UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Guys something has changed on Merope 5c since this afternoon's patch: The coordinates aren't reversed anymore. I've followed this since the beginning of thread 7 and (like others) used the 'golden angle' to go from 0 lat 0 long on a heading of 137. I searched for hours at a time and found nothing worth posting. Because MB used the word "direction" twice in today's cryptic posts, I thought I'd go back and reverse the heading to 222 (opposite direction) because ... well I'm as stuck as everyone else.

0 degrees used to be next to the huge crater... it isn't anymore and the coordinates are working properly. Following the golden angle will now not only take me in a totally different route to before the update, the starting point of 0 degrees is now in a totally different place.

I really hope the folks at FDev haven't been scratching their heads wondering why we weren't following their really obvious clue... then realised they'd got the planet the wrong way round.

:eek:
 
You'll find what you're looking for here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...HpjYGeZL9GHQ/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=1094783116

This is by no means a definitive list; around 50 total barnacles have been found, but this gives some information regarding what materials can be found with a few of them.

Many thanks good Sir. Phew, just a quick look and my hopes of finding an 'easier' way to determine likely candidates are dashed. Quite random distribution. Am also hanging my head in shame because i thought i'd checked the bncl-meta doc. Thanks again
 
OK, MB what have you done this time!
Enough!
We have too many mysteries now lol

This is from the tower (inside, at the rear) in the Linnaeus station in G 99-49
More to come in s short moment ...

wNVDKhr.png
 
Last edited:
Well, that explains it. The orbit line of Merope 5C is entire within the star itself.

Edit: I'm not an astronomer and I don't know how accurate orbits need to be, but this bugs me. If Merope 6 is causing Merope 5 to "orbit" along a path entirely within the surface of Merope 5, then I would call it a wobble. And Merope 6 would still be classified as Merope 5d in my head.

Yeah this has bugged me too. At what point is a binary planet just a moon.
 
Last edited:
GUYS. TODAY'S PATCH NOTES MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT THE PROBE.

"Audio:
- Fixed bug where planetary music suite didn't play when approaching from supercruise
- Reduced the timing interval on the probe to bring the total transmission down to just over 6 mins
- Small volume boost on flight controllers and radio chatter"

Interesting... So histogram that much/length and compress the image, or overlay it with itself or something?
 
Guys something has changed on Merope 5c since this afternoon's patch: The coordinates aren't reversed anymore. I've followed this since the beginning of thread 7 and (like others) used the 'golden angle' to go from 0 lat 0 long on a heading of 137. I searched for hours at a time and found nothing worth posting. Because MB used the word "direction" twice in today's cryptic posts, I thought I'd go back and reverse the heading to 222 (opposite direction) because ... well I'm as stuck as everyone else.

0 degrees used to be next to the huge crater... it isn't anymore and the coordinates are working properly. Following the golden angle will now not only take me in a totally different route to before the update, the starting point of 0 degrees is now in a totally different place.

I really hope the folks at FDev haven't been scratching their heads wondering why we weren't following their really obvious clue... then realised they'd got the planet the wrong way round.

:eek:

hmmmm. If this is true i'll be making my way over there shortly. I've been waiting for any sort of tipoff that something has changed so I can return.
 
If the barycenter is in space between the planets, it's a binary system.

If it's inside the bigger one, the small one is a moon.

What if its inside the smaller one?

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Do large craters usually have mounds in the middle? Hip 17225 also has this, like M5c

Yes, its a natural effect for the same reason you get a rebound drop when a water droplet hits a surface.
 
Here's my issue with this: If the numbers are the first four digits of pi, shouldn't it read: 3 1 4 1 instead? And if it is pi to three decimal places, rounding up the last digit to 2, where is the decimal? Is the double arc adjacent to the 3 supposed to represent it?

And just throw this out there, but PI being expressed as "3.14159..." (or rounded even further to "3.142" in this case) is specific to human-centric base-10 math. If this truly is alien in origin, there's no reason to assume that they'd use base-10 math. (And not just base ten math, but base ten AND base 2, like we do. Unless we assume that the aliens have hands with the same number of fingers, and decided to base their math on that fact, just like humans did, etc.)

For the 3-1-4-2 theory to work out, we must read these marking and assume they're binary representations of those digits/numbers, but if this species uses binary for math, then the ratio for the circumference of a circle to its diameter in pure binary (if I did my math right) would be (in binary) 011.001001000 (approximated in 12 binary "digits" and very rounded), which if split into 3-binary-digit groupings would come out as 011 001 001 000, i.e., 3-1-1-0 and not 3-1-4-2. In PURE BINARY.

Just throwing that out there. Personally, I'm very inclined to think that the "numbers" (if indeed they are numbers, which is quite plausible) are NOT a binary representation of a decimal representation of PI, as that's such a purely human thing to do.

Of course, there's nothing (that I know of) that says that the message ISN'T human in origin...
 
hmmmm. If this is true i'll be making my way over there shortly. I've been waiting for any sort of tipoff that something has changed so I can return.


It's true. It means that those of us who spent hours following a search pattern to match the graphic were starting in the wrong place and going in the wrong direction.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom