THIS IS HOW TO DO SCIENCE!
I wish I could give you infinite reps for this post! The scientific way to test any theory (meaning a proposed model that could explan the observed data) is to make a testable hypothesis that would most easily DISprove your model, then do the experiment to see if the results match what you'd predict if your theory were correct. Too few people understand that, including many scientists I've encountered. I tip my tinfoil to you!
Well, you know, RedWizzard's is the most shining example of REAL SCIENTIFIC APPROACH we're having on this thread, since day one.
I think I might have some bad news, the tuba honks don't seem to ever repeat themselves. I took an hour long video of Barnacle 2 and wrote down the low honks as 0's and the high honks as 1's. Here's what I got.
00010100100100011010001010001001001001001010100000101110101111101001110111110110111001011110010101010101010101111000110110101110110010110100010010100110100100100101010101100010001101100110100
there isn't any repetition ever, which means either A, the message it is sending is longer than 1 hour (which I doubt) or B, there is no message hidden in the honks (which unfortunately I'm starting to believe.)
That's what I have been suspecting since the beginning: the Purrs are too similar to the UA's to behave differently. No message there, no message here.
I like to say that, the PURRS, are the UA and Barnacles BREATHING.
That's all.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Just FYI: Decoding morse signals without knowing the seperator is...well almost infinitely futile.
Look at this code (regular morse term where I just deleted the seperators):
-...-.-.----...-----.-.....
When you enter it into here: http://www.dcode.fr/morse-code and hit the "Decrypt morse without seperators" button you will get 1000 iterations with different seperator patterns...in those 1000 I did not find the original wording which was:
DECODEMORSE
Exactly. AGREED completely. +REP