim" mission.
I wonder if having the UA and SAP8 along with the crystals of the mission make something different happen.
That's what i said some posts ago...
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=162998&page=95&p=2534229&viewfull=1#post2534229
I support this! UA + sap8 + Elite Explorer -> "Obfuscation On The Outer Rim" mission.
And, just to be sure, a whole new LONG recording with sap8 and UA close together, with at least two or tree chittering one after the other
Zenith: aren't you ELITE Explorer? let them borrow you the UA and sap8
Last edited:
Ah, you guys are talking about the "inbetween purrs"?
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=162998&p=2503227&viewfull=1#post2503227
I don't think those seem to be morse, I'll give them another listen in this video.
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=162998&p=2503227&viewfull=1#post2503227
I don't think those seem to be morse, I'll give them another listen in this video.
I'm talking about the usual chittering, but to understand if two consequential ones are the same or not.
Do the ... arms ... on the UA usually glow like that?
As an aside, I listened to the second youtube link. Sleipnir A 1. No other chittering, but interesting that it exhibited the slowest purrs yet.
As a further aside, here's a graph of binary data.
Except this ISN'T analysis of the purrs. This is generated by a program I wrote which generates a random number between 0 and 255, only counts those WITHOUT sequences of three or more consecutive bits, randomly (50/50) truncates those to 5 or 6 bits by shifting right 2 or 3 bits and then tallies them up. If you run it for 111 valid binary sequences you get the chart above.
If you run it for MANY cycles, you get distinct tiers of tally, but for shorter data samples (like we have for the UA) it repeatedly produces graphs like the above - which looks like English letter distribution, but in this case clearly isn't as it's random.
That's not to say the purrs aren't slow-coded binary representations of characters, and I do wish that the purrs comes out to mean SOMETHING (as it's TOO binary-like), but I did a lot of analysis during the previous thread and only ever got gibberish when trying character substitution from the data that we acquired.
It is compelling when you compare the frequencies to standard letter frequencies, but that's what made me think to actually check the results of 5-and-6 bit random run-length-limited data and see what the graph looked like, and the results were a touch disappointing as they didn't just look "random" as I expected.
As an aside, I listened to the second youtube link. Sleipnir A 1. No other chittering, but interesting that it exhibited the slowest purrs yet.
As a further aside, here's a graph of binary data.
Except this ISN'T analysis of the purrs. This is generated by a program I wrote which generates a random number between 0 and 255, only counts those WITHOUT sequences of three or more consecutive bits, randomly (50/50) truncates those to 5 or 6 bits by shifting right 2 or 3 bits and then tallies them up. If you run it for 111 valid binary sequences you get the chart above.
If you run it for MANY cycles, you get distinct tiers of tally, but for shorter data samples (like we have for the UA) it repeatedly produces graphs like the above - which looks like English letter distribution, but in this case clearly isn't as it's random.
That's not to say the purrs aren't slow-coded binary representations of characters, and I do wish that the purrs comes out to mean SOMETHING (as it's TOO binary-like), but I did a lot of analysis during the previous thread and only ever got gibberish when trying character substitution from the data that we acquired.
It is compelling when you compare the frequencies to standard letter frequencies, but that's what made me think to actually check the results of 5-and-6 bit random run-length-limited data and see what the graph looked like, and the results were a touch disappointing as they didn't just look "random" as I expected.
Here's the morse reddit link,
i CCleaner'd last night ill dig up the forum links now...
https://www.reddit.com/r/morse/comments/3d47nb/mighty_morse_enthusiasts_could_you_spare_abit_of/
- Status