#support3rdparty - Why we temporarily shut down our sites.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
What more do you want? The OPost is a group post/action, it's their (the group's) official response. Should the OPoster ctrl+c ctrl+v so his forum name shows?

Exactly that. The statement is a unanimously agreement from our side and represents our statement as a group.
 
Frontier never asked third parties to make sites. You guys took it upon yourselves to do it. Going on strike is only going to annoy the player base and not FD.

On the plus side maybe people will learn how to use the in game tools for trading.

Which are those "in game tools for trading" that you are talking about? Where are they? Maybe you're still playing an older version of Elite?
 
Shutdown Support

I agree with the factual accuracy of statements along the lines of "You guys chose to be 3rd party developers, Frontier owes you nothing." However, playing ED without the 3rd party tools is an extremely different and more difficult experience. Given how little in-game information there is to access, the 3rd party tools are semi-mandatory to enjoy the full scope and breadth of the game. Playership would be very negatively impacted if the 3rd party tools went away, and as such Frontier should recognize that and provide more comms.

Does this sudden shutdown negatively impact ED for me? Absolutely! Point well made. I hope things work out so I continue to enjoy ED. Otherwise....not so much (and therefore probably not at all).

Thanks,
Nimitz68
 
Did.. you just tell me to shut up and not post my thoughts on anything?

I genuinely want to know why it is the 3rd party guys think that this new era of communication is going to go longer than Drew's event.

Why can't I ask that in a thread that's about that?

I do think you hammer a specific agenda with great zeal. But that is your right. I just put you on temp ignore when it bugs me and take you off after a few hours.

Ozric is clearly agitated, and I can understand. Best to just ignore.
 
After fully reading the OP, I'm starting to see why the sites may not be up again yet. You have to wonder if Frontier are giving their usual empty platitudes to placate the 3rd party tool community.
 
I just got in on my lunchbreak. Has the panic died down? It has? Evil Fdev been put in their place? Poor little underappreciated third party developers get enough attention? Great! Now can we all go back to our normally scheduled programming?
 
Last edited:
Not disagreeing with you at all about 3rd party devs WANTING us to use the tools.


Just making the observation that FD has no reason to be trusted at this point. They just want Drew's event to happen without any other problems.


That's why PC/Mac's got two rushed patches this week, right?

Perhaps you're right but I want to give the runner a chance. I trust Ed's words that Frontier will honor their end of the bargain. Time will tell...

- - - Updated - - -

I just got in on my lunchbreak. Has the panic died down? It has? Great! Now can we all go back to our normally scheduled programming?

Yes, more bit...ing, moaning and complaints ;)
 
Last edited:
Perhaps to the same level, but to meet my basic requirements, I don't think it would take as long as it has in the first cut.

There is existing knowledge and the possibility of reverse engineering.

(as someone who has tasked engineers to reverse engineer old unsupported code)

Anyone is welcome to contribute
 

Ozric

Volunteer Moderator
Fair enough. I suppose even just a threat of strike would have been a more appropriate first step.

EDIT: Or perhaps an opening plea to the community to get a display of support before escalating.

EDIT2: I apologize if this seems like rehashing...I'm doing my project management thing were we talk about how things could be done better for next time. What did we learn? that kind of stuff.

No need to apologise :p it's a good way of looking at things. What we learnt is better communication is needed. And if you want respect, then you start by informing the community of the situation and asking questions, not demanding action.
 
Ok.



See the bold part? That's ad hominem. Ad hominem means you attacked the person rather than the argument. You can try to defend that, but the facts are the facts.

I can see your view point. But, that small comment, does not reduce my argument to an attack, it just seems to include one. You can't defend against my point, you can just criticize my choice in phrasing. I guess you get one point for that.
 
I think the right result was achieved... Fdev working more closely with 3rd party Devs and websites, though I can't help but feel the approach was approaching the level of blackmail, with (presumably) many CMDRs looking to use said tools to prepare their ships for the Premonition event.

Regardless, given the rapid growth of the thread in the space of an afternoon, it's clear that the 3rd party element does in fact play a critical role in supporting us in ED... and the fact we absolutely need such tools indicates a gap.
 
Last edited:
Thank you to the those that put their time and money into developing the 3rd party tools so many of us use for this game and thanks to Frontier for the quick response to their concerns. And thanks to everyone else for the very entertaining lols on a slow work day.
 
Last edited:
By the way, the whole ed 3rd party eco system is connected. Captains log, EDDiscovery, edmc feed eddn which feed eddb, esdm etc. So they all contribute to your favourite site.
 
Happy that this got resolved quickly. Many 3rd part tools complement ED very nicely, and I use some of them on a regular basis.

It seems that FDev now have made a deeper time & resource commitment to 3rd parties, and I for one appreciate that. The method of engaging Fdev was obviously based on desperation, however I don't quite understand why it had to come to these rather extreme measures.

Communication is difficult, just ask my wife.
 
You have to appreciate that what you propose, is not at all what happened at all. A systematic scheme was undertaken to use our voices, to get them, the group included with the OP, to get the attention they wanted.

I'm betting, that if that group submitted the Post, without the extortion, they would have achieved their hands goals. But, their services being invaluable to the players, they decided to abuse our relationship, and use us to do their bidding.

I would far prefer them have a temporary outage, than have them take their ball and go home and leave whoever comes next to try to spin something up from scratch over the course of weeks or months. Saying that they resorted to "extortion" or "terrorism" by saying "you're making the work we're volunteering to do, unpaid, harder than it needs to be" is ridiculous, and akin to showing up to a soup kitchen, upending the trash cans all over the floor, and yelling at the volunteers "YOU CHOSE TO DO THIS FOR FREE YOU DON'T GET TO COMPLAIN ABOUT IT, NOW CLEAN IT UP". The fact that we've somehow filled a thread with more than a hundred pages of people incapable of realizing they're not entitled to other people's time and effort is just icing on this entire ridiculous cake.

Could the developers have gotten the same response by posting on the forums without a direct link from their sites? It's impossible to say, now. Maybe other methods would have been sufficiently efficacious, maybe they would not have been. Ultimately, though, 3rd party developers are not and should not be expected to provide free service, both in terms of hosting and development time, for everyone's benefit. If you disagree with their points and think you can write a replacement for their site without needing to involve FDev, the same information they're using is available for you to consume as well; you're welcome to write a replacement and maintain it if you think that their method of calling attention to their potential burnout is so personally offensive. Alternatively, if you think the service they provide is worthless and unnecessary, why do you even care enough to argue here? If someone's providing a useless and unnecessary extension for something, and then complains about that thing being too hard to interface with, the most effective way of getting them to go away is by ignoring them, not arguing with them. (The fact that the developers use the services in question does indicate that it is not, in fact, useless; but that's another topic entirely.)
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom