News Peek of the Week

Check out one of the surface defense 'Skimmers' that will be coming in Planetary Landings, the first installment of Elite Dangerous: Horizons.

https://d393fwdi1vc8it.cloudfront.net/Gunner.jpg

It looks similar to a Tesla Drone:
https://www.behance.net/gallery/29491253/The-Tesla-Drone

eb106a29491253.55f6198a2d7ad.png
 
Hmm, this 'Peek of the Week' seems to have been 'Peek of the Month'.
How about a new one FD?.... or am I completely missing something here. :(
 
If you look closely the rings have some kind of blue energy field stuff flowing inside them. So they are not fans. And I think I read somewhere that they only operate close to the ground which sugest they depend on some planetary factor that is not air. Which only leaves gravity. So with the information provided I believe these are complicated propulsion systems that transform gravity into force and reverse the flow, or something like that.
 
Sorry for the double post but I have to say that I was wrong. If it used gravity to propel itself then whats to stop it from fling to the moon on earths gravity or the oposite. Asuming it must stay close to the surface, I conclude that it can only be magnetically propeling itself against the surface or doing something simular wich we have yet to understand with modern science. This explains everything... until Frontier says otherwise.
 
No, it's probably an placeholder just to illustrate that there will be a hologram in it and for this looking not so boring as without.
I hope this is temporary
Now we have the same interface on all ships and it would be quite wrong that interface installed in ground vehicles. The game now is so much sameness. I think that the various manufacturing companies would use their unique holographic interfaces, especially for ships and vehicles for different purposes.
I hope that the ground vehicles will be a different interface.
 
The instrumentation works perfectly for a ground vehicle. Why do something different, when it works? There is not really a better way for a scanner to tell position, distance and elevation difference in a single picture. The picture of the rover tells you, where you are hit and the other scanner shows the target... it is by all means a good interface you are already used to. It is not a placeholder for sure. It might see some variation (as it already did) but in general that is what we get, i think. And i like it.
 
The instrumentation works perfectly for a ground vehicle. Why do something different, when it works?
For a variety of game. At least for a picture of our eyes sometimes change. Developers can make the same easy to use interface, but slightly different, though using different colors and icons.
 
Not sure if "anti-grav" .. We MIGHT be looking at mixed flow impeller ... bladeless fan here?
In an airless environment, a thruster technology giving reaction thrust off exhaust gases?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8he8afjQyd8


I doubt very much that we'll have VTOL craft based on Dyson's bladeless air coolers. Dyson's sales patter sounded a little suspect, especially when he mentioned "viscous shearing" as if normal fans didn't drag air along with it as well. And that remark about the "slap in the face" felt a little like a... well... slap in the face. I also get the feeling that pressure pulses on your skin my be more efficient for evaporating sweat, which is how fans cool you down.

Because I was sure I could hear a bladed fan noise I suspected there was a bladed fan in the base. So I Googled the phrase "dyson's bladless fan has got blades" and got back...

http://hackaday.com/2009/10/14/it-has-blades-dysons-little-white-lie/

The design supposedly amplifies the air movement fifteen times, but we’re skeptical about that figure as there’s no energy-saving claim to go along with such an incredible power boost. One thing is certain, you will NOT get a fan without blades for your sterling… just one with hidden blades plus a huge marketing campaign.

I'm not saying that the fan design is bad. Hiding blades from inquisitive little fingers is a great idea. I'm just saying that his design is more to minimise the loss you'd get from hiding the fan in the base, and less to do with "amplifying" the power of the fan.

We're not going to get Dyson Fan aircraft.
 
The "FA Off" on the hud could be not a mistake: I can imagine some kind of vertical thrusters on the SRV to assist it to stick as much as possible to the ground in case of (very) low G. Switch to FA Off, and the SRV could then be able to jump or bounce more easily, but consequently would be harder to control.
 
Back
Top Bottom