I think we just need to try and apply some logic re UA locations. I know. a lot of us already are - just not the right logic![]()
Heh, I know. Was just trying to lighten the mood...
I think we just need to try and apply some logic re UA locations. I know. a lot of us already are - just not the right logic![]()
I think we just need to try and apply some logic re UA locations. I know. a lot of us already are - just not the right logic![]()
I think we just need to try and apply some logic re UA locations. I know. a lot of us already are - just not the right logic![]()
The problem right now is the vast number of theories, with no idea which is correct :/
The problem right now is the vast number of theories, with no idea which is correct :/
"The UA is a coarse probe, the UP a fine probe, so it'll be found closer to it's target"
"I've worked on the spectrogram, and decided that the UP shell is 2-3x further out than the UA shell, so we should look about 400LY away"
So, in conclusion, we need to be looking nearer AND further away than the UA shell is found currently![]()
4. Do we have a tool that shows us all UA´s in a bubble (good 3d-spacemap)?
Another problem is that people who come up with theories barely ever test them themselves. This to me means that they aren't really confident in their own theory.
The problem right now is the vast number of theories, with no idea which is correct :/
"The UA is a coarse probe, the UP a fine probe, so it'll be found closer to it's target"
"I've worked on the spectrogram, and decided that the UP shell is 2-3x further out than the UA shell, so we should look about 400LY away"
So, in conclusion, we need to be looking nearer AND further away than the UA shell is found currently![]()
So...a hypothesis. At the moment the only UP's we are able to find are those from the T4 Convoy. The convoy states that it's done its testing at Alpha site, and is now progressing to Beta site.
Could this mean that the data/image we are getting from the UP at the moment, are the results of its probing of Alpha site, and therefore will always be the same?
Its certainly possible that a free floating UP wouldn't have been subject to its 'probe cycle' yet, and so would be more of a blank canvas.
It's Highly unlikely it is, but there's a really small possibility.Since UPs are on the prohibited list, maybe they can be bought somewhere?
Wouldn't them being in a bigger bubble defeat the purpose of being a finer probe? Expanding the bubble would just be brute-forcing.
Now, I'm not saying they're neither, and if they are a fine probe, and they seem to be, we need to find their target.
Good point, I guess though, that it would be possible to alter the outcome by doing our own "orbital" tests. Regarding those, I am pretty sure that it is enough if you are in the proximity of a planet/moon, since that changes the behavior already, so no need to drop the OP in orbital cruise.
http://i.imgur.com/TLk3K9W.jpg I don't have a 3d map, but that shows their distribution, definitely focuses on the 'poles' of the shell, using Sol as its focus point
What i mean is, maybe the Probe is a one time deal. It's already been used by the convoys to collect data, and that data is now stored in its system as the spectrogram. Now whenever we scan it, all we are getting is its stored data, along with any extra background noise due to our location.
If we find them free floating, they won't have been 'used', and so may give different results.