FWIW, the Phloem Excretion will give you Very Rare materials.
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
FWIW, the Phloem Excretion will give you Very Rare materials.
Dang it, some fumaroles got me excited for a moment. At least I got some rare mats...
I am at this location on this particular planet and there's nothing like that here. I can't see anything but shadows and rocks. I'm on a PC. Screenshot is here. You can see that I'm in the correct locations from the coordinates, but the C3A is cut-off. But I am there.
http://imgur.com/gallery/gi9kfmI
Edit: Oops. I fail reading comprehension. I'm on C3, not C3A. Sorry
Last edited:
Back again before bed with a new theory on potential locations for ruin sites on planets...
If anyone can add this theory to a fancy compass overlay with all the bearings, that would be amazing!
So, here it is:
If anyone can put a proper compass over that, and apply my theory to it, we might have something in the way of co-ordinates.
You'll notice the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the image - I think these could be, based on their positions and proximity:
1: Synuefe ZL-J D10-119 11 B
2: Synuefe XO-P C22-17 D 1
3: IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4 (planet: ???)
4: IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101 (planet: ???)
The reason I include the IC 2391 Sector systems is because, if there are 4 sites in 4 systems, then perhaps my anti-clockwise hypothesis, below, may not be entirely accurate - at least, not for all planets. Other criteria may apply, such as Axial Tilt that is negative (minus) - so check those out and see if any are similar the Ancient Ruins we already know of.
AGAIN - if anyone can apply a latitude/longitude compass overlay to the ruins and get accurate co-ordinates based on my theory, we could be on to something - all 4 of these co-ordinates on all planets could be done in a day or two EASY - we just need to know the most accurate latitude/longitude numbers from my image as most of it was guess work in paint.
Thanks all, see you tomorrow!
If anyone can add this theory to a fancy compass overlay with all the bearings, that would be amazing!
So, here it is:
If anyone can put a proper compass over that, and apply my theory to it, we might have something in the way of co-ordinates.
You'll notice the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the image - I think these could be, based on their positions and proximity:
1: Synuefe ZL-J D10-119 11 B
2: Synuefe XO-P C22-17 D 1
3: IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4 (planet: ???)
4: IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101 (planet: ???)
The reason I include the IC 2391 Sector systems is because, if there are 4 sites in 4 systems, then perhaps my anti-clockwise hypothesis, below, may not be entirely accurate - at least, not for all planets. Other criteria may apply, such as Axial Tilt that is negative (minus) - so check those out and see if any are similar the Ancient Ruins we already know of.
AGAIN - if anyone can apply a latitude/longitude compass overlay to the ruins and get accurate co-ordinates based on my theory, we could be on to something - all 4 of these co-ordinates on all planets could be done in a day or two EASY - we just need to know the most accurate latitude/longitude numbers from my image as most of it was guess work in paint.
Thanks all, see you tomorrow!
Last edited:
Oh yeah I see what your saying and your probably right as it's not an exact match. But there are low mass L, T or Y class stars in each system and that is what I was getting at, and I believe all 3 are classified as Dwarf stars. I suppose Ill still start my search there anyways tho. Thanks!
That's cool. I'm going to spend some time around here... see if there's something around here.
Thank you, and your friend!
That's them yes..
I like the theory, that ruins = map. But it also can be radio telescope like РАТАН-600 in Russia. All ruins can be aimed each and form a network
Learning that the original ruin system is almost directly overhead is a good sign
keep us updated CMDR! o7
Ok, been to the coords on c3a, cant see the plants. im gonna try the other side of the planet to double confirm
While it's a massive waste of time scouring the surfaces of planets where there are so many possible planets, has anyone flown around exploring the nearby systems looking for comms beacons?
Always a small chance FD put in their new way of narrowing down searches because it really would take a miracle for anyone to find one of these bases without hints.
Always a small chance FD put in their new way of narrowing down searches because it really would take a miracle for anyone to find one of these bases without hints.
Among the many unanswered questions the one that keeps nagging me is - why are the ruins located at that particular latitude? In terms of what you can see in the night sky longitude is pretty irrelevant - but latitude divides the sky into stuff you can see and stuff you can't. Presumably this site could have been located practically anywhere on that body ... if the placing was deliberate then why was that latitude chosen? Unless of course it is just a number which the RNG barfed out (which in my jaded state of mind seems an equally likely explanation). If it is RNG then it really is a depressing prospect as there would be no hope to apply any such method to find other sites.
It was a cluster of containers -.-
moving around coords doing a quick sweep. Will move on to other sets of coords after.
I do want to remind people, just cause i found nothing here does not mean the coords are wrong, i could be on the wrong planet.
Also, what is the margin of error with these calculated coordinates?
moving around coords doing a quick sweep. Will move on to other sets of coords after.
I do want to remind people, just cause i found nothing here does not mean the coords are wrong, i could be on the wrong planet.
Also, what is the margin of error with these calculated coordinates?
- Status