Posted similar theory yersterday with inserted tetrahedron. Still need to translate it into coordinates to allow ppl for search.
It's not so hard. Need only a radius of 1B.
Posted similar theory yersterday with inserted tetrahedron. Still need to translate it into coordinates to allow ppl for search.
What's the orbital period of the moon? It appears to rise,go directly over & set at viewpoints on the ruins ( from reading through the thread posts). Has anyone followed the setting moon around the planet?
see here there was a bit of brainstorming over in the Explorers' forum when the ruins first appeared. Frawd did a lot of analysis.
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/306216-The-Alien-Ruins-Mengy-s-stellar-map-theory-for-your-enjoyment?p=4806569&viewfull=1#post4806569
Ok going out on a limb here, but has anyone thought of checking the crash site planets for ruins? Obviously those ships were there for a reason...
It's not so hard. Need only a radius of 1B.
Thanks, but nearly all that thread was prior to the 2.2.03 update & before the obelisks became active, FD could have slipped anything into that update, like altering the ruins site for a start
You sure that 9 was received in solo?
As MB stated that the result U get in solo-mode would be the intended result, it has to be assumed that there are 101/13=7,769 sites, means 7 or 8 sites in total, depending on how many information each contains (by intended FD model)It's so thrilling to watch you all finding the right hints to solve the puzzle.
Proseeding on the assumption that we discovered 2/3 of the ancient network ruins we still need to find the remaining two. These are 1/3 and 3/3. So I assume that we are to be able to find these locations based on the given data. Therefore our site 2/3 must carry the coordinates of sites 1/3 and 3/3. On the same conlusion site 1/3 must have the coordinates of 2/3 and 3/3 and site 3/3 must have the coordinates of 1/3 and 2/3. Since it is clear to me that finding our site 2/3 was only pure chance and Xdeath. But we could also have found 1/3 or 3/3 first.
Am I totally wrong, any thoughts?
It's a direct violation of forum rules. It will be removed by the mods. Don't reply to it.
As this is not the first site that was intended to be discovered who's to say that only the first ruins reveal the location of the other sites!
Also I have been in Solo myself for over 2 weeks trying different combinations and have had no success but I have been able to get different responses to the Relics buy removing them one at a time on a fresh un-scanned Ruins and have noticed other towers either not having their relic to also towers with their relic removed respawning but this may all just be a bug in the system.
Tomorrow I will set waypoints using Relic towers and set compass markers to try locate in vain any other ruins on the surface.
That should kill a few hours!
CMDR Q!!!!
Furiously reported MiVA.
And guys, please, DO NOT QUOTE HIM!