Astronomy / Space NASA seeks to hide the truth about the secret inter planitary space missions and area 90 whatever.

What do you think is going on?

  • Secret missions to Planet X to sell our precious juices

    Votes: 4 16.0%

  • Alien invaders of Earth, on a recon mission

    Votes: 5 20.0%

  • Secret tapes of Obama and the Queen looking like Lizards

    Votes: 2 8.0%

  • Secret tapes of Palen and Bush 3 looking like Lizards.

    Votes: 6 24.0%

  • Secret stash of cash which Bankers don't want us to know about.

    Votes: 1 4.0%

  • Minor solar object magnificed by the Earth

    Votes: 7 28.0%
  • Total voters
    25

Defacto

Defacto
That's just Johnson and his Wanderer going up again. You're not s'posed to keep the MPD Thruster firing while in atmo, it can cut some sensitive electronics. You have the dry-boosters and the airbreathing mode for that. Johnson never cares, though. A real tramp freighter pilot, that one.

I don't see why you land-turtles get so superstitious. At this rate, you'd believe the year was 1926 and Goddard a Martian. Gee.
 

Patrick_68000

Patrick_68000
Cody said:
A poll? In the astronomy section? Wonders never cease!
Click to expand...

I intend to make a poll with the following question : "In which stellar system you would like to live ?" - With 400 billion of checkboxes. I count on your participation

:)
 
Last edited:

Cody

Cody
I note that New Horizons lost contact with NASA yesterday, and put itself into safe-mode for eighty minutes.
 

Alien

Alien
I think it's probably space debris. NASA probably cut the video for two reasons: a) They knew conspiracy theorists would claim they're UFOs ... b) There's more space debris up there than NASA want to admit. If people did know just how much is up there, there'd be pressure on NASA to clean it all up, and that's billions of dollars spent for no actual gain, far better to keep quiet about it, which is probably why NASA doesn't counter the claims they're UFOs.

If NASA really wanted to hide UFOs, why let the footage get out at all? It's on a delay, so they could have cut the live feed before it went out. I don't believe someone there looked up at the screen from doing the crossword and went "Oh crap, better cut the feed quick!". To quote Ros from Monsters Inc, someone's always watching.
 
Last edited:

el_tel

el_tel
Why is there audio in that video clip? Did The Independent add it in to give it a more 'alien' vibe?
 

Brimstone

Brimstone
Thank god Art Bell is coming back to radio July 20th (Internet radio) to continue his career as THE weirdo late night alien abduction men in black Mel's hole paranormal talk show, so he can talk about this.

"And now, from the kingdom of Nigh..."
 

Defacto

Defacto
Dizzy B High said:
Well if it was a hoax those footprints that appeared to be on the moon aren't actually on the moon.
Click to expand...

Actually, because NASA wanted their moon hoax to be as perfect as possible, they constructed a secret spaceship to ferry Armstrong, Aldrin, and the one I forget the name of to the moon, so that the recordings for the fake moon landing could be done there.
The truth is out there!
 

CMDR Malkov

C
Defacto said:
Actually, because NASA wanted their moon hoax to be as perfect as possible, they constructed a secret spaceship to ferry Armstrong, Aldrin, and the one I forget the name of to the moon, so that the recordings for the fake moon landing could be done there.
The truth is out there!
Click to expand...
There is no moon...
 

Surfinjo

Surfinjo
You gotta love Buzz Aldrin.

Pairing him with Ali G was pure genius.

- - - Updated - - -

Zieman said:
I generally dislike violence, but that jerk had it coming. Go Buzz!
Click to expand...

If ever there was some jerk attacking poor innocent Buzz's fist with his agressive face, this was it.
 

Alien

Alien
The question isn't whether NASA has landed men on the Moon, because that can be proved by pointing a laser at a specific spot where there are reflectors, which can only be there if we put them there. The question is whether NASA landed Apollo 11 on the Moon on July 20th 1969, and for me the undeniable proof is that Russia was watching and did not make any claims that NASA had faked it.

But you can't convince conspiracy theorists that it simply happened as depicted by NASA, because they'll always have a "yes, but ..." answer to everything.

EDIT: From Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories#Retroreflectors

Retroreflectors

Apollo 11 retroreflector, still with its protective cover
The presence of retroreflectors (mirrors used as targets for Earth-based tracking lasers) from the Laser Ranging Retroreflector Experiment (LRRR) is evidence that there were landings.[192] Lick Observatory attempted to detect from Apollo 11's retroreflector while Armstrong and Aldrin were still on the Moon but did not succeed until August 1, 1969.[193] The Apollo 14 astronauts deployed a retroreflector on February 5, 1971, and McDonald Observatory detected it the same day. The Apollo 15 retroreflector was deployed on July 31, 1971, and was detected by McDonald Observatory within a few days.[194] Smaller retroreflectors were also put on the Moon by the Russians; they were attached to the unmanned lunar rovers Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2.[195]
Click to expand...

NOTE: Lick Observatory detected Apollo 11's Retroreflector on August 1st 1969
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom