UAs, Barnacles & More Thread 5 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Pleioine 11 is an odd planet. A water atmosphere with an atmospheric pressure 815,000 times stronger the Earths. More bizarrely is the fact its over 2000K and nowhere near a star.

Also, we're mining the crap out of its moons. Mines and Tea factories at every POI.

If it's got 815k atm, then 2000k temp is no stretch.
 
Still catching up on the thread since I took a short nap (slow down goes). When I woke up it suddenly struck me why nebulas...

They're dusty and they obscure what's inside them. If you wanted to put something somewhere that would make it hard for someone to spot it, why not put it in a big space cloud to hide it from prying eyes?

I can already read the responses claiming that it's silly because nebula stick out like sore thumbs on the galmap. But you're thinking about it as someone from outside the game. Though to us as players nebulae are nice places to visit and look at they're still basically features that obscure what's inside them (other than certain bright stars).

Yes, this thread has an amazing posting rate. btw,. I posted a nebula theorie 10 days ago:
With Meta being Greek for to go beyond I'm sure its outside the bubble.
Actually I was thinking about cosmic forges which might allow the formation of new materials due to extreme conditions e.g. supernova remnant or nebulas. The next supernova remnant is the Crab Nebula, quasi next door with 6.6kLy's to go *cough*. (see supernova list here).

See list here:
Supernova
designation
(year)
Constellation
Apparent
magnitude

Distance
(light years)
Type
Galaxy
Comments
7003200700000000000♠SN 2007bi
Virgo
7001183000000000000♠+18.3
7000100000000000000♠Ic?
anonymous dwarf galaxy
Extremely bright and long-lasting, the first good observational match for the pair-instability supernova model postulated for stars of initial mass greater than 140 solar masses (even better than SN 2006gy). The precursor is estimated at 200 solar masses, similar to the first stars of the early universe.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-14"][SIZE=2][14][/SIZE][/URL]
MENeaC Abell399.3.14.0
28.7
z=0.0613
Ia
anonymous red globular cluster associated with anonymous red elliptical galaxy in cluster Abell 399
First type Ia supernova associated with a globular cluster [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-2015arXiv150503407G-15"][SIZE=2][15][/SIZE][/URL][URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-UCB-2015-06-04-16"][SIZE=2][16][/SIZE][/URL]
7003105400000000000♠SN 1054
Taurus
2999400000000000000♠–6
6,500
7000200000000000000♠II
Milky Way
Remnant is the Crab Nebula with its pulsar (neutron star)
7003100600000000000♠SN 1006
Lupus
2999250000000000000♠–7.5[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-7"][SIZE=2][7][/SIZE][/URL]
7,200
7000100000000000000♠Ia
Milky Way
Widely observed on Earth; in apparent magnitude, the brightest stellar event in recorded history.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-NOAO1-8"][SIZE=2][8][/SIZE][/URL]
7003157200000000000♠SN 1572
Cassiopeia
2999600000000000000♠–4.0
8,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
Milky Way
Tycho's Nova
7002185000000000000♠SN 185
Centaurus
2999600000000000000♠−4 (?) [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-1"][SIZE=2][1][/SIZE][/URL]
8,200
7000100000000000000♠Ia (?)
Milky Way
Surviving description sketchy; modern estimates of maximum apparent magnitude vary from +4 to −8. The remnant is probably RCW 86, some 8200 ly distant,[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-2"][SIZE=2][2][/SIZE][/URL] making it comparable to SN 1572. Some researchers have suggested it was a comet, not a supernova.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-Chin-3"][SIZE=2][3][/SIZE][/URL][URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-Zhao-4"][SIZE=2][4][/SIZE][/URL]
7003118100000000000♠SN 1181
Cassiopeia
5000000000000000000♠0
8,500
Milky Way
7003168000000000000♠Cas A,
ca. 1680
Cassiopeia
7000500000000000000♠+5
9,000
7000200000000000000♠IIb
Milky Way
Apparently never visually conspicuous, due to interstellar dust; but the remnant, Cas A, is the brightest extrasolar radio source in the sky
7003160400000000000♠SN 1604
Ophiuchus
2999700000000000000♠–3
14,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
Milky Way
Kepler's Star; most recent readily visible supernova within the Milky Way
7002386000000000000♠SN 386
Sagittarius
7000150000000000000♠+1.5
14,700
7000200000000000000♠II
Milky Way
The candidate remnant is G11.2-0.3.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-SEDS_SN_386-5"][SIZE=2][5][/SIZE][/URL][URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-6"][SIZE=2][6][/SIZE][/URL]
7003186800000000000♠SNR G1.9+0.3,
ca. 1868
Sagittarius
25,000
Milky Way
"Posthumously" discovered in 1985; age determined in 2008
7002393000000000000♠SN 393
Scorpius
5000000000000000000♠–0
34,000
Milky Way
7003198700000000000♠SN 1987A
Dorado
7000290000000000000♠+2.9
160,000
7000200000000000000♠IIpec
Large Magellanic Cloud
Intense radiation reached Earth on February 23, 1987, 7:35:35 UT. Notable for archival photos of progenitor star and detection of supernova neutrinos. Most recent Local Group supernova
7003188500000000000♠SN 1885A
Andromeda
7000700000000000000♠+7
2,400,000
7000100000000000000♠Ipec
Andromeda Galaxy
First observation of an extragalactic supernova
7003189500000000000♠SN 1895B
Centaurus
7000800000000000000♠+8.0[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-cbat-9"][SIZE=2][9][/SIZE][/URL]
10,900,000
NGC 5253
7003197200000000000♠SN 1972E
Centaurus
7000870000000099999♠+8.7 [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-11"][SIZE=2][11][/SIZE][/URL]
10,900,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
NGC 5253
Followed for more than a year; became the prototypical Type Ia supernova
7003199300000000000♠SN 1993J
Ursa Major
7001108000000000000♠+10.8
11,000,000
7000200000000000000♠IIb
M81
One of the brightest supernovae in the northern sky since 1954
7003201400000000000♠SN 2014J
Ursa Major
7001100000000000000♠+10.5
11,500,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
M82
Closest supernova since SN 2004dj in NGC 2403
7003193700000000000♠SN 1937C
7000800000000000000♠+8.4[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-cbat-9"][SIZE=2][9][/SIZE][/URL]
13,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
IC 4182
7003198300000000000♠SN 1983N
Hydra
7001118000000000000♠+11.8
15,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ib
Messier 83
First observation of a Type Ib supernova
7003201100000000000♠SN 2011fe
Ursa Major
7001100000000000000♠+10.0
21,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
M101
One of the very few extragalactic supernovae visible in 50mm binoculars.
7003196100000000000♠SN 1961V
Perseus
7001125000000000000♠+12.5
30,000,000
7000200000000000000♠II?
NGC 1058
Potential supernova impostor[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-universetoday-10"][SIZE=2][10][/SIZE][/URL]
7003198600000000000♠SN 1986J
Andromeda
7001184009999900000♠+18.4
30,000,000
7000200000000000000♠IIn
NGC 891
Bright in the radio frequency range
7003194000000000000♠SN 1940B
Coma Berenices
7001128000000000000♠+12.8
38,000,000
7000200000000000000♠II-P
NGC 4725
7003200800000000000♠SN 2008D
Lynx
88,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ibc
NGC 2770
First supernova to be observed while it exploded.
7003200200000000000♠SN 2002bj
Lupus
7001147000000000000♠+14.7
160,000,000
7000100000000000000♠.Ia
NGC 1821
AM Canum Venaticorum-type outburst.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-ucnews-12"][SIZE=2][12][/SIZE][/URL]
7003200500000000000♠SN 2005gl
Pisces
7001165000000000000♠+16.5
200,000,000
7000200000000000000♠II-n
NGC 266
Star could be found on old pictures.[URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_supernovae#cite_note-13"][SIZE=2][13][/SIZE][/URL]
7003200600000000000♠SN 2006gy
Perseus
7001150000000000000♠+15
240,000,000
7000200000000000000♠IIn [SIZE=2](*)[/SIZE]
NGC 1260
Observed by NASA,
[SIZE=2]*[/SIZE]with a peak of over 70 days, possibly a new type.
7003200500000000000♠SN 2005gj
865,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia/II-n
?
Notable for having characteristics of both Type Ia and Type IIn.
7003200300000000000♠SN 2003fg
Boötes
4,000,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia
anonymous galaxy
Also known as the "Champagne supernova"
7003200500000000000♠SN 2005ap
Coma Berenices
4,700,000,000
7000200000000000000♠II
?
Announced in 2007 to be the brightest supernova up to that point.
7003200400000000000♠SN 2004dj
Camelopardalis
8,000,000,000
7000100000000000000♠Ia ( SAB)
NGC 2403
NGC 2403 is an outlying member of the M81 Group
.
I was heading out there for my Galatic Nebula Trip anyhow - but would be great if Frontier could indicate if one needs the mission so the stuff will spawn or if it the can be found by chance.
.
Happy Hunting.
ps: postponed the deep space trip and search within the AU bubble.
 
Pleioine 11 is an odd planet. A water atmosphere with an atmospheric pressure 815,000 times stronger the Earths. More bizarrely is the fact its over 2000K and nowhere near a star.

Also, we're mining the crap out of its moons. Mines and Tea factories at every POI.

Pleione 11 is a very special planet, it holds the record for the largest high metal content planet as well as the one with the most moons ;)
 
I was just wondering, does anyone know where the main menu planets are?

The one the in the background looks pretty interesting to say the least.

And as far as looking places goes, it's a place as good as any other (if it's in a nebula atleast).
 
I was just wondering, does anyone know where the main menu planets are?

The one the in the background looks pretty interesting to say the least.

And as far as looking places goes, it's a place as good as any other (if it's in a nebula atleast).

I have to imagine it's just for looks and doesn't exist in the game. I shudder to think about the gravitational effects of the two moons that close.. Add on a station orbiting close enough to view like that? Gotta just be for pretty appearances
 
I have to imagine it's just for looks and doesn't exist in the game. I shudder to think about the gravitational effects of the two moons that close.. Add on a station orbiting close enough to view like that? Gotta just be for pretty appearances

The moon being so close isn't impossible but the station is there for looks. As for the main planet it definitely exists but I don't know anyone who could tell you where it is.
 
With any luck, Horizons will come to Xbox before a barnacle is found, giving us a chance to join the search..
Luckily for y'all my luck is nonexistent haha
 
Has anybody tried to jettison an unknown artefact on one of the surface worlds of interest? If so what happened? If not I feel it would be quite interesting to see the result.
 
A more efficient method would be to fly in circles parallel to the equator - small circles near the poles, getting gradually larger as you approach the equator. Doing this would mean eliminating the overlap effect that comes with flying along meridians pole to pole - but it's still 10,000 loops around the planet, ranging from a short loop around a pole 500m away - about a 1500m loop taking a few seconds, to 20 million metres at the equator (a full circumference) and taking around 18 hours (for one loop).

Been doing some numbers on the above example. If anyone thinks I have something wrong, you're welcome to chime in. Here's what I reckon...

Planet circumference: 20,000km (assuming a perfect sphere for this)
Distance pole to pole: 10,000km (half of circumference)
Ship speed: 300m/s or 0.3km/s
Total number of passes along lines of latitude 1km apart: 9,999

Total distance travelled: 127,323,968 km
Total seconds in motion: 424,413,192
Total hours in motion: 117,893

The ship would take 13.5 YEARS to cover this example planet.

The basic calculation for each pass is cos(lat) * planet circumference. The increment for latitude in degrees, for a 1km step, is about 0.018 (or about 1.08 arc minutes). I didn't account for the first and last passes being 0.5km from the poles (I used 1km from the poles), so there is a small error of a handful of seconds due to that.

That's 13.5 years, flying constantly with no breaks. Even with 135 commanders in a coordinated effort, it would still take 0.1 years of constant, non-stop play with no breaks. If they each played 2.4 hours per day, it would take a year. For this one planet. Smaller ones will take less time, bigger ones will take longer.

I'm tempted to think that looking for a random POI will get a result sooner. Homing in on likely candidate planets or planetary features may well be quicker still. Suffice to say, belay any notion of brute force searching for manually placed barnacle sites - it's a complete and utter waste of time.
 
About UA's, and I am sure it has been mentioned before:
I just watched a video of a UA "dying" and I noticed it looks rather similar to a hyperjump in Frontier: Elite II and Frontier: First Encounters. I wonder if they're not actually hyperjumping away, instead of blowing up. The jet they emit at the moment, could be a kind of propulsion.
I know, not really relevant to the barnacle quest, but it's late and I was wondering.
 
About UA's, and I am sure it has been mentioned before:
I just watched a video of a UA "dying" and I noticed it looks rather similar to a hyperjump in Frontier: Elite II and Frontier: First Encounters. I wonder if they're not actually hyperjumping away, instead of blowing up. The jet they emit at the moment, could be a kind of propulsion.
I know, not really relevant to the barnacle quest, but it's late and I was wondering.

It's been proposed as a hypothesis and we've done frame by frame analysis of it, but the hypothesis didn't go anywhere.
 
There has to be more things in game to point towards their location. We shouldn't have to result to 3rd party resources, as not everyone has access to them.

There will have to be more clues, or evidence, or breadcrumbs that lead to the barnacles.

I would suggest you look for more clues before the barnacles themselves. Look for clues that point towards certain nebula or systems.



EDIT: I wouldn't be surprised if those planets that look to have green on the surface led to somewhere, as in 'this system has a planet that looks green from a distance, wonder if the next system does' or something like that, which if you connect them together (the stars) spells out something on the galaxy map or has a pattern of sorts.
 
Last edited:
I don't think this is actually related in any meaningful way, but the targets name was interesting. Christian Dock is where Palin first did his research, and now we know he will be doing it in Maia. Just a strange name for a person, that also happens to reference two systems that have officially had UA storyline take place in them. 419270_2016-01-13_00001.png
 
[FONT=&quot]If the barnacles are related to meta-alloys,maybe that is what their shell is made of, if so then they might be found onlyon high metal content or metal rich worlds, where there is plenty of rawmaterial to make the shell. I don't have any evidence for this though so it's just speculation on my part.[/FONT]
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom