Calling all pirates, share your opening pirate spiel with us!

Oh here goes the rumor spreading again, nice try.

Edit:

I can see this thread getting off track very soon if this pattern is to follow, so I suggest any attempt of false information spreading to be put to a halt by their spreaders before the moderators get involved.

Sensitive topic? It's not spreading rumors to voice ones experiences and the conclusions they have drawn from them.
 
Sensitive topic? It's not spreading rumors to voice ones experiences and the conclusions they have drawn from them.

One can draw any conclusion they wish, however, when the conclusion has close ties to an organization that have spoken on the issue that contradicts the conclusion, one should know to add "this is my speculation..." "knowing that this contradicts the official statement of [insert relevant organization name/person name]..."

If one is to assert something contradictory to the official statement of an organization and insist that it is the truth, then it's simple libel at that point.

Edit:

If it isn't clear, tl;dr: freedom of speech and libel are two different things.
 
Last edited:
, ps the former way to pirate is slowly dying, asking politely for your cargo isn't a sound tacit, you should try steal and kill method, that way you will be feared more, and more people will drop there cargo, instead of loseing there ship

Biowaste and scrap maybe. Aren't traders generally carrying cargo worth more than their rebuy? So why would they blow it out the hatch? By the time you're desperate enough to do that death is probably certain anyhow.
 
Last edited:
One can draw any conclusion they wish, however, when the conclusion has close ties to an organization that have spoken on the issue that contradicts the conclusion, one should know to add "this is my speculation..." "knowing that this contradicts the official statement of [insert relevant organization name/person name]..."

If one is to assert something contradictory to the official statement of an organization and insist that it is the truth, then it's simple libel at that point.


Simple Libel if it is in fact not true. Just because an organization has published a public stance on a matter doesn't mean it is truth in action. To be libel, it has to be false, ans the speaker/typist has to know it is not true.
 
One can draw any conclusion they wish, however, when the conclusion has close ties to an organization that have spoken on the issue that contradicts the conclusion, one should know to add "this is my speculation..." "knowing that this contradicts the official statement of [insert relevant organization name/person name]..."

If one is to assert something contradictory to the official statement of an organization and insist that it is the truth, then it's simple libel at that point.

Well, not if it's true. Organizations are known to lie... or at least stretch the truth, when it's in their best interest. This can even be done somewhat unintentionally as they have a vested interest and bias.

Not saying that's the case here though, of course. Just elaborating on one of the many reasons I take everything someone else has to say with a grain or two of salt.

As you were...
 
Just because an organization has published a public stance on a matter doesn't mean it is truth in action. To be libel, it has to be false, ans the speaker/typist has to know it is not true...

...or reckless disregard for the truth.

Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
 
Last edited:
Well, not if it's true. Organizations are known to lie... or at least stretch the truth, when it's in their best interest. This can even be done somewhat unintentionally as they have a vested interest and bias.

Not saying that's the case here though, of course. Just elaborating on one of the many reasons I take everything someone else has to say with a grain or two of salt.

As you were...

Right, organizations do lie quite often to secure their interests. The public/media often finds in its best interest to portray the organizations in ways that fit their understanding/agenda.

There's simply a conflict of interest, and there has been ruling in favor of media and corporations to maintain a relative balance between the two.

If people just make fun of an organization for laughter's sake, not many would care, and some would even embrace it for PR purposes and free advertisement.

I am actually on the relative loose end of the spectrum.
 
Last edited:
...or reckless disregard for the truth.

Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
I'm sorry. I just had this hilarious notion of Gluttony stopping a T6 and barking for cargo, and a half hour later he's still going on with the guy about Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. - Gertz 1, Robert Welch 0. The least productive pirate stop in history, excepting of course the quality conversation.
 
I'm sorry. I just had this hilarious notion of Gluttony stopping a T6 and barking for cargo, and a half hour later he's still going on with the guy about Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. - Gertz 1, Robert Welch 0. The least productive pirate stop in history, excepting of course the quality conversation.

Well, one time I pulled an Asp expecting some cargo and it turned out quite differently than I expected:

https://www.reddit.com/r/EliteDange..._rarest_commodity_the_erudite_pirate_lord_of/
 

El Dragoon!

Banned
I'm sorry. I just had this hilarious notion of Gluttony stopping a T6 and barking for cargo, and a half hour later he's still going on with the guy about Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. - Gertz 1, Robert Welch 0. The least productive pirate stop in history, excepting of course the quality conversation.

make a quote about William Shakespeare, that will tie him up long enough for you to escape being pirated
 
Back
Top Bottom