The fact is, £200 and what you are getting for it in the long term ... is peanuts compared to the amount people would spend over the year on say, Steam on their computer or a console sitting in their house. £200 is not an issue and if it is, you really shouldn't be having a hobby that revolves around computer gaming ... no its far better they just stick to playing board game Monopoly with the family. :smilie:
Sorry mate, but can't agree with this. While you, and others, might not have a problem whipping out £200 for this, not everyone is in that situation - and to say that those without that sort of disposable income shouldn't even be in the hobby, or show an interest in the game is simply answering hyperbole with more hyperbole.
You're passionate about it, and fair dues for that, but the fact does remain that - especially from the outside looking in - it can certainly be argued that FD are making hay while the sun shines, to put it diplomatically. I've got several friends here in California who work for gaming companies like EA and 2K games, and have participated in several betas for them. There, the bloke on the podcast does have a point - when a title is in beta, it's a symbiotic relationship between the developer and the tester. The testers get to play a shiny new game without dipping into their wallets, and the developers get free part-time employees doing a fair whack of testing that they'd otherwise have to pay their staff to do.
During the Kickstarter phase it was one thing - back then people were indeed pledging money towards the development of a game, donating their cash, and in exchange were getting some goodies in return. As a result, FD not only met but exceeded their goal. Most people would think in that situation, the company would have said "Well, we got what we asked for, and quite a bit more, so we'll start working on the game now, those who backed us will get the perks we offered, and we'll see you down the road when the game is ready, but until then, you can preorder it online." Instead, the requests for premium prices have kept going, and indeed seem to have been pushed quite hard by the company, given their push to have people upgrade to Alpha from Premium Beta by offering half off insurance, and the promise of getting the releases prior to the other premium beta subscribers.
It is what it is though, and those that want it enough will pay the premium. I'm a massive fan of the Elite series - I blagged close to a thousand bucks on a refurbished Amiga 1200 so I could play Frontier, which I then sold and invested considerably more in a custom rig purely to play this on. My Saitek X52 Pro just arrived from Amazon, and when I get paid tomorrow, I'll probably fork over the dosh for Premium Beta. But even I, as biased as I am IN FAVOUR of Elite Dangerous, can certainly still see "Yeah, FD are being quite greedy here, and a bit cheeky." And can certainly see how those who are ambivalent towards the game would be a bit outraged at what was being asked.
The irony is that if Frontier had worded the whole thing differently - instead of SELLING Alpha and Beta after the backing period ended and simply continued to ask for donations with (fewer) perks in return, chances are there'd be no issues like this. Instead people like these lads from Sticktwiddlers would have simply said "Well, if you're willing to donate money to it, more power to you, we'll just wait for the final game."