2.4 request

mephisto9466

M
Frontier please please PLEASE ad a "disable gunner" option to multi crew

also to add a working global game chat feature. it would make teaming up better, it would make the game have more life, it would allow for much more fun.

also make the capital ship's FAR more dangerous, either increase the damage they do, or make them bring with them like 10 corvettes/cutters, anacondas, vultures, imp clippers, fed assault ships and the works. make them bring a powerful entrouge. I want them capital ships to make me **** pants in fear and to make any player (yes including harry potter) think twice about engaging one of those things on their own.
 
Last edited:

Fyrd Judge

Fyrd Judge
I would also add

1) More Bookmarks.

2) Add a new statistic, a record of the number of planets CMDRS have landed on to the Explorers stats. This is what defines the true definition of an Explorer ( Everything else is called Discovery)
 
Last edited:

mephisto9466

M
Fyrd Judge said:
I would also add

1) More Bookmarks.

2) Add a new statistic, a record of the number of planets CMDRS have landed on to the Explorers stats. This is what defines the true definition of an Explorer ( Everything else is called Discovery)
Click to expand...


i know this would be a long way away, but i would greatly appreciate if they started working on a base building system.
 

Factabulous

Factabulous
You all do know that the s/w for 2.4 is finished - right? The beta is to test code already written - this is literally the worst time to ask for new features... unless you got the title wrong and are asking for them in 3.0 :)
 

MrFuddyDuddy

M
I would love to see a new internal that is a hanger that can fit a player owned Sidewinder, Eagle and Imperial Eagle. One would be a Class 5 (1 Ship) the other a Class 7 (2 Ships) if one gets destroyed you restock it like you would a fighter at the cost of whatever the insurance for the ship lost was. It would be the responsibility of the helmsman to outfit and store there smaller vessels in there larger craft, so your friends/randoms cannot store there ships aboard yours.

This new hanger would function similarly to the fighter bay and the ships when docked would be repaired, refueled, and depending on the loadout restocked.

Don't really know how they would balance it other than the module being heavy, having a fairly high power draw, either that or let us customize and engineer fighters. I'd be happy with either. I love the idea of multi-crew, but fighters have always felt like they were made of toilet paper, and unless your a crack shot with fixed weapons they don't even deal a worth while amount of damage.
 

mephisto9466

M
Factabulous said:
You all do know that the s/w for 2.4 is finished - right? The beta is to test code already written - this is literally the worst time to ask for new features... unless you got the title wrong and are asking for them in 3.0 :)
Click to expand...
do not try to derail the thread. we dont care that the sofware is finished, does not mean we cant make suggestions and it does not mean they cant make last min changes or even take the ideas here and throw it to 2.5. Allow this thread to flourish and give them ideas, comments like these hamper progress.
 

Sneake Llama

Sneake Llama
mephisto9466 said:
do not try to derail the thread. we dont care that the sofware is finished, does not mean we cant make suggestions and it does not mean they cant make last min changes or even take the ideas here and throw it to 2.5. Allow this thread to flourish and give them ideas, comments like these hamper progress.
Click to expand...

He's not wrong though. If the code for 2.4 is written, major changes like what you are asking for in 2.4 are just not possible. Not only is programming your requests hard, it would also take more testing to make sure that it would work correctly.

You might not care that the software is finished, but asking for requests in 2.4 when IT IS finished is unrealistic. "Last minute" changes of the magnitude that you are asking for can't be made "last minute". That's not how game programming works.
 
Last edited:

mephisto9466

M
Blight Born said:
He;s not wrong though. If the code for 2.4 is written, major changes like you are asking for in 2.4 are not possible.
Click to expand...
my point still stands. Comments like these hamper progress. I do not care if he is right. Continue to give frontier ideas to make their game even better and more accessible to players.
 

Sneake Llama

Sneake Llama
mephisto9466 said:
my point still stands. Comments like these hamper progress. I do not care if he is right. Continue to give frontier ideas to make their game even better and more accessible to players.
Click to expand...

The title of this thread is misleading. 2.4 requests isn't accurate. At this point its click-bait. i would suggest making a new thread with more appropriate title.
 

Mobediah Jones

Mobediah Jones
mephisto9466 said:
my point still stands. Comments like these hamper progress.
Click to expand...

It doesn't hamper progress, the progress has already been made and is in it's phase of being tested. People have been telling you asking for specific changes for 2.4 is too late, not saying your request is excrement. Really, I think everyone would rejoice in more options when it comes to multicrew, but asking for them at this point in time for 2.4 is a waste of time. Save this request to after 2.4 where it's possible for the developers to implement what you wish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom