Yowser, what a difference between Horizons and Non-Horizons

Planet viewed in non-horizons
upBhL5D.png


Same planet, same position, but in Horizons
9TZAqLZ.png


Chalk, meet cheese
 
well to be fair, it was an accident. I really was seeing if non-horizons would be faster to jonk (and I think it is actually - I can hit 44 secs on a non-scoopable v a best of about 48 and a usual of about 51 in horizons since 2.2; pre 2.2 it was around 44/45). But when it loaded I was like huh? where am I? So I went back to horizons to confirm. there's some saying about small things and small minds....
 
Wow. Such a difference. Much prefer the non-horizons one, looks more interesting and what I'd think you'd find. Oh, well.

I think the non-Horizons one looks much larger than the Horizons one, and I can tell this planet has a diameter of sub-1000 km (I.e. the exaggarated features don't look out of place). However, I also wish there would be more shiny execution to icy planets, and in 2.2 there are several nice ones.
 
Horizons 2.1 and 2.2 also make a big difference.

In 2.1 you had the occasional colourful landable planet, in 2.2, they're either grey for rocks, brown for the rest. All brown all the time.

System maps look boring, planets look boring, and when the Bubble dwellers were claiming that every planet looked the same, 2.2 made them right.
 
Last edited:
Forgot I was in non-horizons and bounced off the orbit drop zone
jNaNjaG.png


Logged back into horizons, and..
CU9iUfb.png

now *that* I can land on
 
Back
Top Bottom