There is so much of that on both sides here, it's a drop in the bucket.
The players complaining about mode switching are also a tiny drop in the bucket of total players, so that bit is accurate, right Boo?
There is so much of that on both sides here, it's a drop in the bucket.
It wasn't, it was just a way of being insulting without triggering an infraction from a Mod.
The players complaining about mode switching are also a tiny drop in the bucket of total players, so that bit is accurate, right Boo?
It's not really mind reading when it is out in the open for everyone to read, just saying.There is so much of that on both sides here, it's a drop in the bucket.
I thought I wanted open PVE but it'd really just split the community up. I think everyone should be mashed together, pvers, pvpers, xboxers and pcers. The universe is very very big, and there isn't many of us to fill it. I found open pve by simply walking the paths less travelled. I know I could run into a player at any time, which is better than playing solo, but I feel safe also so it's the best of both worlds.
What does that have to do with either comment?
Indeed. And this works very well as an argument against the need to merge as well. Those who do not want PvP can easily move away from core system and play in more remote regions. Its even a bonus for traders, since those remote regions are less exploited, meaning good profits to be had. The downside wuld be, those hankering for PvP would keep an eye on forums/reddit/etc to see where they are playing, and hunt them down. A a minor annoyance for the PvPers but with an ultimatre win, but a major annoynce for the PvEers who are just trying to avoid PvP.
That was my question to you, but you didn't answer.
It's not really mind reading when it is out in the open for everyone to read, just saying.
What does that have to do with either comment?
I thought I wanted open PVE but it'd really just split the community up. I think everyone should be mashed together, pvers, pvpers, xboxers and pcers. The universe is very very big, and there isn't many of us to fill it. I found open pve by simply walking the paths less travelled. I know I could run into a player at any time, which is better than playing solo, but I feel safe also so it's the best of both worlds.
What? Is it asking too much that people follow the conversation before replying? Can we at least do that?
I'm not really obligated to answer all of your posts, and when all its going to result in is in an endless back and forth what's the point? Accept the statement or don't.
I thought I wanted open PVE but it'd really just split the community up. I think everyone should be mashed together, pvers, pvpers, xboxers and pcers. The universe is very very big, and there isn't many of us to fill it. I found open pve by simply walking the paths less travelled. I know I could run into a player at any time, which is better than playing solo, but I feel safe also so it's the best of both worlds.
Absoloutely not. But then you failed to clarify why your post made sense and instead continued a circular argument about reading minds with another poster. Errr....
Lol. Well I answered you, but it's pretty clear attempts at having a discussion with you is a waste of time anyways.
You made a comment, I quoted that comment and replied to the comment that I quoted. It's not complicated is it?
The comment had nothing at all to do with either my comment or the one I replied to. You'd think it's not complicated but here we are..
The comment had nothing at all to do with either my comment or the one I replied to. You'd think it's not complicated but here we are..
I utterly dislike PvP, and play solo so that I'll never have to put up with it, no matter where I go.
What assumptions?
In case you missed it, we have over 6,000 posts in this thread and another 20,000 in 2 other threads of people saying they hate the core mechanics of mode switching or having one BGS (sometimes both) - that is not an "assumption" that is a fact - you can read the evidence yourself, in this very thread, some of your own posts support that comment.
As for the Devs intentions, they made it quite clear when they said in response to calls to remove modes switching or locking content to open only that they support it and are not changing it. They also said they want 1 BGS - so where is the "assumption" when I have a full wall of quotes in my sig stating their intent ??
I've made no "assumptions" in the post you quoted.
And I can clearly see you have no intent to discuss anything.
With 1 post off topic with a veiled insult, followed up with another post with just insults in it - that's quite clear you're not here to talk about anything.
I agree completely. The only reason I started playing in open was that the game felt too lonely.
I've seen one player so far outside of an orbital station and nothing happened (and I was in Eravate which has a bad rep for ganking)
My reasoning for feeling safe on the outlying areas of the game isn't simply because the areas are more remote, but I'm working on the assumption that anyone that far away from the populated areas is probably there for the same reason I am, and is more likely to be friendly. Have to see how that works in practice![]()
I agree completely. The only reason I started playing in open was that the game felt too lonely.
I've seen one player so far outside of an orbital station and nothing happened (and I was in Eravate which has a bad rep for ganking)
My reasoning for feeling safe on the outlying areas of the game isn't simply because the areas are more remote, but I'm working on the assumption that anyone that far away from the populated areas is probably there for the same reason I am, and is more likely to be friendly. Have to see how that works in practice![]()