There are already 1.6 billion Muslims. I'm sure if they wanted to start a dispute over anything, they would have done so by now.
And won.
And 6 billion who are not Muslim
There are already 1.6 billion Muslims. I'm sure if they wanted to start a dispute over anything, they would have done so by now.
And won.
In the future, it is a possibility, of course
And as regards to deaths neither due to natural causes nor accident, here's something to think about: http://www.theguardian.com/environm...on-public-health-emergency-crisis-diesel-cars
Not really i just have hard time understand what you meant. English is not my mother language you know?
Well... the way i see we have 2 choices. We can either finish to throw sarcastic remarks, and making the debate personal, or we can have another topic closed. What will be?![]()
And what you want to do about it? because to let them to continue is the worst imaginable resolution, compared to this anything is a forward step.
the aboriginal UK citizens
You just need to have much more childrens.
And what you want to do about it? because to let them to continue is the worst imaginable resolution, compared to this anything is a forward step.
Should I give my womb to the Fatherland?
Neither of those, I'm trying to be civil and ask you what do you intend to do about these things that concern you so much?
Who are the "aboriginal UK citizens"?
You can do quite a lot against them without starting a war or utilizing an army.
Prevent the migration of new recruits.
Counter the propaganda of the IS.
Collect data over who funds them/where their funds are and freeze those funds.
Bring the civil war in Syria to an end (easier said than done, I know).
If you think starting a war is better than the situation at the moment, then you know nothing about how this kind of stuff works.
Starting a war against terrorism hasn't worked in the past and it won't work in the future.
Sure, no prob, just try to be a little more discreet, because after about 100K posts altogether various in political blogs and forums in the past 10 years, + FB my experience says anyone who takes up a style you did is want to frame you or start a flame war. This is how we roll out of there in the Deep water. This place? It's just a bathtub to me with rubber duck.![]()
Maybe the ones whom came from Australia with a boomerang under their belt?
Because they are the aboriginals.
have you read my other posts in there we are just talking about it right now.Good, I'm glad we understand each other
Now, back to the question; what do you think should be done to address your concerns?
Well, "aboriginal" just means the original peoples of any territory. The British Isles have been settled by so many peoples (Romans, Vikings, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Picts, Celts, French, European and Commonwealth) that there isn't really an "original" people anymore. So to imply that there's any sort of "pure" or "original" British people is pure fantasy.
Essentially all you said right now means warfare against them in open or hidden ways.
Yeah somehow like that.Like 5th columning them in Private Groups / Solo?![]()
Essentially all you said right now means warfare against them in open or hidden ways.
have you read my other posts in there we are just talking about it right now.
For a starter you must think twice whom and how many you allow to enter Europe, or England, if they are decide to continue separate ways.
Can you elaborate on that?
Not really.
Nope. When I say war I mean war. Not a metaphorical war with economic means nor a cyber war nor actions of the secret service against them.
EDIT: I'm off to play with my cat. Thanks for the interesting discussion everyone!![]()
You can do quite a lot against them without starting a war or utilizing an army.
Prevent the migration of new recruits.
Counter the propaganda of the IS.
Collect data over who funds them/where their funds are and freeze those funds.
Bring the civil war in Syria to an end (easier said than done, I know).
If you think starting a war is better than the situation at the moment, then you know nothing about how this kind of stuff works.
Starting a war against terrorism hasn't worked in the past and it won't work in the future.
*sarcasm on* Hell yeah, let's give our wombs to the fatherland, Marra. *sarcasm off*
As Marra just said, 5th column is also a form of warfare only more subtle than bombing the hell out of them, and most of the time also means open actions, like raids targetting head personnel, destroying infrastructure, and so on. But i think It's not going to be enough against an organization with cell structure, and little dependency from infrastructure. because terrorists are like that not to mention the territory what they holding it must be liberated, and the one and only way to do that if someone go in and do the dirty job. What essentially means if we play the role of the 5th column, than someone else must do it, but real war is going to happen no matter what.
Everything you just said is part of the 5th column warfare, as secret services operation and guerrilla / asymmetrical warfare. And in under the current conditions we have no choice about it.Not a single one of those terms I listed has anything to do with 5th column warfare or violence in the first place. I've also not proposed a guerilla war like you described it. Would be new to me that you can 5th column a terror group ... even if Daesh is an unusual group.
And for the part with "war is going to happen no matter what.": I prefer peace. The one thing I learned for sure in the army, is that I don't want to experience a war. Even if I'm unfit for military service now.
Everything you just said is part of the 5th column warfare, as secret services operation and guerrilla / asymmetrical warfare. And in under the current conditions we have no choice about it.
A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group—such as a nation or a besieged city—from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation. The activities of a fifth column can be overt or clandestine. Forces gathered in secret can mobilize openly to assist an external attack. This term is also extended to organized actions by military personnel. Clandestine fifth column activities can involve acts of sabotage, disinformation, or espionage executed within defense lines by secret sympathizers with an external force.
As do i.But The Islamic state is not interested in peace. They are interested in conquest, and forcible conversion. What sadly means we have war and terrorist attacks.
Notice how this thread has gone from discussing an advert on a bus to terrorism while nobody has provided the slightest evidence of any verifiable link between the former and the latter? That is what is known as guilt by association - a classic tactic of rabble-rousers everywhere.
Yeah, we gone somewhat off from the topic track but not so far, because currently we are discussing the real problems behind it. Its a connected question.