What with all the avatar editors and the in-game-lore-stores it's no wonder they never got around to making a proper surface scanner ... by 3301 
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
He wants to track wich one he missed. Now he can compare the sheet with his inbox. Problem solved. No need to talk like that. No rep for you.
im en route... moon is a must have. and if we have no tool for good scanning why not start by the same coordinates arenged for geometric like -30 and -129
good luck CMDR's
good luck CMDR's
If you mean system map screenshots, they are on the FP. Otherwise, don't know.
I will be there in 2 hours - I logged out at the ruins last night. So when I get home and log in, thats where I'll be
EDIT: Cannot brain, has the dumb! Meene, not Synuefe wasname thingy with ruins site one! Doh.
Last edited:
Basing off of similarities and distinct qualities of the current site I used EDSM to look at the listed sites. I looked for bodies with a Orbital period and rotational period opposite each other and if possible a moon.
My theory is that the orbital period and rotational period makes it easier to "align" the monolith network with its galactic neighbors
I've compiled everything into one post here
Synuefe ZL-J d10-119
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/8850999/name/Synuefe+ZL-J+d10-119
Star Class:F
Body of interest
Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 13 c - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...s/idB/1709550/nameB/Synuefe+ZL-J+d10-119+13+c
Orbital period: 3.7
Rotational period: -3.7
Moon: Yes
-----------
Synuefe XO-P c22-17
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/9084912/name/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17
Star Class:K
Bodies of interest
Synuefe XO-P c22-17 AB 1 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...ls/idB/1709906/nameB/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17+AB+1
Orbital period: 15.7
Rotational period: -15.7
Moon: No
Synuefe XO-P c22-17 AB 3 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...ls/idB/1708999/nameB/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17+AB+3
Orbital period: 88.5
Rotational period: -88.5
Moon: Yes
Synuefe XO-P c22-17 D 1 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...ils/idB/1710362/nameB/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17+D+1
Orbital period: 4.9
Rotational period: -4.9
Moon: No
-----------
IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/9084820/name/IC+2391+Sector+ZE-A+d101
Star Class:F
Body of Interest
None in this system have the odd orbital period/rotation but there's only 1 landable body that has a moon
IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101 C 3 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...dB/1709320/nameB/IC+2391+Sector+ZE-A+d101+C+3
Orbital period: 7.5
Rotational period: 7.5
Moon: Yes
-----------
IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/6785168/name/IC+2391+Sector+GW-V+b2-4
Star Class: M
Body of interest:
None in this system have the odd orbital period/rotation but here's the only landable body that has a moon
IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4 B 1 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...dB/1710216/nameB/IC+2391+Sector+GW-V+b2-4+B+1
Orbital period: 22.7
Rotational period: 22.7
Moon: Yes
My theory is that the orbital period and rotational period makes it easier to "align" the monolith network with its galactic neighbors
I've compiled everything into one post here
Synuefe ZL-J d10-119
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/8850999/name/Synuefe+ZL-J+d10-119
Star Class:F
Body of interest
Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 13 c - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...s/idB/1709550/nameB/Synuefe+ZL-J+d10-119+13+c
Orbital period: 3.7
Rotational period: -3.7
Moon: Yes
-----------
Synuefe XO-P c22-17
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/9084912/name/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17
Star Class:K
Bodies of interest
Synuefe XO-P c22-17 AB 1 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...ls/idB/1709906/nameB/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17+AB+1
Orbital period: 15.7
Rotational period: -15.7
Moon: No
Synuefe XO-P c22-17 AB 3 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...ls/idB/1708999/nameB/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17+AB+3
Orbital period: 88.5
Rotational period: -88.5
Moon: Yes
Synuefe XO-P c22-17 D 1 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...ils/idB/1710362/nameB/Synuefe+XO-P+c22-17+D+1
Orbital period: 4.9
Rotational period: -4.9
Moon: No
-----------
IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/9084820/name/IC+2391+Sector+ZE-A+d101
Star Class:F
Body of Interest
None in this system have the odd orbital period/rotation but there's only 1 landable body that has a moon
IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101 C 3 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...dB/1709320/nameB/IC+2391+Sector+ZE-A+d101+C+3
Orbital period: 7.5
Rotational period: 7.5
Moon: Yes
-----------
IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4
https://www.edsm.net/en/system/id/6785168/name/IC+2391+Sector+GW-V+b2-4
Star Class: M
Body of interest:
None in this system have the odd orbital period/rotation but here's the only landable body that has a moon
IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4 B 1 - https://www.edsm.net/en/system/bodi...dB/1710216/nameB/IC+2391+Sector+GW-V+b2-4+B+1
Orbital period: 22.7
Rotational period: 22.7
Moon: Yes
Those coordinates were already checked by several CMDRs on several bodies as you can see here.
Feel free to pick one that has not being checked and make your way there, CMDR.
Is there an optimal altitude to fly over a planet to find the ruins?
Wont hurt for them to be re-visited once the server re-starts are done and dusted.
Another Pic of all 4 New Systems in the Nightsky as seen from the Original Ruins looking up. Maybe it Helps someone figure smth out
http://imgur.com/a/13ixr
http://imgur.com/a/13ixr
You are right, CMDR. I only fear of having several CMDRs flying to check the same spot and we loose tracking.
Would be better if the ones that checked them before, execute the re-check.
- - - Updated - - -
Another Pic of all 4 New Systems in the Nightsky as seen from the Original Ruins looking up. Maybe it Helps someone figure smth out
http://imgur.com/a/13ixr
This one is even better, CMDR!
I wonder if they change when a different set of beacons are activated.
I believe someone mentioned between 2km-4km (unless this server update added a POI for your radar). It would be nice if we had in-game binoculars.
Last edited:
I'll put a star by the ones I've not re-checked since the restart.
Found some nice canyons, shame I didn't bring my Courier, but that's it so far.
Now if we could just get some super smart person to plot their arcs through the sky to see if one of them lines up with the arrow made by the ruins.
I'm betting one of them does, and i'd bet that it does when those other gaps in the rings are pointing to other "landmarks" in the night sky.
The point of looking for Tidal locking is to find sites that can constantly face a star of importance.
Ozric
Volunteer Moderator
Last edited:
- Status