Privata Oct 26, 2016 #21 I think you are right. FD have hinted at war gameplay being improved. so I wonder if this is like you said a hint at that. Another example would be the mention of CQC months before the update was even made public.
I think you are right. FD have hinted at war gameplay being improved. so I wonder if this is like you said a hint at that. Another example would be the mention of CQC months before the update was even made public.
Vasious Oct 26, 2016 #22 Privata said: I think you are right. FD have hinted at war gameplay being improved. so I wonder if this is like you said a hint at that. Another example would be the mention of CQC months before the update was even made public. Click to expand... I wonder if it will be enticing enough to change my No Enlistment policy
Privata said: I think you are right. FD have hinted at war gameplay being improved. so I wonder if this is like you said a hint at that. Another example would be the mention of CQC months before the update was even made public. Click to expand... I wonder if it will be enticing enough to change my No Enlistment policy
Adhock A Oct 27, 2016 #23 Gamel0rd1 said: Biggest ship? No. Biggest offensive ship? Maybe. I think that huge structures/ships are allowed but a weapon capacity must be reached. Click to expand... You know of a ship Bigger then the Farraguts and the Interdictors?
Gamel0rd1 said: Biggest ship? No. Biggest offensive ship? Maybe. I think that huge structures/ships are allowed but a weapon capacity must be reached. Click to expand... You know of a ship Bigger then the Farraguts and the Interdictors?
