Is "Save"ing still a legitimate tactic to avoid destruction ?

No my friend, no >_>

Having read this thread, and many others you've contributed to, would you care to know what makes me sad, GluttonyFang? That as an Xbox commander, meeting you in game is only a dream. That saddens me.

As for the topic at hand? Op is a tool for logging out on a fight he started, especially since he was so close to a proper escape.
 
Last edited:
But your honor, speculation... :D

The defendant testified that:

"Before I could jump into super-cruise he had my shields down and my hull is slowly crumbling. I went to high-wake out and, horror of horror, my FSD is unavailable, offline. He had shot it out. So now all I can do is boost and wait to die. So I kept boosting, he kept firing, but amazingly I'm gaining ground. Slowly the hits get much less damaging and I keep boosting....and boosting.... At 13% hull my shields come back online (thats a long time in a Conda). I keep boosting. The firing stops. I boost a couple more times, try my FSD - its still off-line, still no firing so I hit "Save and exit to Desktop". The 15-second count-down takes forever and towards the end I can hear the firing start again. Any second I'm expecting to hear the Conda explode.....and suddenly I can save... Phew - close call....."


As we can see here, the defendant merely testified that he was gaining ground, a cease of firing from the aggressor does not mandate the possibility of being out of range.

If such speculating were allowed, it's more likely that the aggressor believe his prey has no mean of escape considering the status of the victim's FSD and decided to make use of the communication panel.



Except that it's pretty much improbable considering the quantified data I'm providing:

FDL downgraded to extreme low speed has a boost of 370+ and a travel top speed of 275+


Conda upgraded to the extreme high speed has a boost of 280+ and a travel top speed of 210+


Pilot error is very much unlikely considering the FDL pilot has the ability to accurately destroy the FSD of the Conda.



Indeed, which is why I've proposed that kind of mechanic as a part of my proposal:

https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php?t=235327

oh god, who made you a judge in the internet?
 
oh god, who made you a judge in the internet?

.-.

No, we were just playing court room simulator 2016, and I was RPing as an attorney .-.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Having read this thread, and many others you've contributed to, would you care to know what makes me sad, GluttonyFang? That as an Xbox commander, meeting you in game is only a dream. That saddens me.

It's okay, I accept the appreciation gladly nevertheless :D
 
Yea, it's just as I expected, he shot out your FSD so he basically wanted to toy with you by giving you the illusion that you're getting away. A little sadistic for my taste I'd say, but then it's within accepted combat parameter of the game.

Basically look at it this way, if you engage in combat, and you feel that you can't win, start fleeing via high-wake. If your FSD gets shot out and you don't have a AFM handy and you're in a slower ship with less firepower to defend yourself, you kind of have to accept that death, it's courtesy for the player that cornered you.

Just as if we make people's cargo disappear upon their destination of trading/mining/smuggling, exploration data randomly disappearing for no reason, bounty hunting targets disappearing before destruction, people will be frustrated, and to call it a functional part of the game just adds fuel on that, not only on Cmdrs looking for blood but also for those who legitimately want to engage in player piracy. There is a reason why there's so much tension between members of the community, don't become one of them, that's all I can ask for.

And for your information, I took your name off of a few KoS lists, it seems like you're not the type that does it to frustrate people and genuinely care about the people you interact with. Just remember, no matter what method, legitimized or not, if you are doing it to frustrate people, you're a part of the problem, not the solution.

Thank you.
This is the first post I have ever repped - hope I did it right
 
To the OP: renaming combat log to saving, i have to admit it's a new one.

Now now, not much harm is done, plus OP explained his situation, let's not assume malice until proven otherwise.

Edit:

A tip for the OP:

It seems like you gathered pretty much the full spectrum of opinions and the dilemma appears to be solved, you might want to contact and request the mods to close the thread.
 
Last edited:
Wait... He out-boosted an FDL in an Anaconda? Are we sure this was a human CMDR?

It's a pretty poor pilot in an FDL that can't catch an Anaconda, and probably deserves not getting the kill simply for not knowing where he bound the "boost" and "100% throttle" buttons.

Z...
 
Wait... He out-boosted an FDL in an Anaconda? Are we sure this was a human CMDR?

It's a pretty poor pilot in an FDL that can't catch an Anaconda, and probably deserves not getting the kill simply for not knowing where he bound the "boost" and "100% throttle" buttons.

Z...


We only have the OP's word on that and I have seen no evidence to the contrary to disbelieve it. There could have been a Very Good Reason as to why the CMDR in the FdL couldn't catch up with the Conda - or there couldn't, we don't know, as we haven't heard from the other CMDR.

So it's probably best just to leave the thread alone now and put it down to lessons have been learnt.

<O
 
Script kiddies, loggers, cheats - all from the same camp in my opinion.
You missed private group infiltrators.

So - did I do wrong ? Is saving under these circumstances a legitimate tactic ? He asked me not to do it again. My response was as long as Frontier regarded it as a legitimate tactic I would continue to do it.
And right you are.

Don't be bothered by the guys who're slagging you for it. They are on record for condoning far worse than a legitimate legal log-off, with the justification: FD has no rule against it. So if they are putting you on KoS lists they reveal themselves being the hypocrites they are.
 
Last edited:
Don't be bothered by the guys who're slagging you for it. They are on record for condoning far worse than a legitimate legal log-off, with the justification: FD has no rule against it. So if they are putting you on KoS lists they reveal themselves being the hypocrites they are.

Except that there is no contradiction.

Safe combat log is legitimate, putting players on KoS list for any reason is also legitimate, as long as it doesn't carry over to anything real life.
 
Except that there is no contradiction.

Safe combat log is legitimate, putting players on KoS list for any reason is also legitimate, as long as it doesn't carry over to anything real life.
Except I said there is hypocrisy.

Graceful exit combat logging = frustrating players so reason for KoS lists. Eventhough FD allows it in their rules.
Private Group infiltration = frustrating players so reason for "Yeah, I don't approve, but whatchagonnado? FD allows it, and we're not going to throw them out of our little club that's for sure, those little rascals [heart]"

Hypocrisy in attitude towards similar cases.
 
Last edited:
One thing I'm really trying to understand, and perhaps someone can layman it for me..

Why is it so important to destroy someone's ship, who has already submitted, lost, and is running with their tail between their legs?

Just for the fact you have already won, makes you the winner, yet, the zero in game incentive to send the opponent to the insurance screen seems irrelevant, pointless, and has no further in game importance.

Perhaps my illogical vantage point makes me miss the finer details...
 
Back
Top Bottom