Unknown Artefact (or artifact) Community Thread - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
OK - I deliberately didn't view your the spoiler until I'd had a go at the translation.

The first part was very difficult but I got the following about 1 quarter of the way in.

5FRORGGUB103A

Which to anyone who doesn't know morse code would look like complete nonsense but actually is very close to your deduction considering how close a G is to Z (must have missed a dit (twice)) and the FRO, di di dah dit - di dah dit - dah dah dah could also be my mistakes as SECT di di dit - dit - dah di dah dit - dah is very close to FRO . . . . I've not done this in 20 years but warming up fast.

So I concur with what you state as the translation in the spoiler.

Heh!

Bonus points for getting the A on the end. =)

It was by B17-3A which I think is the main star because it's a two star system designated A & B.

God forbid we have to do one of these blind.
 
EDIT: Ah, this took me too long to write on my dodgy internet connection. Will leave it here anyway, in case I need to link some of the rationale ever again :)

So, I pitched the idea of morse a long time back, but it didn't get traction, nor did I have the resources to push through. After seeing suggestion it was "coming back into consideration", I repushed the idea with the help of others and is now pretty accepted. With that said, let me explain a few things, and how they've come about which might clear things up.

- Firstly, since you haven't read the whole thread, here's the alphabet I produced from the UA chittering. That alphabet is derived from a collection of recordings from the community (mostly Wishblend and Ratking's), who helpfully recorded the UA at enough different places to provide the whole alphabet and numbers. The critical thing with the alphabet is that if I was wrong at all with extracting the letters, there is no way I would've been able to come up with an alphabet, as it took over 20 recordings to do, in some cases extracting a single audio cut. But I was able to spot it almost first go every time.

(PS Wishblend, if I have to listen to COL 285 SECTOR in UA chitter ever again, I'm gonna get all hulk up in here.... ;) )

- Next, I verified the accuracy of this alphabet by using it to synthesise a signal for EKURU A 1 , a location which had not yet been recorded. After producing this, Wishblend went off and recorded the UA outside EKURU A 1. Although not a perfect replication (due to the variances that can occur in each recording), it's structurally identical, which is as close a proof as you can get.

- Some of those variances are in pitch and tone, but again, they are structurally the same. Some variances are also from the actual morse encoded version itself. If you listen to the "P" sample, it's *almost* nothing like an actual morse P. This is why the various morse-decoding software this has been passed through doesn't detect anything. It'd be like taking Chinese text and expecting sense when you pass it through a Japanese text decoder. Their scripts are similar, but they aren't the same. However..

- It's not *strictly* morse. It's much easier for everyone to just call it morse, rather than what it actually is; a stylised variation of morse. If you're listening for *pure* morse, or even distorted morse (where the signals are the same, but just distorted slightly) you won't hear it. It's probably much more accurate to say this is something *based* off morse, as my initial work assumed it was morse *with variance* in it. Thus, the issues with the P sound.

- Other variations that can occur is, for example, that a "dit" is sometimes a "wip", "wup" or "dat" sound (the 'dat' is really uncommon and only appears in a few letters). This is best heard in the cuts for "5" (dit dit dit dit dit) and "4" (dit dit dit dit dah). In the recordings, respectively, they sound more like "wip wip wip" and "wip wip warp".

- The best way to explain this is as a language effect rule, similar to what we do with the english language. "Phone" contains "P" (pee) and "H" (aich), but these are not heard when you pronounce the word phone. In this case, they make a "fuh" sound. But just because you don't hear a "Pee" or an "aich" doesn't mean it's not present. I think similar rules might apply to the "morse", for example, three or more sequential dits will follow a "high-low-high..." sequence. That said, it's not something I'm willing to put effort in to breaking down, nor am capable of doing it.
I hope that helps. I know there will be people out here who will never be convinced it's morse, and if I could go back in time and somehow pitch it in a way that didn't claim it was morse, but instead based off morse (and thus, can be decoded like morse) I might have, because people do go listening for morse (like in the nav beacons) and can't hear it, nor can software detect it, and so think it isn't.

I hear it, the pitch and rhythm of morse is there - It's morse, and only a human could detect it. I now agree completely.
I'm happy to have a go at verifying translations if needed.
 
Agreed, this seems like something worth exploring at some point. Personally, if the FSD failure theory leads to a dead end I'd quite like to see this tested somehow. Should only need a few samples at the extreme ends of civilized space to rule it out (or as far as UA owners want to fly). If there's no change in the 6 extreme points on the bubble (or at a minimum toward/away from the core), then beyond flying out 1k ly in each direction, it'll give a fair indication of whether or not it's not going to change.

Incidentally, one fun property of the codes I found is that if you strip out all those that contain runs >2 of the same "bit" as QorbeQ did, again counting up from 0-255 but constrain the codes to 6 bit sequences, you're left with exactly 26 unique 6-bit codes. Not really good enough to contain a message though, unless you want to send messages "enttirelywithoutspaces".


Waay to obvious - but - there are 26 letters in the alphabet - are they teaching us how to read?
 
noo! missed it :(
the mass lock trick didn't work, it jumped before the escort even though they scattered and I stayed right on the t-9's tail
oh well back to hunting
 
noo! missed it :(
the mass lock trick didn't work, it jumped before the escort even though they scattered and I stayed right on the t-9's tail
oh well back to hunting

noooo! Didn't you equip a Wake Scanner?! It should be possible to follow them, or am I wrong?
The mass lock trick did not work because they high waked to another system perhaps?
 
Last edited:
When its plain to see its purpose is not being finished because you wont let it do what its desgined to do.

Let the UA's finish what they are supposed to do.

You probably missed my reply to you last night. Here it is again:
Why are you assuming the UAs that Ratking and mrtree have are the last two? There is no evidence that posters here are the only players with UAs. IMO it is very likely that other players who haven't seen this thread (and probably don't even know this forum exists) have UAs. If there is even one more UA out there then letting the two we have destroy themselves would be a huge mistake: we wouldn't have even tested your theory and we'd have no UAs left.

From a meta point of view it makes no sense that FD would set up a trigger that would require all players to coordinate their actions; the chances of that happening are very low. What would happen if someone had a UA on their ship and stopped playing? Mystery progress blocked indefinitely? It's also illogical from a game point of view. We can let our UAs go, but about those that have been sold? What justification is there for assuming that those UAs have been destroyed?
 
Is it in supercruise?

Atre you in open?

yeah I'm in open but no wake scanner
FGPyPuE.jpg
x2nzCZr.jpg
 
If your in open wing me i have a frame wake scanner, probably gone by now though =(

yeah too late didn't think of that left the instance already :(
at least we know they still exist now, its my 3rd time hunting been at it for a few days now happy to have seen a glimpse of one :D
 
Last edited:
Oh well, the one that got away. =(

So did you do anything out of the ordinary?

Or just hanging around in deep space waiting for SSSs?

No missions taken out or anything like that?

Just for reference, depending on approach, ideally I think you need.

Wake scanner (if you're planning to follow, I belive the T9 normally jumps first)
Interdictor (probably) to subsequently pull it out of SC
Hatch breakers

Sometimes you can only get two dumps of cargo before the hatch is at 0% and what you want is then "stuck" inside, I think hatch breaker is the only way at this point.
 
Last edited:
Oh well, the one that got away. =(

So did you do anything out of the ordinary?

Or just hanging around in deep space waiting for SSSs?

No missions taken out or anything like that?

Just for reference, depending on approach, ideally I think you need.

Wake scanner
Interdictor (to subsequently pull it out of SC)
Hatch breakers

Sometimes you can only get two dumps of cargo before the hatch is at 0% and what you want is still inside, I think hatch breaker is the only way at this point.

no nothing special, just hanging around in deep space waiting for SSS to pop up
 
if you're tapping your foot at about 160bpm then the dahs will be at each down beat, the dits are always half that, or 8th notes, like 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and, doing both the down and up beat.
 
Has anybody tried turning off their fsd and trying to jump with a u.a in the cargo bay? Maybe the module damage is just "nanites" connecting to your systems. :)
 
I'm in Timocani and i'll join the search for a bit but i'm gonna stop and go earn some quick cash afterwards so i can get a clipper
 
I'm pretty sure I've posted this before, but oh well, I'll do it again.

The constant "buzzing" sound through out all recordings is (scientific pitch notation) F#4, or the F# above middle C on a standard 88 key piano.

The "whale song" alternates between two different sequences. F#4 and E4. The next is D4, G#4, (F4, very quickly), then back to D4.

For the second 3 note sequence, I'm not exactly sure if I'm actually hearing that F4 between the G#4 and the D4.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_pitch_notation

Taking a quick peak at the above link, we see that the constant F#4 is 369.99hz.

The two note sequence is F#4 to E4, so 369.99hz to 329.63hz

The three note sequence is D4, G#4, F4, D4, or 293.66hz, 415.3hz, 349.23hz back to 293.66hz

I had the thought that maybe the 3 note sequence could be 3d coordinates in the galaxy map, though I haven't tested it yet. I'm pretty sure the primary notes I'm hearing are in the 4th octave, which if we were to go by those frequencies, then those coordinates wouldn't be very far away from Sol, being 0,0,0.

I'm thinking that since D4 is repeated, it would be the first number in the coordinate sequence. But, if I am in fact imagining that F4 in the sound, then we'd still have 293, 415, 293.

Someone tell me if I've gone crazy and need to go to sleep.


edit: I just noticed while looking at the references on that Scientific Pitch Notation wiki this lovely little nugget: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/09sep_blackholesounds/

"Sound waves 57 octaves lower than middle-C are rumbling away from a supermassive black hole in
the Perseus cluster."
 
Last edited:
Awesome, I was asking a while back if anyone with a decent ear knew the notes and specific frequencies of the wail.

Difficult to know what to do with it but having it there is a start. =)

There are also some notes that seem to appear between the purrs now and again, they seem more pitch related than length ie note rather than morse, these ones are harder to make out I think and although I think there's only a limited number of f=variations, there are more variations than the howl's 2.

It might seem a stretch but I honestly would not be suprised if these notes are somehow important, the audio guys are no doubt well trained in music and we have suspicious looking missions called "The Silent Song of the Spheres".
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom