UAs, Barnacles & More Thread 5 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Yes, I know, it was a first thought. It really depends from which angle this is looked at. If you move around in the galaxy map, the Witchhead Nebula fits in. But I'd be surprised if its really this easy ;)
HighResScreenShot_2015-03-28_04-36-28.png
 
Last edited:
SystemLocationDist From StarOrbit ParentOrbit Parent Type/AtmosphereSurface TempTidally Locked (to orbit parent)TypeGravityVolcanismVolatilesIceRockMetalNotes
Taygeta4226.65TaygetaBarycentre1388YesMetal Rich body3.15Silicate Vapour GeysersNo mention99.60
Taygeta71,676.87TaygetaBarycentre561YesRocky body2.90Silicate Vapour GeysersNo mention66.9033.10


Thats what I have for the Taygeta binary planets


Yes, my bad. Was still a jump out. Feel like such a overexcitable noob now :S
 
I need someone to confirm Barnicles at JC-U b3-2 1 coordinates 21.93 , 96.98

If we're able to confirm that we can pretty much say barnacles are causing malfunction in electronic systems, that made the anaconda on na 20.86 , 91.73 crash !s,

We are starting to understand the reason why so many stations have been experiencing malfunctions!
 
The frequency with new barnacles being discovered tonight makes me really think someones been tweaking the RNG on the server.

I would not say RNG is responsible. More likely is that it's way easier to find something when you know what it looks like and how far above the surface it is visible.
 
I need someone to confirm Barnicles at JC-U b3-2 1 coordinates 21.93 , 96.98

If we're able to confirm that we can pretty much say barnacles are causing malfunction in electronic systems, that made the anaconda on na 20.86 , 91.73 crash !s,

We are starting to understand the reason why so many stations have been experiencing malfunctions!

Nearly there, dinner comes first so others might beat me to it :p.
 
A crashed ship near Maia? We haven't heard from Professor Palin in a while, did he have an 'accident' en-route setting up his research outpost?
 
Got 4 meta alloy jumped to GW D1 52 grabbed a UA.... it still eats your ship with meta alloy on board... o7

I think Meta-alloy needs to be engineered via the crafting system to acquire special bulkeads in order to be protected when carrying UA's.(FD needs to implement this for the crafting system update ;) )
 
I think you guys should realize how a liar MB is. He said he made sure we would find it if we were in the right location. I have been asking where he made sure of that and he never answered. I have been at the exact fixed location and reloaded solo over 10 time and it never spawned. Switching to open get me to a destroyed spawn, and back to solo I get no Barnacle.

That means I wasted over 30 hours because of their damn losy developper and programmer skills to something that was totally boring and mind numbing, for absolutely no reason as I could never find it in solo.

Definitely out of of any of their stupid event and wish many follow that path.

Talk about a liar that doesnt double check what he says to his customer, even after clear questioning of his statement have been made.

Bad form.

Why on earth were you doing it if you found it boring, I spent the entire weekend, and the odd hour in the evening this week. I've no regrets.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom