So you want to know about the Formidine Rift? (Part 3)

What if the search for the sites is like a deliberate "wall" to prevent us from reaching too much progress, because the next step might not be even ready yet...? So thats why they are so bloody hard to find...
 
We are basically searching for the needle in a haystack. However, after Horizon came out the haystack contains even more haystacks. We are quite certain that the FD also made the needle look like a piece of hay. [weird]

I dunno maybe Drew and Fdev aren't completely heartless, as has been suggested if we knew what they were up to we'd have a clue where the bases are. Ignoring that and going with what we have we should be looking for 12 bases assuming we're missing a beacon in the conflux so a 3x4 square of data and just looking at latitude without throwing in type agri, mining or comms or greek a b g d we got,,,

h -9 -26 xxx 51
c -7 xxx xxx xxx
r xxx -23 -34 xxx

for the latitudes of the known bases.

So as a scratch card what range of numbers would you expect under those.
 
Last edited:
We get that the tools we have are not suited but when things to find or w/e that makes the thread move abit, it gets abit annoying when the last 2-3 pages have been about what's lacking in the game or people moaning. Yup it sucks right now but this is how missed post get missed. Having been at the Delta planet (rift) for a good 3 days now you definitely start to go abit crazy. All i see in my sleep is yellow and craters, yellow and craters ;)
 
Last edited:
Yes, that what I was trying to do asking pilots to help : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ybon23PwwD5HWrHqDfRWPhvGUAOZkM3SN5fJ6-xIYFo/edit?usp=sharing



Nope, being on any pole you pick up any longitude you like, ideally stick to the one that is sunny at the moment




You are confusing bearing with coordinates - bearing - middle top of your HUD - 0 takes you to north pole :)
Opps, nearly overlooked this :eek:
Re table, ah yea that's it :), I think Sterlino had made 1 too.

Re bearing, ah ok, think I've got it now ;), I need to go ingame & have a look.....
.
What about racer1's point of 1° of longitude being too wider a strip for big planets?
 
Last edited:
We get that the tools we have are not suited but when things to find or w/e that makes the thread move abit, it gets abit annoying when the last 2-3 pages have been about what's lacking in the game or people moaning. Yup it sucks right now but this is how missed post get missed. Having been at the Delta planet (rift) for a good 3 days now you definitely start to go abit crazy. All i see in my sleep is yellow and craters, yellow and craters ;)

lucky you. all I see in my sleep is endless maze of canyons in my sleep and the odd nightmare of thruster failure on this 1.34G world.
 
lucky you. all I see in my sleep is endless maze of canyons in my sleep and the odd nightmare of thruster failure on this 1.34G world.

I crashed my ship yesterday on EAFOTS GL-YE2 6 due to the high gravity.... after a first shock, I felt almost relieved ; )
 
Last edited:
lucky you. all I see in my sleep is endless maze of canyons in my sleep and the odd nightmare of thruster failure on this 1.34G world.

I started listening to reclamations while out here. Only problem is I can't see for listening and I can't listen for seeing, I'll completely miss a chapter for staring at the screen hoping something will appear. Or miss a 200km wide crater BC I'm too focused on a juicy bit in reclamations :)
 
Heh really? :)

I added another image into the spoiler in my post.

How about now - one would think it will be visible from 2.5 km :)

o7jYiB0.png

That why I said searching on dark side is pretty much pointless....
 
Last edited:
Yes, that what I was trying to do asking pilots to help : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ybon23PwwD5HWrHqDfRWPhvGUAOZkM3SN5fJ6-xIYFo/edit?usp=sharing



Nope, being on any pole you pick up any longitude you like, ideally stick to the one that is sunny at the moment




You are confusing bearing with coordinates - bearing - middle top of your HUD - 0 takes you to north pole.
OK, I reedited my OP as it was actually bit confusing at places - sorry about that :)

Cool well I'm at GL-Y E2 6 and taking -44 longitude. 3km height, max speed 308m/s and 419m/s boost.
 
Here's an example for one of the Hawkin's Gap sites...

Can you see the site? Look closely, I promise you it's right there below you!

http://i.imgur.com/NN8MzoJ.jpg

Now look at this...


If you have shadows turned on in the graphics settings you would not even see it.

How ridiculous is that? This the stupid we have to deal with. It's hard enough as it is.

The amount of time we are being asked to search such huge areas and you literally won't see it if you have shadows on.

Think about that, if you've spent hours upon hours searching, like many of us have, you might have flown right over it but missed it because shadows were on.

Well... it upsets me anyway.

Agreed, the fear of looking away for 5 seconds or it being out off the edge of the screen is a tad disheartening. #understatement

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, that what I was trying to do asking pilots to help : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ybon23PwwD5HWrHqDfRWPhvGUAOZkM3SN5fJ6-xIYFo/edit?usp=sharing



Nope, being on any pole you pick up any longitude you like, ideally stick to the one that is sunny at the moment




You are confusing bearing with coordinates - bearing - middle top of your HUD - 0 takes you to north pole.
OK, I reedited my OP as it was actually bit confusing at places - sorry about that :)

If you're flying a line of longitude, how far can you be see either side of it?
 
Here's an example for one of the Hawkin's Gap sites...

Can you see the site? Look closely, I promise you it's right there below you!


If you have shadows turned on in the graphics settings you would not even see it.

How ridiculous is that? This the stupid we have to deal with. It's hard enough as it is.

The amount of time we are being asked to search such huge areas and you literally won't see it if you have shadows on.

Think about that, if you've spent hours upon hours searching, like many of us have, you might have flown right over it but missed it because shadows were on.

Well... it upsets me anyway.


As if it wasn't already clear that Frontier aren't the brightest bunch...
 
I'm just trying to find the settlement on LZ-H, & even though we have the co-ords, I just can't use them to find it.
I need (approx.) -23 & -175, I'm at -28 & -159 (which I got their by trial & error), I just don't know which way I need to point!
I think I get the bearing display now, but it doesn't help to get me there!
 
I think so.

If you think of it this way.

Right now we are put in a position where we have to search 16 moons/planets running something around 120,000,000km^2 each.

We are being asked to find what is effectively a tiny dot on a surface with shadows and surface textures which hide such tiny dots.

So you sit there for 4 hours watching a barren landscape flyby. And in all honesty because of how monotonous it is, and how small the thing you are looking for is, there's a good chance you fly over it and miss it anyway.

We are in a position where even a CMDR who's checked an area can't really say with any certainty that it wasn't there.

So players are now having to lower their graphics settings just to reduce the risk of flying over it and not missing it.

What the chuff do graphics settings have to do with the game??? It's just players being forced to work around a missing game mechanic in order to achieve the next to impossible.

So as a *BARE MINIMUM* take that component, the need to lower graphics and add a mechanic so players don't need to do this.

A simple mechanic where if you come within 30 odd km it's highlighted, you then take out the ridiculous need for players to change settings and the hugely frustrating risk of the timewaste that is players literally flying over things and just not being able to see them and/or missing them.

There has been a fair amount of discussion over the last two days on the Canonn ninth threadnaught ("Alien archeology and other mysteries") about this current lack of planetary surface search capability, so I've taken the liberty of posting a set of suggestions/requirements from that thread on the suggestions forum.
 
I'm just trying to find the settlement on LZ-H, & even though we have the co-ords, I just can't use them to find it.
I need (approx.) -23 & -175, I'm at -28 & -159 (which I got their by trial & error), I just don't know which way I need to point!
I think I get the bearing display now, but it doesn't help to get me there!

http://www.hotdoy.ca/edbearing/

Plug in your numbers and get your bearing to follow to get you there. Great tool.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom