But OP is saying he wants a tickbox to enable/disable cmdr names.
And you are saying "look at the example of a forum avatar", and then you paint a picture where you can't kick people off the forums because of their avatar.
But there's a tickbox for forum avatars, so the correct solution is what OP wants.
So why are you going on about kicking people off the forum in your example? OP hasn't asked for that, he wants a tickbox!
Here from the first post :
Try again. [yesnod]
Let's say; for the fun of the example....
I don't like your avatar, it should be banned from from these forums, because it, and YOU with it, promotes sexual assault and murder.
It depicts a helmet used in war; and in all wars; sexual assault and murder follows.
Killing of children and so on.
And by using it as an avatar, you are manipulating younger players and forum users to sexually assault and murder.
Or....? [squeeeee]
If I actually claimed this about your avatar, I would be quite deranged - don't you think?
Only fear can render words dangerous or bad.
Words have no power, unless the receiver gives it powers
And why does such and such words have a so powerful place in your mind?
All we have to do is find out, in ourselves, where that fear derives from. [yesnod]
But OP is saying he wants a tickbox to enable/disable cmdr names. *i know you mean ship names*
There is already an option that shield you from the real people, its called "solo mode". Not only disables the ship names, but also the commander names too.
So there might be some ship names that you don't want to see? How do you cope in real life? People wearing T-shirts with all sorts of slogans and profanity, graffiti on walls, lyrics in songs you hear on the radio/stream, TV shows with content you don't like? Do you walk around looking at the ground in case you see something that you don't want to?
I think you've just got to ignore them and accept that some 'iffy' names will get through.
that's an interesting answer to a simple question, but ok, i'll bite.
in the 1st instance you have created an extreme example of sensitivity which is, for this venue, a very naive and immature construct, and here's why.. you are making the assumption, that anyone who uses this forum either, doesn't know its Elite Dangerous.. a game that has warring factions in space, battles for contested systems, and a primary focus on shooting at others.. or, that any person who may be sensitive to, or hold the feelings that your example portrays, have not checked the following..
Frontiers Code of Conduct for Elite Dangerous
and
Frontiers PEGI 7 rating for Elite Dangerous
the second part.. do you really not understand the influence and weight of ideas, and in particular, the 'words' used to express them?
words have given reason to all the ideas men have fought, killed, and died for, over the ages.. the good and the bad! that is in essence the very foundation of why freedom of speech is so important and exists in western civilisation.
Freedom of speech is a mechanism for The People, to manage the political climate of their country, and maintain those freedoms that have been hard fought for. As there are always several sides in any political discourse, the ability for a person to freely, and openly, take part in that discourse, with impunity, can be the difference between becoming an oppressive, or totalitarian system, and protecting against such.
so yeah, there is a rational reason to fear certain words, and the dialogue and context within which they are used, either to promote, or perpetuate, certain ideas.. not because those ideas appeal to you, but because you understand that those ideas appeal to others.
Freedom of speech only exists within the political sphere, it does not give any individual the right to misconduct, it does not allow the individual the right to force, or dictate their views, ideologies or attitudes on anyone (especially minors) and it does not allow for an individual to circumvent, or break, any rules to which they are bound, from membership to a private institution, organisation or community.
but yeah, as bitstorm says, if i did find something offensive in avatars, i would have the option to tick a box, in the case of finding something clearly against the forum rules, i would report it to a mod.
aside from that, this isnt what the OP is about, so lets leave that where it is
- - - Updated - - -
Then I am confused, what is your point then?
That forum avatars are ok and people should not try to have others banned for them?
I would support this, but only if its in exchange for removing all rules regarding ship naming.
What I mean is that I would like to name my ship whatever I'd like to without worrying about getting banned. If the trade off is the ability for people to hide other ship names, I'd be ok with it.
You can't filter stupid people in real life, so I would be against filtering ship names apart from the usual T&Cs (racist, sexist, -ists etc).
Maybe it made someone die a little bit inside?PS that said................ "Boaty Mc Boat Face" should never have been scrapped. Stupid name perhaps, but when you are daft enough to put something out for a vote without lots of smallprint , well you get what you deserve(some say the same about brexit)