PvPers are fond of saying that if you choose to play in open you must accept PvP... well if you choose to engage with the BGS by having a faction & station then you must accept PvE. Simple.
This -^- totally this!
PvPers are fond of saying that if you choose to play in open you must accept PvP... well if you choose to engage with the BGS by having a faction & station then you must accept PvE. Simple.
Cable pullers and router tweakers may deserve a ban in the eyes of some people, but they are operating at a level over which FD has no control. Some may see it as illegitimate gameplay, but as those actions don't occur within the game itself, how can FD legitimately ban them for breaking in-game rules?
That's the thing though, unlike the incursion into mobius where players WERE forced into PvP, PvE wasn't forced on SDC. The BGS runs on PvE but if (as they professed) they had no interest in the station, the BGS, of PvE then no-one was forcing them to engage in it. If however you're suggesting that their station should have remained untouchable simply because they chose not to defend it I'd probably laugh at you. PvPers are fond of saying that if you choose to play in open you must accept PvP... well if you choose to engage with the BGS by having a faction & station then you must accept PvE. Simple.
This -^- totally this!PvPers are fond of saying that if you choose to play in open you must accept PvP... well if you choose to engage with the BGS by having a faction & station then you must accept PvE. Simple.
Oh god I needed a good laugh!Or are they a bunch of geniuses who are with the program
Well I think they stated no interest in the station because they're not stupid and realized there's 0 chance of success for a group that's not PvE. No success in the context of winning the station and no success in respect to whatever their wider goals were. In that instance it's better to just not try.
I suppose a third angle for the story could be that SDC actually "won" in that they succeeded in bringing their (claimed) issue right to the forefront.
But they did accept it didn't they? Like right away they essentially said.. yeah take it were not bothered. Whether they were bothered or not is another matter but they did not fight it.
And it's a noob telling you this.
Kind of like players comparing them to ISIS?
That's probably where they got the idea, and decided to run with the absurdity of it.
Edit -"We've been called terrorists and worse than ISIS," Alberts says. "It's just a mockery of that. Music is music. Just because it sounds Arabic doesn't mean it's ISIS music. ISIS do not represent Islam. You know they burn musical instruments? ISIS doesn't have music.
Totally false statement, on many levels.
1) Calling Mobius members exploiters is just slander.
2) SDC cheated themselves into a group that doesn't do direct PvP outside of combat zones, and then proceeded to force their playstyle upon their victims, while gloating about it.
3) No one knows how many players who "retaliated" through the BGS actually were/are a) members of Mobius, b) playing in Mobius when the BGS activities took place.
Don't try to blame the victims.
Nice try.
Maybe you need a picture or a book explaining why we are too busy playing the division, eve online or dark souls 3 while you kill NPC's in solo but we simply don't give a dying rat about this system.
We didn't even KNEW about it until recently.
We don't play the BGS/PP because solo/private players are directly impacting it so until this is fixed we will stick to blowing people up.
interesting to read that one of the Co-founders of the SDC is an Ozzy
I figured I had never run in to the SDC in open was due to my time zone heh
Oh no.Maybe you need a picture or a book explaining why we are too busy playing the division, eve online or dark souls 3 while you kill NPC's in solo but we simply don't give a dying rat about this system. We don't play the BGS/PP because solo/private players are directly impacting it so until this is fixed we will stick to blowing people up.
Very nice. I'm glad you are having fun playing something.
Well that is a problem with group leadership. If group has system and doesn't know about it - leadership has failed.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
The more you do that - the worse it gets
PFSense rules blocking your members are now trading at $5 a pop![]()
what does leadership has anything to do with that!?!?