Sorry that I've lost your respect. Let me explain my point of view:
For the longest time, I was very much against the idea that Cassiopeia A had ANYTHING to do with the Formidine Rift mystery. Many Commanders had gone out looking for it and found nothing. Some time around October I began looking through my notes regarding the Rift and found Cassiopeia A once again. I realized that it had never been totally ruled out so ... I submitted an article to Galnet news about a non-existent expedition to go and find it. I fully expected that the article would be rejected and that would be the end of that. If, however, Frontier actually published the article then it would be an indicator that there just might be something to Cas A after all.
They published the article. I was stunned, quite honestly. All of a sudden I had an expedition to plan.
Long story made short, at the end of the expedition attempts were made to get feedback from Frontier Developments about the omission. I never heard anything back. Prior bug reports also have been forgotten and ignored.
At a certain point you have to decide whether what you are seeing in-game is intended or not. We had a similar moment when it came to the "disappearing Heart Nebula" (or was it Soul?). Thankfully this was rather quickly addressed by the QA team and we were told to dismiss it. We never had that with Cassiopeia A.
Now, you said that "They down owe ... anyone an answer to every conceivable irregularity" and, you're right. They do, however, owe us some kind of feedback when it directly involves content surrounding these "mysteries" that they have us hunting. How many days did we experience the crash to desktop problem in EAFOTS, Hawkins Gap and the Conflux? In the middle of a CG centered around these locations we got tangled in a bug and the bug reporting process wasn't giving us any answers. Thankfully, Drew rescued us from the insanity of that situation.
When I announced that I had "solved" the Formidine Rift it was largely out of utter frustration that, what I had hoped to be the final nail in Cassiopeia A's coffin, was once again going ignored. This is my fault. I thought that the right way to go about proving that Cassiopeia A had nothing to do with the Formidine Rift was to pursue the theory in-game and interactively via Galnet which is really the only in-game method of pinging theories off the game developers. So yeah. As far as I was concerned, and to my own satisfaction, Cassiopeia A was "IT". Without a way of differentiating between a simple omission and intentional content I decided to just go with what my own eyes had seen. I was done with it.
It wasn't until later, after hearing the frustration from some of the guys who helped me on the Cassiopeia Project, that it occurred to me to just ask the question directly on the Canonn's thread. Boom. Seconds later a direct answer from Michael Brookes and that last nail in Cassiopeia A's coffin was driven home.
No. They don't owe me an answer to every irregularity but if they are going to post my question to Galnet then I think at that point it becomes reasonable for me to assume that an answer would be forthcoming. For me, I'm just glad that Cassiopeia A is finally off the table and I don't really care how that came about. I'm just glad it is done.
I'm sorry to have lost everyone's respect in the process but: TL;DR if Frontier hadn't willing posted my Cassiopeia Expedition Galnet submission we wouldn't be having this conversation. They created an expectation that they apparently weren't willing to deliver on.
No problem, just thougt you were trying to rattle FD's cage a little. Which is something that definitely needs doing, there continually appears to be a hiccup in their QA/storyline+galnet management processes.