Player Faction Dashboard: Metrics to for Faction Activity

Way back in forums, I remember FDev promoting “triple elite” player factions in which active player factions would be rewarded. My guess is that never got started as there was no good metrics to gauge player faction activity. That changed with EDDM, EDDB, EDSM, INARA, etc. storing data from the CMDR logs. These sites have nice dashboards for each faction. However, the only metric to compare factions is to sort the number of systems controlled.
.
My idea is to see if the community can come up with some meaningful metrics for player faction activity. Using the EDDB “populated_systems” and “factions” nightly dump JSON files, I came up with these six:
1) Number of Systems Controlled
2) Number of Systems Present
3) Population Controlled – The sum of the total system population for all systems the faction controls. Looking at only the number of systems controlled gives an advantage to factions on the frontier were the population of the systems is small. This metric reflects the difficulty in operating in the population dense core
4) Population Influenced – The sum of the total system population multiplied by the faction’s influence for all system present. Again, this metric reflects how much more work it takes to build influence in high population systems.
5) Farthest Expansion from Home System – The distance from the faction’s home system to the any system present. I don’t know if this is a measure of activity; I was just curious.
6) Farthest Two Systems Present – The farthest distance between any two systems the faction is present.
.
I put the output in a spreadsheet so can search, sort or filter.
.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5yoaUOAhfUHVlhMdlJjMUlkS3M
.
I asked CMDR Obvious to analyze the output. He concluded that one group of factions are at the top of metric 1 and 2, another group dominate metric 3 and 4, and a third make up metric 5 and 6. A few groups do well in several types of metrics. Below is a quick summary from the spreadsheet.
.
Sorted by Number of Systems Controlled and Systems Present, the Independent aligned “Winged Hussars” are at the top of list. The top Alliance group is the “SAP Core Legion” in 8th place, and the top Imperial group is the “East India Company” in 16th place. The Feds just break into the top 30 with the “Blood Brothers from Alrai.”
.
“Aisling’s Angels,” “Perez Ring Brewery,” and “ARMADA Corp” are well down the list in terms of systems controlled, but lead in the set of metrics for population controlled and influenced.
.
https://i.imgur.com/oNx2MEB.png
.
Sorted by Population Controlled, the “Winged Hussars” drop to 34th place, and “Aisling’s Angels,” “Perez Ring Brewery,” “ARMADA Corp,” and “Blood Brothers from Alrai.” move into the top 5. The top faction is the “SSL Interstellar PLC,” they also scored well on number of systems controlled placing 19th on the list.
The Federal “Starship Enterprises” only controls 1 system, but it’s population is large enough to put them in 6th place.
.
https://i.imgur.com/TmXxpOJ.png
.
Sorted by Farthest expansion from the home system, “The Fuel Rats Mischief” and the “Federal Tactical Force” take the top spots even though the control few systems. “Sirius Inc” and “Cannonn,” who made the top 30 for systems controlled, move into the 3rd and 4th place. The top Alliance group is the “LHS 2541 Alliance Combine” in 5th place. The top Imperial group is “Pauline’s People’s Party” in 14th place. The factions that dominated the population controlled metrics fall well down the list.
.
https://i.imgur.com/p82h2KB.png
.
Overall the “Winged Hussars” did well in each type of metric. Ranking player factions is subjective as it assumes the goals of player groups are the same. Any ideas to broaden the metrics would be valuable.
.
Cheers
 
Last edited:
Interesting stuff, thanks OP!

Personally I would argue that the "farthest expansion from home system" and "farthest two systems" metrics are a bit muddied and need some filtering. There are systems out there designated to a particular faction by FDev for lore purposes. These haven't been expanded into by that faction. Best example of this is the Fuel Rats. They don't really work the BGS, as you can see through the small amount of systems under their control.

Traffic through systems would be a nice metric. But it's a nightmare to filter as you can't tell who is just passing through and who is making a contribution to faction activity.

Interestingly enough, not all those factions in the database could be considered "triple elite" factions. A few don't have the required amount of members to qualify. [big grin]
 
Very interesting work.

Systems controlled & present are probably the most obvious metrics for an expansionist faction - though of course do have a bias towards older factions. I doubt there's enough reliable information on founding dates to correct for that, though.

The difference between the farthest expansion (after removal of FDev-induced outliers) and population controlled probably makes sense - in fringe regions the population is smaller so expansions are easier and systems are further apart so they're likely to be more sparsely spread. Would be interesting to see a scatterplot of ranking on 3 vs ranking on 5, perhaps.

I do something similar for the Colonia region (and also include stations controlled in the sortable metrics) - https://cdb.sotl.org.uk/reports/control and https://cdb.sotl.org.uk/reports/reach - for Colonia as for Sol, Reach/Population Influenced probably is more a matter of luck, though Sol also has the more radial distribution where higher populations are more common towards the centre (which biases a bit towards Federals), and Colonia doesn't.

Traffic flow through a system is more a reflection of where the system is and whether it has any generally-interesting assets than any factional activity, but certainly an interesting metric in some ways. It's also inconvenient to collect on a mass scale since you can't get it from the Journal (yet? Frontier? Please?) and I think EDDN-sourced data only picks up on about 5% of it (and will obviously underestimate console-focused factions). Similarly for crime/bounties reports, though the information from those can be interesting on a non-factional basis as well.

I have a spectral graph of what states factions spend their time in - https://cdb.sotl.org.uk/reports/states . Relatively few in-bubble systems have the EDDN-enabled traffic flow to get a decent track of that, I suspect. No idea how you'd use it as a rankable metric, either, though submetrics like "most time in Boom" / "least time in Famine" would be possible.
 
Hi :OP and please feel free to add Sacra Oculus with 13 systems controlled and present in a total of 17 systems (soon to be 18), making 13 out of (soon to be) 18 controlled.
 
Nice work, it's cool to see my faction among the big names :D

I would argue that godmodded factions, like the Fuel Rats, shouldn't count towards the furthest expansion rank. But that's the only criticism I have. +rep
 
5th, i'll take that.

Would be nice to see those results with player created factions vs player adopted factions. Player factions started going into the BGS in the 1.4 update i think.
 
Very interesting work.


I do something similar for the Colonia region (and also include stations controlled in the sortable metrics) - https://cdb.sotl.org.uk/reports/control and https://cdb.sotl.org.uk/reports/reach - for Colonia as for Sol, Reach/Population Influenced probably is more a matter of luck, though Sol also has the more radial distribution where higher populations are more common towards the centre (which biases a bit towards Federals), and Colonia doesn't.

As usual Ian, you're way ahead of me! Your "Colonia Region System Database" makes my spreadsheet look so 1990's. I agree that tracking some metrics over time is most accurate way to gauge activity, especially for newer factions. A new faction getting their first expansion would have a 100% growth rate.
 
Oh damn, we missed our time to shine, no category for how many assets a faction has! [hehe]

Very nice effort. Interesting look into the Federation as well, as part of a group who is currently in direct conflict with a Federal group.
 
Hi :OP and please feel free to add Sacra Oculus with 13 systems controlled and present in a total of 17 systems (soon to be 18), making 13 out of (soon to be) 18 controlled.

Mrjupp - I don't know why Sacra Oculus is not on the spreadsheet. Your data is in the EDDB factions data dump.
 
Macklin, your Table has one mistake: Some rows are hidden, for example row 31 to 39.

Coincidence? Hmm... [big grin]

Just one minor oversight. Social Eleu Progressive Party were a thing long before FD introduced Player Owned Minor Factions.

I found us at row 35. ;)

Mrjupp - I don't know why Sacra Oculus is not on the spreadsheet. Your data is in the EDDB factions data dump.

Sacra Oculus is in row 52, also a hidden one.
 
Is there a way to add inara information in with this? As a cross reference?

Ive fixed it since, but the Nexus Union wasnt showing as a player faction in eddb. Thought more people looked at Inara for faction info then eddb?

Really like how this was done but what about the factions that dont have systems in-game. I can think of one 143 member group that does cool stuff and is rather active on the forum too.

Should pf's be judged solely on systems owned?
 
Is there a way to add inara information in with this? As a cross reference?

Ive fixed it since, but the Nexus Union wasnt showing as a player faction in eddb. Thought more people looked at Inara for faction info then eddb?

Really like how this was done but what about the factions that dont have systems in-game. I can think of one 143 member group that does cool stuff and is rather active on the forum too.

Should pf's be judged solely on systems owned?

Wolfe3 - if your on PC you can use a tool the Elite Dangerous Market Connector (EDMC) that updates the "mother" database called the Elite Dangerous Data Network (EDDN). EDDB and INARA download data from the EDDN so you don't have to do it by hand anymore. I'm on Xbox so not an expert on this; try the forums:
.
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/forumdisplay.php/220-Released-amp-Active-Player-Tools
.
I agree with you, a group like the "Children of Raxxal" only care about controlling one system, Raxxal (if they can ever find it). If there was a way to track light years traveled, they'd be at the top of the list.
 
Now that I see SEPP hasn't been overlooked, I'll add my thoughts on your initial question.

One of the metrics I'm currently looking at with our group, is "percentage of dockable assets owned".
Also, being an independent faction in a Federation area of space, "percentage of dockable assets owned by Federation aligned factions".

Overall security level is also a factor.

I'm sure it would be possible to generate an equation which input systems controlled, systems present, populations, influence, security, distance to furthest system, etc, and come up with a single metric for ranking.
I'm also sure most of us could come up with our own weighted equation which puts our faction at the top of the list.

EDIT:Would be interesting to hear the actual criteria that Fdev used when they decided who was going to participate in the Dangerous Games.
 
Last edited:
Wolfe3 - if your on PC you can use a tool the Elite Dangerous Market Connector (EDMC) that updates the "mother" database called the Elite Dangerous Data Network (EDDN). EDDB and INARA download data from the EDDN so you don't have to do it by hand anymore. I'm on Xbox so not an expert on this; try the forums:
.
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/forumdisplay.php/220-Released-amp-Active-Player-Tools
.
I agree with you, a group like the "Children of Raxxal" only care about controlling one system, Raxxal (if they can ever find it). If there was a way to track light years traveled, they'd be at the top of the list.

I wish i had a pc that could run elite, xbox myself.
 
By the way, the number of controlled stations in EDDB in innacurate, at least for both of our factions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom