I don't know if this was mentioned before; I'm not in the forums every day...
In the video about the Coriolis Station, David Braben mentioned that the best apartments would be the ones on the outside, the ones that receive the full 1G of (artificial) gravity.
I personally doubt this. The outside is more endangered by space debris and crashing ships, and is more doused by radiation from outside. Above that, I think that most people who live all the time on a station prefer to live in a lighter gravity. Not the unpractical 0G, but maybe .3 or .5: everything is lighter, incl themselves. Also the switch between 0G in a ship and .3 in your quarters are better to bear than going from 0G to 1G and back again all the time.
The downpour of living somewhere in the middle will be that there is no view outside. But who wants to see the world revolving every minute or so?
I know that this is not really an issue in the gameplay, but it just bothered me a bt, and I wanted to write it off me...
In the video about the Coriolis Station, David Braben mentioned that the best apartments would be the ones on the outside, the ones that receive the full 1G of (artificial) gravity.
I personally doubt this. The outside is more endangered by space debris and crashing ships, and is more doused by radiation from outside. Above that, I think that most people who live all the time on a station prefer to live in a lighter gravity. Not the unpractical 0G, but maybe .3 or .5: everything is lighter, incl themselves. Also the switch between 0G in a ship and .3 in your quarters are better to bear than going from 0G to 1G and back again all the time.
The downpour of living somewhere in the middle will be that there is no view outside. But who wants to see the world revolving every minute or so?
I know that this is not really an issue in the gameplay, but it just bothered me a bt, and I wanted to write it off me...