War in LFT 37

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
But at least RSM are known in the Galaxy. You lot are like the pre-ejaculate during foreplay. Annoying, but don't really bring much to the table and soon forgotten...

oh oh big words from ONE pilot. show up and then talk

- - - Updated - - -

Why not? Cause you splashed with it. Btw my video is called "Elite Dangerous - Why I love gravity" and again thanks for the advertisement. ANd yes youare right, its quite entertaining. :)

OOC: i will send you an invoice
icon_mrgreen.gif
 
oh oh big words from ONE pilot. show up and then talk

Oh my sweet summer child, I've been there most nights when the Paladins have been hiding away like the cowardly dogs that they are. They even tried ganking me. Then we evened up the numbers and gave them a lesson
 
Oh my sweet summer child, I've been there most nights when the Paladins have been hiding away like the cowardly dogs that they are. They even tried ganking me. Then we evened up the numbers and gave them a lesson

ah yes you are right our database says this...

PalConBOT - Heute um 18:17 Uhr
CMD BREAKSPEAR :exclamation: Hostile from THE GUILD OF REBUY-SCREENIUS MAXIMUS (34 members)

hmmm i didnt see you in CG nor in the war at Alrai a few days ago. ah you are a Pve Cmdr from RSM. now i have the answer...
smiley_emoticons_fressepolieren.gif
 
Sorry for late reply...
So it basically took 4 posts to start a flame war and insults...thx Ant_Solo.

Post was about us, I don't think it is unreasonable that we respond.

And I would have called it a bit of spirited ribbing on both sides rather than a flame war. ;)
 
Post was about us, I don't think it is unreasonable that we respond.

And I would have called it a bit of spirited ribbing on both sides rather than a flame war. ;)

Agreed, and I find the ribbing to be in good spirits for the most part.

Hopefully, I'll be able to make it tonight. I fought your Wing Commander and lost the battle in very quick order. He fought honorably and is very skilled.

Losing my FDL to you would be an honor as well. Hopefully, I'll take a ring from your shields. ;)
 
you have been splashed repeatedly and i have. its part of it all. so what. but you cannot and will not stop the avalanche [alien]

CMDR, I think you're accusing the wrong pilot here. Since you're so proud about your database, let me show you ours. Does this look like RedHot got splashed repeatedly?

fDFGN88.jpg


Now bow down to the glorious RoA Bot.

PS: It only counts PvP kills, but also PvE deaths
 
Last edited:
Sorry what? I'm not sure what you mean?! I was ganked, but fortunately enough I know when to leave
It is really that hard to understand your own words?
I'll try to explain. You attack and kill traders - non combat ships - and call others griefers and gankers.
I'm sure your next post will prove that this discussion will go in circles of who attacked whom first and of course you are the victim here.

Post was about us, I don't think it is unreasonable that we respond.
And I would have called it a bit of spirited ribbing on both sides rather than a flame war. ;)
Noone was named in the post.
Fine with me, call it spritited ribbing then. ;)
 
I'll try to explain. You attack and kill traders - non combat ships - and call others griefers and gankers.
I'm sure your next post will prove that this discussion will go in circles of who attacked whom first and of course you are the victim here.

Shooting ships is not griefing regardless of if they are non-combat ships.

Even if we used the definition of griefer as shooting trade ships without a reason (which still isn't griefing) it is clear that we don't do that. We are at war, all Paladin ships are targets.

Just to be clear the Paladins also shoot at RSM trade ships but we aren't daft enough to get killed.

As for ganking, while there are times that we will outnumber you we are just as happy fighting with fewer than you and that happens just as often.

Ganking carried the implication that greater numbers are required to win and fights are not engaged unless they are present, that is certainly not RSM but it does sound a little like some other groups you know ;)
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom