It's the star coordinates I'm after, not the barnacles.
Welcome to our brand new thread 6, CMDR Brookes!
Thanks for the info!
I tried aligning the formation to the in-game galaxy map, but the result is so imprecise that I don't think this can be the intended interpretation:
View attachment 98658View attachment 98659
This is an interesting idea. Perhaps each barnacled planet has a single larger, more central "control" structure which would be nearly impossible to find by chance (one spot in all the world, even for these small worlds, is still a needle in a haystack). But if barnacles are relatively common on such worlds, and if each of them is oriented such that it "points" at the base, then that would be a very straightforward way to find it (without requiring any advanced tools, either).
So I guess now we need to agree on some reference orientation (such as aligning down the two fruit-bearing spikes, with the extra spike on that axis positioned on the far side of the barnacle) and recording not only the coordinates of the formation, but the orientation. If we get several of those spread out on the same planet, we can see if their orientations converge somewhere.
Can you indicate where the Pleiades and Barnard's Loop are on this?
If the assumptions are that the barnacle is at the centre, and that it's a map of nebulae viewed top-down, then it should be possible to relate two dots on the overlay to these two nebulae. If that can be done, even with a fair amount of error, it should be possible to then check if the other dots are also close to nebulae - especially the two yellow ones.
Pleiades at top-right?
Can you indicate where the Pleiades and Barnard's Loop are on this?
If the assumptions are that the barnacle is at the centre, and that it's a map of nebulae viewed top-down, then it should be possible to relate two dots on the overlay to these two nebulae. If that can be done, even with a fair amount of error, it should be possible to then check if the other dots are also close to nebulae - especially the two yellow ones.
Pleiades at top-right?
It looks like we've figured out what's causing barnacles (and other surface goodies) not appearing consistently and there should be an update with this fix early next week.
Michael
All right guys, this might be totally unrelated, but I have been doing a lot of reading about the Pleiades. There are many, many legends/meanings behind the Pleiades depending on the culture, and it's something we can actually see from Earth even with the naked eye.
Either way, here is one of the earliest depictions of cosmology that we have found (dated around 1600BC). The Pleiades are actually depicted here.
View attachment 98725
Is this related to anything? No ideaBut just something else to consider. I am trying to read as much about this disc as possible, and see if there is anything else depicted here that could give any links. For those that are curious, this is called the "Nebra Sky Disc"
The markings on the center structure might indicate a point of interest to start from? Or at least B'sLoop maybe? I'm not at my home PC at the moment so i can't check the GalMap but i think we shouldn't disregard the markings.
Here's how ALL of the sites i took pictures of are laid out. Note that it's sometimes necessary to turn the picture 180 but it is basically this pattern as "on top" as i could manage
View attachment 98726
Not too serious (tinfoilhatting) By the way, do we even know if what light spectrum etc. the "unknown" species sees things in? I mean looking at the symbol with inverted colors it might as well be
View attachment 98723View attachment 98724
very long shot -
Ok chaps, anyone got the most precise coordinates for:
Maia
Merope
Pleione
P-Sec JS-U B3-2
I tried EDSC, etc. They seem more focused on collecting coordinates than having a simple way of displaying their info.
I would argue the opposite actually: when pointing nearly straight down, the compass/heading indicator is much less stable; we should instead try to be as level as possible when lining up the "axis" of the formation, in order to get a good reading on the compass.I just noticed an additional quirk with the make an arrow idea. We have to make sure our angle toward the centre of the barnacle bit is always almost 90 degrees from the surface of the planet (pointing as straight down as possible) otherwise it's possible for the direction to be wildly skewed
(images)
These are both the same barnacle from what would appear at first glance to be almost the same angle but the heading is more than 30 degrees off on the second one. Caused by a mere six degrees of extra tilt before re-lining up!
Plus there's thing of exactly why would it make any sense, and why would it be repeated three times?