Best my rig at stock can manage 

NVidia really kicks its customers in the lower back repeatedly, in both price and perfomance categories...
I recently updated from a GTX 970 to a GTX 1080ti and while i am enjoying the immense performance boost in VR, i am really happy, that i have waited and not payed the same money for a 1080 or even went for a Titan X...
NVidias behavior really leaves a bad taste...
Excessively and unnecessarily big box ?
Nah - must be the pic cos it's not really much bigger than the GPU
So the 1080 TI is already outdated again :O
Bit harsh also for the previous Titan X(Pascal) owners...
NVIDIA TITAN Xp (new!)
I read an article claiming players that shelled out $1200 USD for the Titan X (pascal) are sort of pee-d off, too. NVidia makes the Titan X, sells it for $1200 claiming it is the top-of-the-line NVidia GPU, then releases the 1080ti which performs just barely better but for $600 less, so NVidia releases another "Titan XP" the "official Titan X Pascal" GPU for another $1200 and it performs just a teensy bit better then the first two GPUs and now NVidia claims that is now the top-of-the-line NVidia GPU. If I had shelled out $1200 USD for the "top-of-the-line" GPU 3 months ago just to be superseded twice in a few weeks I would be P-O'd too.
I read an article claiming players that shelled out $1200 USD for the Titan X (pascal) are sort of pee-d off, too. NVidia makes the Titan X(p), sells it for $1200, then releases the 1080ti which performs just slightly better so they then release another "Titan XP" the "official Titan X Pascal" GPU for another $1200 and it performs just a teensy bit better then the first two GPUs.
I read an article claiming players that shelled out $1200 USD for the Titan X (pascal) are sort of pee-d off, too. NVidia makes the Titan X, sells it for $1200 claiming it is the top-of-the-line NVidia GPU, then releases the 1080ti which performs just barely better but for $600 less, so NVidia releases another "Titan XP" the "official Titan X Pascal" GPU for another $1200 and it performs just a teensy bit better then the first two GPUs and now NVidia claims that is now the top-of-the-line NVidia GPU. If I had shelled out $1200 USD for the "top-of-the-line" GPU 3 months ago just to be superseded twice in a few weeks I would be P-O'd too.
Excessively and unnecessarily big box ?
I read an article claiming players that shelled out $1200 USD for the Titan X (pascal) are sort of pee-d off, too. NVidia makes the Titan X, sells it for $1200 claiming it is the top-of-the-line NVidia GPU, then releases the 1080ti which performs just barely better but for $600 less, so NVidia releases another "Titan XP" the "official Titan X Pascal" GPU for another $1200 and it performs just a teensy bit better then the first two GPUs and now NVidia claims that is now the top-of-the-line NVidia GPU. If I had shelled out $1200 USD for the "top-of-the-line" GPU 3 months ago just to be superseded twice in a few weeks I would be P-O'd too.
I think thats why you need to buy one as soon as it comes out to get the best value from it. I have a new Titan XP, and I know that at some point this year they might release the next set of cards 1100s (?), if they bring out a new series every year that is. 680 was March 2012, 780 was in May 2013, 980 was September 2014, 1080 was May 2016. So Maybe 1180 end of this year. So will I be pee'd off nope. Nvidia hasn't forced me to buy it, and bringing out a new card is there business. Also there 700 series has three titans, so what's to say that if they delay the 1180 series until next year we won't see another Titan card.
oh I have no idea if the next series will be called 1180, but you know what I mean.