Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

[frostypaw]

To be honest he was close... the site is just out of the -32/-32 range... like barely out so he was pretty close to accurate..

You couldn't even SEE the original site from the location he kept insisting it was actually in to make his crackpot theory fit, based on an image that made no sense with random numbers assigned to different lengths to make it work. AND that all based on rounding up/down numbers in an illogical way to force it into shape.

We need people to test their own theories and be able to explain and defend them, not just make stuff up and drag others into trying to prove it for you.

 

[CMDR Dreamstate]

To be honest he was close... the site is just out of the -32/-32 range... like barely out so he was pretty close to accurate..

+1

Unfortunately, unless it is 100.1% correct, people in this thread dismiss hypothesis

 

[dumbo]

Well, at least now we can say it's clearly not a map.

Not exactly...
- the ruins may contain a map/hint to something(s) other than a ruin site.
- the ruins may have no real purpose whatsoever.
- the ruins may contain map(s)/hint(s) to all of the ruin sites.

The only thing that we seem to have discovered is that the ruins aren't chained together. (e.g. ruin A is a map to ruin B which is a map to ruin C - that is not the case).

 

[CMDR Dreamstate]

I would like to add... that seeing as it was really close to his coord calculations we just need to search wider around those coords he calculated.. i have a feeling the next one will he around them

I hope so at this stage I feel like the numbers need validating more than ever.

 

[Factabulous]

I just got this image in my head of all the ppl in this thread screaming as they go into every space station:

"THIS STATION IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE LAST! BUGGED!"

Amyway this system is pretty spread out, wish I hadn't decided to scan it before visiting the ruins. I had though there was no rush (as it is dark), but now I know it always will be dark there's no point in waiting

 

[Pumabear8]

I don't know whether the alpha is a copy of the beta or the beta is a copy of alpha, but it seems to me the open/pg bug was also copied considering we're still able to leech, I arrived with artifacts from the other site, within moments of others arriving I got 1 million cr, not from anything I scanned, I'm now at 6 million while trying to find something different about this site, only difference so far, it's located on a different ball of mud at different coordinates.

 

[CMDRDethalis]

I feel like The guardians like lots of old pioneers in the old days of the irl world... use landmarks aka bernards loop, the moon, the star, etc as a way to navigate... thus they chose sites that have the same navigational features so they can relate that to where to go...

 

[BL1P]

You couldn't even SEE the original site from the location he kept insisting it was actually in to make his crackpot theory fit, based on an image that made no sense with random numbers assigned to different lengths to make it work. AND that all based on rounding up/down numbers in an illogical way to force it into shape.

We need people to test their own theories and be able to explain and defend them, not just make stuff up and drag others into trying to prove it for you.

Crackpot Ideas you say ?

Spoiler

 

[CMDRDethalis]

To add to that... this is why the coords calculated by another cmdr are so close to accurate

 

[frostypaw]

I feel like The guardians like lots of old pioneers in the old days of the irl world... use landmarks aka bernards loop, the moon, the star, etc as a way to navigate... thus they chose sites that have the same navigational features so they can relate that to where to go...

Good lord man they're a space faring race. They probably know where the site is from it's transmissions the moment they jumped into the system.

We don't find our bases navigating by the stars - why on earth (or any other habitable world) would a more advanced race go back to using a sextant?

ps. this is starting to look weird. the coordinates are not close.

 

[Zieman]

Here are the earlier posts:
Cmdr Thatchinho: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/300054-Alien-archeology-and-other-mysteries-Thread-9-The-Canonn?p=5044567&viewfull=1#post5044567
Notice the triangular glyphs in photo 3
Cmdr Megacracker: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/300054-Alien-archeology-and-other-mysteries-Thread-9-The-Canonn?p=5073843&viewfull=1#post5073843
My hypothesis post: https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/300054-Alien-archeology-and-other-mysteries-Thread-9-The-Canonn?p=5075847&viewfull=1#post5075847

Those pix are really good, many thanks. Can you confirm they are of the four different relics on the pillars at the site? The glyphs look identical in these whereas I thought I could see differences between them in those pictures of Thatchinho & Megacracker

I finally got to arrange and upload the relic pillar base glyph pictures:
http://imgur.com/a/Oc9MH

Relevance to the second set of ruins: easy to check if they're identical there...

BTW, I'm not surprised that the ruis are pretty much identical, but if the default obelisks and their data are the same, I might be a bit disappointed.

 

[CMDR Dreamstate]

You couldn't even SEE the original site from the location he kept insisting it was actually in to make his crackpot theory fit, based on an image that made no sense with random numbers assigned to different lengths to make it work. AND that all based on rounding up/down numbers in an illogical way to force it into shape.

We need people to test their own theories and be able to explain and defend them, not just make stuff up and drag others into trying to prove it for you.

I did explain it once already a long time ago - but nobody cared or remembered.

EDIT: People suggested at the time, though not in the picture because it was a thread discussion, should they also search 32x32 and 64x64 and I said yes that is also possible so check them if you want.

EDIT 2: The text at the bottom-right is now disproved, and I'm happy with that. The more we know the better!

I used a compass and used measurements to come up with those numbers - the picture I have been spamming is just the simple version because people have NO attention spans, they just want something to test.

Why don't you read the text on the left-hand side?

I did say, in my image, "allow for margin of error" and "check within a degree or two in both latitude/longitude" - and, oh look, new ruins miraculously found at -29 -30.

 

[ChemicalBR0]

thats not how tidal locking works. (it wont always be night at any point on any planet or moon, unless its a rogue planet and there's no star

take the earth and moon for example.. the moon takes a 27 days to rotate on its axis it also takes 27 days to orbit the earth (hence the same side is always visible to us.)

the moon is still rotating on its axis so the sun does still rise and set and light the entire surface of the moon eventually (it just means that its day is 27 earth days long).


sorry I've not piped anything into this before (coz i got nothing on the search for ancient ruins)
think of it this way, how do you think the "dark side of the moon" looks during a solar eclipse or new moon phase?

 

[HamishUK]

There's the same "clock" below the alpha site

It has been explained before it is not a clock it is part of the game mechanism to raise the towers.

 

[Hironichu]

if you have anything to do now, please confirmed this if you can agree with me https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/325677-Ruins-missions-Second-site-found-Frontier-its-time-to-tell-us-what-s-wrong?p=5079960#post5079960 Because I dont think we can go further now..

 

[Garp]

+1

Unfortunately, unless it is 100.1% correct, people in this thread dismiss hypothesis

Like anti-clockwise is almost clockwise. You were 100% sure about that.

You never responded to the fact that the prime meridian is randomly determined.

All that is left from your theory is that 32 is almost 29.x. That's not enough.

 

[666Savior]

Quick question, the black squares of ground, i know thats normal when dropping in but is it normal if you've been flying steadily at 2km?

 

[CMDR Dreamstate]

Like anti-clockwise is almost clockwise. You were 100% sure about that.

You never responded to the fact that the prime meridian is randomly determined.

All that is left from your theory is that 32 is almost 29.x. That's not enough.

pffff.

Garb, ever contributed something?

 

[Pumabear8]

I did explain it once already a long time ago - but nobody cared or remembered.

EDIT: People suggested at the time, though not in the picture because it was a thread discussion, should they also search 32x32 and 64x64 and I said yes that is also possible so check them if you want.

I used a compass and used measurements to come up with those numbers - the picture I have been spamming is just the simple version because people have NO attention spans, they just want something to test.

Why don't you read the text on the left-hand side?

I did say, in my image "allow for margin of error" and "check within a degree or two in both latitude/longitude" - and, oh look, new ruins miraculously found at -29 -30.

Spoiler

http://i.imgur.com/hw0OoZJ.jpg

Just pointed this out, the newly found site has no F class in the system.

And please use spoiler tags to reduce clutter.

 

[frostypaw]

I did explain it once already a long time ago - but nobody cared or remembered.

EDIT: People suggested at the time, though not in the picture because it was a thread discussion, should they also search 32x32 and 64x64 and I said yes that is also possible so check them if you want.

EDIT 2: The text at the bottom-right is now disproved, and I'm happy with that. The more we know the better!

I used a compass and used measurements to come up with those numbers - the picture I have been spamming is just the simple version because people have NO attention spans, they just want something to test.

Why don't you read the text on the left-hand side?

I did say, in my image, "allow for margin of error" and "check within a degree or two in both latitude/longitude" - and, oh look, new ruins miraculously found at -29 -30.

http://i.imgur.com/hw0OoZJ.jpg

I repeat my question you ignored earlier when you posted this:

When the top blue/red bit is a length of 32 why are the green/orange ones 64 when they're clearly and obviously not.

Your random rounding up/down as convenient can't move the new ruins that much. It's just some random guesses and a load of text to try and give it authority like all kinds of conspiracy spam across the internet.