Frontier made some choices; we all get to either live with them, or elect to reduce the impact. Morals are great, however in games they tend to exist to trigger options, not gate content. It's a pretty important distinction.
OP, I'd encourage you to seek like minded people, and explore the game, with them. This could be mobius, or it could be other player groups. This will almost certainly work out better for your chosen engagement style, as it'll clearly provide the social interaction component, and it'll also reduce the portions of the game you do not particularly enjoy.
The options Frontier have provided, are that to opt-out of player-driven combat that is not at a time or place of your choosing, is to elect an appropriate Private Group, or Solo. Again; moral dilemmas are presented in this game, on purpose. Frontier included player combat in this. This is an implicit intent. One can argue semantics, but this is intentional design.
We all have freedom to elect whichever mode works best; but open does include additional moral questions and does include circumstances which one may not have control over. This is intentional. So one can rage against the machine, which will not care, or find the solution that closest matches. That may not be preferable, or desired but that is, as it is. I don't care what modes people elect. They exist, for a reason. We are all perfectly capable of picking an appropriate option.
So do this, pick the mode that best meets your chosen goals, and continue to enjoy the game. Labouring the point over morals isn't going to change the situation. It just isn't.
Fly safe.
OP, I'd encourage you to seek like minded people, and explore the game, with them. This could be mobius, or it could be other player groups. This will almost certainly work out better for your chosen engagement style, as it'll clearly provide the social interaction component, and it'll also reduce the portions of the game you do not particularly enjoy.
The options Frontier have provided, are that to opt-out of player-driven combat that is not at a time or place of your choosing, is to elect an appropriate Private Group, or Solo. Again; moral dilemmas are presented in this game, on purpose. Frontier included player combat in this. This is an implicit intent. One can argue semantics, but this is intentional design.
We all have freedom to elect whichever mode works best; but open does include additional moral questions and does include circumstances which one may not have control over. This is intentional. So one can rage against the machine, which will not care, or find the solution that closest matches. That may not be preferable, or desired but that is, as it is. I don't care what modes people elect. They exist, for a reason. We are all perfectly capable of picking an appropriate option.
So do this, pick the mode that best meets your chosen goals, and continue to enjoy the game. Labouring the point over morals isn't going to change the situation. It just isn't.
Fly safe.
Last edited: