So by "in game based" he could mean "we'll give you a CG every couple of weeks until we're done"
Yup. Sit and spin till FD handholds. Time for a vacation from this nonsense. At least I named the trees.lol
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
Yup. Sit and spin till FD handholds. Time for a vacation from this nonsense. At least I named the trees.lol
That's exactly what I'm trying to do. I'll see if I can upload the page somewhere later today (have to head to a doctors appointment)
I'm there now, exploring a few of the craters near the site, but nothing so far.
Just a random search, whilst I ruminate.
Last edited:
Thank you. What graphics setting did you use for this? I'm trying to get some idea of what the ruins look like using the low setting as some people are implying that it is easier to see them
I'm heading there right now aswell since i've kind of given up on the planets i've been flying around at the destinations of Ram Tah.
I did notice that those brain trees show up as a little purple dot on the radar when flying above around 1km height over it.
Since I have no better idea while trying to catch up with thread I'll just quickly drop this one, because I don't remember if it was discussed.
In original ruins the upper spaces are more narrow in their nature and the one on 8 o'clock is round like sphere. I saw it first time more clearly when someone put old and new layout of ruins on each other on shots taken from side direction.
Not sure but I think it is interesting.
View attachment 113687
In original ruins the upper spaces are more narrow in their nature and the one on 8 o'clock is round like sphere. I saw it first time more clearly when someone put old and new layout of ruins on each other on shots taken from side direction.
Not sure but I think it is interesting.
View attachment 113687
So by "in game based" he could mean "we'll give you a CG every couple of weeks until we're done"
He could. Or he could also mean "we'll put the clues in, and if they don't find them in a timely manner, do a CG to kickstart things, and some more to keep things moving, as we decide is neccessary". As may already have happened.
A whole lot of coulda, sorta, maybe.
We can sit here and second guess MB's/FD's intent, or try to brute force it*, or take what we've got and try to figure it out*, or leave it until further developments occur one way or another, and go do something else instead (in ED or otherwise). Of course, flip-flopping histrionically from one to the other is also an option ;D
*warning, may not actually be do-able, so if you don't enjoy it regardless of outcome, stick to more satisfying activities!
Last edited:
Okay, heres the spectrogram of the audio i just collected at the coordinates:
(5 Minutes of data)
Then you can compare that to the ruins from 7.5 km altitude (10 minutes of data)
I would like to point out that there are horizontal lines that are are stacked in both, though at the ruins they are longer
(5 Minutes of data)
Then you can compare that to the ruins from 7.5 km altitude (10 minutes of data)
I would like to point out that there are horizontal lines that are are stacked in both, though at the ruins they are longer
Last edited:
I have just been sat thinking about this whilst waiting for my daughter to finish her ballet lesson (getting funny looks because I also have a paper printout of the ruins map and lots of paper with calculations on them
The simplest method to find intersecting objects is to wait at the ruins and see what objects pass directly overhead at the surface normal (90° straight up).
Unfortunately, from my time spent looking into the various factors, I'm fairly confident that none of the local bodies do this.
However, one of Ram Tah's 'clues' is about the look of the waxing and waning moon. I don't recall seeing the moon (when viewed from the ruins) appear to have any terminator (the line between lit and shadow portions). Anyone got any shots showing it?
Anyway, my point in mentioning it is that the site may not be positioned directly at an intersection of the arcs of stellar objects, but instead at such a position that the moon (and perhaps local star?) arc over the sky in a "Guardian-familiar" way. Calculating the correct point for this is tricky but not impossible.
o7
Excellent point. The moon used to rise and set nearly directly over the two circles of the Ruins but since its rotating it doesn't always do so.
As an aside, I'm at the Braintrees and if you shoot the "fruit" with a beam laser for a reasonable amount of time all the fruits (in the whole area not just the one you're shooting) give off a "glow" before turning off.
Don't know if it's a graphics glitch or a real phenomenon.
Don't know if it's a graphics glitch or a real phenomenon.
Looking at he ruins map, what if the circular mounds are not representing Planetary systems but actually Atomic descriptions?
The center is the nucleus with orbiting protons and electrons etc.
This may help narrow down which planets have these Elements etc etc.
Maybe the outer wall represents a connection of a Molecule/Compound?
Any Chemists in the house?
Last edited:
Got bored scanning the moon D4 A at IC 2391 Sector GW-V b2-4 so went to IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101 C3 A to look for brain trees
[video]http://plays.tv/video/588caa1b2445437727/frawd-digger-visits-the-brain-trees-on-c3-a?from=user[/video]
Also met my old friend Iron Orchid while there:
[video]http://plays.tv/video/588cab1322c60b911c/frawd-digger-meets-old-friend-iron-orchid-on-c3-brain-tree-forest?from=user[/video]
Frawd
[video]http://plays.tv/video/588caa1b2445437727/frawd-digger-visits-the-brain-trees-on-c3-a?from=user[/video]
Also met my old friend Iron Orchid while there:
[video]http://plays.tv/video/588cab1322c60b911c/frawd-digger-meets-old-friend-iron-orchid-on-c3-brain-tree-forest?from=user[/video]
Frawd
I think that we are all focusing on the geometry of the ruins when we should be looking at the position/number of obelisks.
If we assume for a moment that this hunt was planned for quite a while and was all being put in place, with one ruin leading to another, it makes sense that if someone stumbled accross the wrong starting location (by trianglauting a photo from a promotional video) then we should also conclude that Fdev would need to tweak the hunt so that the starting ruins is now the one that has been found.
That being the case, what can we see has been changed between the old ruins originally found and the ones after the patch of 2.2.03 or whenever they changed them?
Well, the ruins themselves are intact, HOWEVER, the position and number of obelisks has changed.
therefore, If we treat the old and new ruins as both pointing to a different planet/coordinates we should be able to compare the 2 and find a pattern.
It's not a lot to go on, but I really think that the obilisks are the coords.
For reference:
OLD
_Is_the_Ancient_Ruins_a_Map.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20161122170755)
CURRENT
If we assume for a moment that this hunt was planned for quite a while and was all being put in place, with one ruin leading to another, it makes sense that if someone stumbled accross the wrong starting location (by trianglauting a photo from a promotional video) then we should also conclude that Fdev would need to tweak the hunt so that the starting ruins is now the one that has been found.
That being the case, what can we see has been changed between the old ruins originally found and the ones after the patch of 2.2.03 or whenever they changed them?
Well, the ruins themselves are intact, HOWEVER, the position and number of obelisks has changed.
therefore, If we treat the old and new ruins as both pointing to a different planet/coordinates we should be able to compare the 2 and find a pattern.
It's not a lot to go on, but I really think that the obilisks are the coords.
For reference:
OLD
I can only just make out the ruins on one of those pics.
Chandler says "Could this be anymore futile ?"
any noise with this? or just a glow?
Oh that's interesting!
@Rependant
What graphics settings please?
What graphics settings please?
- Status