Not heard much (anything) from the Elephant Crew. I'm on my way, about another hour
Checking in then, I'm still here, was just sleeping. I'll probably stay here for the day and check out signal sources.
Not heard much (anything) from the Elephant Crew. I'm on my way, about another hour
The only solution that makes any sense to me (still) is that the UP is a key to the markings on the UA.
The UA has 2 different sequences of lights that have 1-4 lights in each row.
[great gallery from someone showing the 2 sequences clearly]
http://imgur.com/gallery/CBRTS
The sequences seems to be (roughly):
1-1-3-3-1-3-3-3-3-4-3-1 (or 3?)
1-1-3-2-1-3-1-1-1-2-1-1
[TOP<---->BOTTOM]
Note:
- there is no zero, so a direct mathematical interpretation would be 'hard' to understand.
- there is only one '4', which would be unusual if this has a mathematical purpose.
- the binary interpretation of the UP matches that range (1-4, no zero).
Facts:
Tip Off Missions reveal messages which infer being attacked by unknown craft, or encountering something highly unusual. So far these have been located in various locations within the human bubble.
Report from ET;
I have gone to a few of the systems listed by the CMDR who claimed to find a UP.
Of the ones I could get to most were single star systems that were alone, or had no landables.
Of the rest they would not resolve in the galaxy map, so I'm unsure if there is a typo or something. (Yes I double checked my spelling, I know how to search for systems) but they seem to be unavailable to me due to this.
Will hang around here a little longer.
I have to disapprove this.
I am in ET and have been there for countless hours trying to find USS.
I found and entered all the systems of the Reddit CMDRs flight log.
The systems do exist but so far I only found wrecks with survey data.
After the Reddit CMDR narrowed the search in by answering a reply on Reddit we should now be looking for an USS to pop up near a landable planet in a system with an orange star.
The systems that best fit this description and are right next to his proposed system ending with D20 are the systems D18 and D19.
I did not manage to have any USS pop up near landable planets in these systems so I hereby encourage anyone in ET to keep looking near landable planets in the D18 and D19 systems.
Excellent synopsis - for those of us struggling to keep up ... thanks for posting!
Re: the following ...
Might be worth mentioning that the tips (and indeed some of the quotes from Jaques) repetedly refer to sound/noise.
Report from ET;
I have gone to a few of the systems listed by the CMDR who claimed to find a UP.
Of the ones I could get to most were single star systems that were alone, or had no landables.
Of the rest they would not resolve in the galaxy map, so I'm unsure if there is a typo or something. (Yes I double checked my spelling, I know how to search for systems) but they seem to be unavailable to me due to this.
Will hang around here a little longer.
I've been able to find every system in the image via search. Make sure the first O is an o and the second 0 is a zero.
DL-Y D19 has a few landables...two are even around an orangy type star. All I've found is a small survey cache so far however.
While I find myself enjoying this mystery I also find myself cursing Frontier. From a pure game play perspective ie not using external tools, there should be some way to gain more information or insight to this dilemma.
For example:
A pilot notices a military convoy with an Unknown Probe in one of the ships cargo holds.
The Military Transport ( A python ) has some semi unique comms chatter
Pilot chooses to follow the Python to see where it goes, it jumps system and player follows it there. [New system - Wolf 1453]
Some more comms chatter (not unique).
It then heads towards a station. [Station name - Akers Gateway (not sure of spelling)]
It then appears to drop out at the station (player suffered a crash to main menu at that point).
Whether or not it was going to do orbital testing there or not is up for the usual internet jury to decide, but I personally doubt it.
My main point being that if the NPC is saying the things it does, it should actually do what it's saying. Otherwise players will essentially ignore NPC chatter for being meaningless.
Since Unknown Probes are currently rarer than rocking horse poop, no testing can be done with regards to said planet / station.
Long story short: Frontier, if these things are just tidbits of info, that's great but rephrase the chatter to make more in game sense. ie if the ship is not going to the designated co-ordinates, don't tell us they are.
It is now time for me to remind you all of this 'cause you are all frustrated and reasons
In the beginning we had just as little information to go by about the UA. It was also at first discovered in transports who chattered useless stuff.
Then after an update to the game the UA was found free floating.
Patience dear CMDRs. The time will come and with it resolve. History tells us that FDev love to see our reactions to certain game content, they will stitch some new game content together accordingly and release it/smuggle it in with an update.
Be cool - be arctic cool - be arctic ;-)
SO ?
did you find an Unknown Probe floating in space ??
Well, you could interpret the left-hand image as a UA, with the rings off it being something emitted by the UA, such as light or sound.
Then the sphere image could be simply saying "this is a 3D co-ordinate system", with the quadrants indicating which co-ordinate corresponds to which part of the sequence.
Something the UA does four times maybe? Or break the two sequences you have up into two or four?
If you write them as binary they're 9 or 18-bits each, which is a bit weird, but necessary if you want numbers >256 like 360...?
001001011 011001011 011011011 100011001 / 011
001001011 010001011 001001001 010001001
75 203 203 281 / 283
75 139 73 137
Hang on a minute, it could be something incredibly simpler...
I cant try this as going on holiday
Overlay the probe message over the map of merope showing known barnacles. This fits in with the idea that the UA points to the system and the UP shows where the barnacles can be found within that system . It also fits in with the 'key' theory.
If correct, taking it to another nebula or system with known barnacles then scanning it may reveal all other barnacles. This fits in with a 'purpose' and also with Michaels comments of 'testing it somewhere else'.
If this establishes it's purpose of locating alien anomalies then it could follow that it could also be used to scan for crashed alien ships etc etc