Alien archaeology and other mysteries: Breaking News, Theories and Tinfoil Hattery

I found around 30 new barnacles but i just found it because of the glitch...

Yeah. It's a glitch... wasn't confirmed a bug before that post but nonetheless... I've stopped recording them now.

However... FD really should embrace this bug, rather than try and "fix" it. We've already got a "Guardian Ruins" scanner... how long have we known about barnacles for, and *still* don't have a scanner for them? And now that there's a way to see all POI within 1,000Ls, I'm actually out in the various nebula, scanning most planets, looking for things. It's dramatically improved the experience with this content in my opinion.

More frankly, with the debacle that was the Guardian Ruins mission, and a whole host of other things I've perceived as design failures... about time there was a "bank error" in our favour.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I'm still not getting why it's not possible for nature to have evolved similar solutions to the same problems in similar environments.

In fact, it seems to me to be absolutely compelling.

DNA, for example - Ram Tah doesn't say they have the same DNA as us, just that it has the same structure.

Blood: well you need to transport nutrients around the body somehow. Trees do it with sap, plants with a similar substance. So again: they had blood but that's more likely due to the fundamental chemistry on which their bodies are based, which is more down to the *environment* they evolved within rather than automatically making them related to us. Again, we have other organisms on Earth with different biochemistry precisely because of their environment - e.g. Sulphur & Carbon Dioxide-based life. Even then, that life has a blood analogue.

And re physiology - again, it might just be that evolution selects certain physiologies for the most intelligent species. Example - to change the environment you need tools, at least for beyond the most basic changes (e.g. beavers building dams), and if you can't manipulate objects effectively then your ability to make those changes is severely hampered. So it seems likely that the best toolmakers throughout this universe would all evolve analogues to hands and fingers which are nimble and which can manipulate objects very efficiently. Crows also use tools, but their beaks and feet are inherently limiting factors in the range of tools they can make and use. In short: they won't be making spaceships any time soon.

Similar with forward-facing eyes for seeing, or legs or similar for moving around unimpeded etc...

So for every interpretation which says 'they're similar, so we must be related' there is an alternative explanation which says that life could well have evolved similar solutions more than once. We're patterns matchers and classifiers, that's the way our brains work: so it's natural to see similarities and to say 'they're the same': but there might be a more benign explanation.

Because that's not how evolution works, at all.

As I've said. Just look at Earth. Evolution has developed millions of solutions to the same problems on our planet alone. We don't look like Spiders at all, yet we evolved from the same common ancestor. So why on Earth (lol) would you think that Aliens that developed from totally different organisms would share a vast number of characteristics with us?

In this case it's not the individual similarities that are astounding - for example we know that eyes like ours evolved independently at least two or three times on Earth (although of course they all have the same environmental factors and common ancestor), it's the assemblage of those similarities together that's significant.

The chances that a totally alien biology, a totally alien evolutionary path developed on a totally alien planet orbiting a totally different star would develop something that's so very similar to us as an end-product for intelligent life is absolutely astronomically unlikely. Why don't they have six eyes? Why have fingers at all, why not tentacles? Why do they have two legs? That's unastable, why not four, or six? Why do they have bilateral symmetry, why not 8 limbs, or three eyes? Why do they have bones at all, why not fluid-filled sacs that can be variably inflated by bladders allowing flexibility and rigidity? Why a nose in the middle of the face, why not have it on the ends of the hands, that way they could better detect if the food they're picking up is in good condition? The list goes on, and on.

We only look like us by random chance that our direct ancestors didn't die. That's literally evolution in action. To suggest that aliens would look like us because it's a good solution to intelligent life is just incorrect. Our form isn't a good solution. It's the least bad solution that worked last time.

It's only by totally random chance that Lizards don't still rule the Earth. There have been many extinction events on Earth, if any one of them hadn't happened, we wouldn't be here. Our shape and size is not at all the only solution to an intelligent creature that can manipulate it's environment. It's just the one that survived and gained the advantage here on Earth. That's how evolution works.

You're saying that a collection of (presumably) similar building blocks existed on an alien world (which is not unlikely) and over billions of years they evolved, doing the survival shuffle the whole time, and the end product of that evolution just so happened to resemble us! That's just a completely mind-blowingly incorrect interpretation of how evolution works. It's worth noting though that if the universe is infinite, then yes, there will have been humans and near-humans evolved on other planets because that's how infinity works too - just noting that here.

If you can, watch this episode of Genius, it's a brilliant example of survival of the fittest evolution in action. Unfortunately this isn't available in the UK right now, but if you can find it this is what I'm talking about. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5621876/?ref_=ttep_ep5 They do an experiment which shows how evolution works, and how massively, stunningly, mind numbingly unlikely it is that if/when we encounter aliens they'd look anything like us or even think like us.

Exobiologists don't think extraterrestrial life needs DNA at all. It's just one way that life on Earth used amino acids to encode information (and it's actually not that great, it's just the least bad solution that worked last time). So the fact that Guardians have basically the same DNA structure as us is remarkable in itself. More here: https://www.newscientist.com/articl...eins-alien-life-might-be-radically-different/

If you just do some googling for a few minutes you'll see what I'm talking about.

And, again, I'll go back to in the in-game Lore and Ran Tah saying that we're most likely related to the Guardians. Even if the entirely of Science didn't back me up, that fact alone does.
 
So you say its ok if i share this?
Im not sure because it was a glitch...
Is it acually fixed btw.?

Oh I'm no authority. If you don't feel comfortable sharing, don't. I've just got opinions about this, and it wasn't considered a "bug" when I found them.

tl;dr If you share, saying "Jmanis said it was ok!" won't help you if there's any repercussions from it.
 
some older thargoid info. :)

[h=2]THE THARGOIDS - TRUTH AND FICTION -4[/h] M.C.S
Thargoids are insectoid. They have a chitinous exo-skeleton, multi-jointed legs and opposing first and second digits (analogous to the humanoid thumbs).
Collections of Thargoid body parts were initiated during the peak of the Thargoid Wars and the morphology of those remaining are divided into two distinct types: those parts scooped from the wreckage of a Thargoid ship and those parts retrieved by explorers from other sources. The former are large, blue-green to grey in colour and suggest a body mass ranging from two to five times that of the average 2 metre humanoid.
The latter, described in detail in the Giomanst Encyclopaedia, are black, have fewer leg joints and are of a human scale. Of the two, only the Giomanst specimens have been reconstructed in full. It seems likely that there are several variants and that the two forms may well represent different stages in the life cycle of the Thargoid from neonate to full adult.
Next issue: Thargoid biology.

[h=2]THE THARGOIDS - TRUTH AND FICTION -5[/h] M.C.S
Our understanding of Thargoid biology is severely hampered by the failure to establish the location and nature of their home world or worlds. Investigations into the interiors of with relatively few mother ships captured intact reveal an ammonium-based atmosphere held at a slightly higher pressure and lower temperature than is tolerable to most humanoids. The body parts are carbon-based but contain traces of several previously un-named elements.
Metabolism is presumed to be oxidation/reduction based but an equivalent to the Krebs cycle has not been demonstrated. In terms of procreation, there exist adult females termed hive 'mother' capable of spawning a succession of 'drones' - sterile females with no reproductive potential.
Drones are produced as eggs and nursed to adulthood through a series of nymph stages similar to almost all insect species in the known worlds. All reproduction is parthenogenic and there is no evidence for the existence of a second gender.
It is believed that there exists a degree of psychological continuity between members of the same hive and this 'hive consciousness' will be explored in the next issue: Thargoid culture and politics.
 
some older thargoid info. :)

[h=2]THE THARGOIDS - TRUTH AND FICTION -4[/h] M.C.S
[h=2]THE THARGOIDS - TRUTH AND FICTION -5[/h] M.C.S

Important to note that this stuff from FFE is no longer considered canon. It may still be correct, or it may be wrong.
 
Still a nice read for most players :) And from what i understand they went with the BAD ending from that game to use in Elite dangerous , so a lot of the old buildup should be the same ..
 
Last edited:
Still a nice read for most players :) And from what i understand they went with the BAD ending from that game to use in Elite dangerous , so a lot of the old buildup should be the same ..

The bad ending may not have been so bad for the Thargoids, now that we know they had Meta-Alloys well before the 3250s.
 
Sorry that doesn't make any sense at all. Guardian artefacts have survived millions of years on these planets where the sites are found, and even now the Earth fossil record is well understood (if not, obviously, complete) way back beyond that timescale, and not a single Guardian-like artefact or whatever has been found on Earth, according to ED canon.

In fact, we have a very clear line - not least from DNA - from current modern humans all the way back to the start of life on Earth - with very clear evidence that the earlier we go back, the more 'primitive' those humans were.

The idea that we're an offshoot of a space faring race runs completely contrary to that idea.

And, more importantly, for this to be correct, then, you'd have to be saying that *all* life on Earth is related, right back hundreds of millions of years.

And that's just not possible. It's a romantic notion, nothing else.

To be very, very clear (I've mentioned this in previous posts but I'll restate it here). I do not believe (in real life) that we're descended from Aliens, I think the idea is ludicrously insane and undermines our achievements as a species and spits in the face of science. I am talking about Elite Lore and history in this game. Not reality.

Again, a you demonstrate a stunning misinterpretation of facts.

You're saying that if a single space-ship landed on Earth 1million years ago, we'd have definitely found it? And because we haven't, it can't have happened. And because we found Guardian ruins on airless planets (which means there's no erosion) we would definitely have found a Guardian artefact on Earth if there was one? And you're also saying that if a governement of Earth at any point in history found a single alien artefact that absolutely would have been pointed out strongly in ED lore, and not at all concealed by The Club or any other organisation throughout history?

You're 100% certain of these facts, because...?

How about the fact that Troy (and entire city much, much less than 1million years old) was totally lost, despite it being mentioned in many aspects of histroy, it was believed to be a myth... until it was discovered. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy#The_search_for_Troy

We loose stuff all the time - stuff we made! We're still discovering ruins of civilisation we didn't even know existed, even now. If Human life stopped right now it would only take a few thousand years to wipe away most signs of human life on Earth, and look what we've done to the planet! Give it a million or two years (the approximate time the Guardians have been extinct) and there would be virtually no traces of humanity left on the surface of the Earth (admittedly there would be in the fossil record, but we're not talking a world-spanning Guardian civilisation).

I'm also not suggesting that all life must be related to the Guardians at all.

Why couldn't a group of Guardian exiles land on earth and play genetic gods with primitive creatures they found here? It's stated in their history they were adept at genetic manipulation and created entire species just for delicacies at banquets. They could very easily have modified existing Earth species.

Maybe the Guardians came from Earth! Maybe primates were taken from Earth around 2-3million years ago by some third alien species. There's countless possibilities for links. It seems likely to me that in the narrative of Elite lore that the simpler solutions often turn out to be the case. DB himself said he doesn't like human-looking aliens, and then he puts human-looking aliens into the game. There was literally no reason to do that other than to prove they and us are related (since they are written descriptions, he could have made them slime beasts with twenty heads and five brains that live in swamps and feed off braintrees, but he didn't.)

There's an established link between Guardians, Humans and Thargoids. That's indisputable, it's literally in the game. Figuring out what those links are should be what we're doing. I've stated that I think Guardians and Humans are related closely (probably descendants in some fashion) and that the Thargoids are most likely Guardian AI evolved.

Your job should be coming up with a different theory if you think I'm incorrect, not trying to disprove my theory with your shaky grasp of science. Your signature has the Canonn group logo, if you're truly a researcher, stop trying to shoot me down and come up with a better theory and prove that as well as I've proven mine. I'm willing to be wrong, I've just yet to see an argument that's correct levied against my theory.
 
The bad ending may not have been so bad for the Thargoids, now that we know they had Meta-Alloys well before the 3250s.
No we don't. That's an incorrect interpretation of the Equinox logs and Palin's data.

The Equinox logs mention access to a self repairing material. Meta-alloys don't, and in fact can't self repair. It was the self repair mechanism of the probes and sensors that was causing the damage to stations. Building things out of the Meta-alloys prevented ​​the self repair as per Palin's discovery.
 
Well I have come up with a different theory that's equally plausible - and I did it without insulting your 'shaky grasp of science'.

Neither theory is proven, which makes them equally valid in my book. I just disagree with yours.
 
Were they any Com Logs there!?!!

All there was, was some materials and a data point with typical data scan stuff. four of them though. I did a short search in the area after reading of the other storyline 'conda in Alshat. It was time for me to get some sleep by then.

I suspect it was the FDEVs using what they constructed to flesh out the area. It was interesting following the sub-storyline. Check the listening posts when you see them!
 
No we don't. That's an incorrect interpretation of the Equinox logs and Palin's data.

The Equinox logs mention access to a self repairing material. Meta-alloys don't, and in fact can't self repair. It was the self repair mechanism of the probes and sensors that was causing the damage to stations. Building things out of the Meta-alloys prevented ​​the self repair as per Palin's discovery.

That doesn't matter as long as the already had self repairing materials.

The Mycoid would not worry them to much.
 
In response to someone's previous argument, I don't think the fact that humans and guardians are/were both symetrical and bipedal is evidence for common source. Most species are symmetrical, bipedality makes for efficient movement while giving a raised eyeline for evolutionary advantageous sensing of danger or prey. I suspect parallel evolution applied, with some common evolutionary selection parameters.

Parallel Evolution works on Earth simply because we're all evolved from the same basic roots and addressing the same evolutionary challenges of our planet. The chances of an alien developing almost identically to us is astronomical. If you read up a bit I expanded on this in a previous post, but basically you're assuming that because it's true in certain specific cases on Earth it must therefore hold true for all examples of everything anywhere.

Many species on Earth are evolved from a five lobed common ancestor, yet the species divergence from that ranges from animals with two legs to animals with no legs to animals with four legs from animals only a few centimetres tall to animals weighing tonnes, some have tails and some don't. Plus a massive variation in-between and variations on all other structures - across billions of years of evolution. Just because some animals resemble others doesn't mean that Aliens are likely to look like humans just because they evolve in an oxygen-nitrogen atmosphere under similar conditions to Earth (and at what point in Earth's history? are you suggesting that an Alien planet suffered the exact same environmental and ecological changes over billions of years, including meteorite strikes and solar occurrences?). Even if (somehow) a planet went through similar things, any evolved creatures are just as likely to look like Monitor Lizards or Squid or Kangaroos.

The reason I think my theory is correct is because of the extremely unlikely convergence of many different elements.

The similarity of physical appearance. Similarity of DNA. Similarity of Biological requirements. Similarity of preferred environmental conditions. Similarity of cultural elements. Similarity of technological understanding. Similarity of location in the Galaxy. etc.

Any one of these things alone is totally coincidental, totally agree, but put them all together than it becomes much harder to dispute as a whole theory, because you have to come up with alternates for each coincidence.

I would never suggest that Thargoids and Humans share a biological linnk because there's so many things that diverge. The only reason I think we're linked is because of the proven link between Thargoids and Guardians and, as I've mentioned, some cultural similarities (like using red as a warning colour, makes no sense for Thargoids unless they adopted it culturally from the Guardians).

Well I have come up with a different theory that's equally plausible - and I did it without insulting your 'shaky grasp of science'.

Neither theory is proven, which makes them equally valid in my book. I just disagree with yours.

That's because I don't have a shaky grasp of science :p

What was your theory? I've looked back a bit but I can't see any, I'd be interested in hearing it.
 
Panspermia would not create two almost physically, socially and mentally identical creatures. That's just not how evolution works.

Sure that might mean there's a DNA link, but if that were the case the Guardians would be just as likely to be Jellyfish or Lizards.

The fact they are basically humans but with some differences implies a much more recent common ancestor, but since there's significant skeletal differences then it seems likely they might have genetically altered themselves into, presumably, early primates. Or maybe spliced their DNA with our ancestors which could (in game) account for the relatively sudden appearance and dominance of early modern humans and the eventual downfall of Neanderthals.
quite wrong though - given comparable physical preconditions (e.g. gravity range, geology, chemical mix etc.) a paralell evolution to same basic structure is predictable.
The laws of physics are universal (hopefully :) ), same applies for the rules of thermodynamics. Hence the result of the the evolutionary process will result in similar concepts - even if one species is based on Ammonia and the other on Oxygen/Carbon - both will develope under same conditions in that way that energy-ratio is optimized....
 
I've been involved in too many arguments in the past related to this stuff, so I'll avoid it for now :D (besides, I cited ancient astronaut theory in my guardian thread)

The trouble is, it is pretty hard to believe in aliens...

Unless (what happened to me) you've watched a Hercules plane chasing a black triangle ufo (three times the size of the plane) over Devizes in Wiltshire... then you sort of... can't dispute aliens :D not that anyone would believe it unless they saw it themselves. I would love to meet the RAF crew.
 
Ok, lot's of things to respond to in here so I'll try and field it all point by point.


Your first point: I don't think it's that the entirety of a mature and civilisation-spanning AI left and set up shop cranking out upgrades like the Matrix. I imagine the war was brutal, we know it ended the Guardian civilisation entirely, so it must have been epic. I imagine that a few surviving AI units escaped and slowly altered themselves over time, maybe they made lots of mistakes and were working with limited resources. It could even have been the equivalent of a few machines lying in a wrecked ship in a crater on some crappy ammonia based world after crashing there. Maybe it took them a million years to figure out how to walk, we don't really know how an AI (especially an Alien one, damaged by war) might evolve.
All fair points, but equally this would rely on them never going back to the Guardian sites and accessing the Guardian files despite 2 million years in which to do so. (And if they became the Thargoids, then most certainly having the tech to do so.) It also requires that they ignored or completely forgot that the Guardians were biowarfare experts, and built themselves bodies and tech that were vulnerable to it.

It may not have been the Guardian AI that evolved into the Thargoids, but there still must be some significant link in the past between Thargoids and the Guardians that goes so far as to make the Thargoids react very violently to their technology in a way they just never have to us. If it was something like "we used Guardian stuff in the past", then why don't the Thargoids react as violently to us?
It’s a good point. However, there’s viable explanations, for example we may have concealed that the mycoid attack was by us.

As far as we know the Relics are inert things, maybe they are ancient weapons batteries (them rising up from the ground might suggest that), but that implies the Thargoids recognise that tech for what it is, recognise it, not us using them, and not us as the beings that wield them, but the technology itself.

IIRC from their descriptions, the Relics are power sources. They also definitely have something inside them. Plus Guardian writing on them. Perhaps they react just to the emissions from the Relics. Perhaps they can scan what’s inside the Relic and react to that. Perhaps they can read what it says on the Relic and it says “Danger, toxic” or something like that. Plenty of possible interpretations.

My theory, that there's a racial link between Thargoids and Guardians, makes sense of the almost instinctual reaction they show. It's like the reaction a Cat has to anything vaguely snake-shaped, it's hard-coded in ancient DNA because the two were ancient enemies.
Err… cats and snakes were ancient enemies? Think you might need to give some back up on this one. If it’s anything to do with those videos that were doing round, it was never proven that the cats reactions were because they thought the objects were snakes.

And, we only know of one enemy the Guardians had - the AI/Linked Guardians.
This isn’t correct.

Within Guardians you have:

Group A – Implanted Guardians. Exiled in the first civil war by the abolitionists/religious faction. Prior to exile these Guardians had helped the AI achieved sentience and hosted them via the implants. No records exist as to what happened to them post-exile.

Group B – Non-implanted Guardians. Guardian history after the first civil war pertains to this group. There are two sub-groups within there:

B1 – The abolitionist/religious faction. Based on the homeworld. Tried to prevent the AIs from achieving existence independent from the monolith network. Turned to violence to do so, resulting in the second civil war against:

B2 – The Guardians who supported the AIs. Largely based on the colonies.

It’s not known which faction won the civil war so it could have been the anti-AI faction or the pro-AI faction. Regardless, the winners were already dying.

However, there’s also the Foe/Adversary. This throws into doubt the details of the outcome and latter points of the civil war, and the subsequent death of all of group B, and suggests that another party was responsible for wiping out group B.

Back to the Thargoids;

If the Thargoids are Guardian descendants of any kind (AI, Exile, Hybrid) then why would they have a blanket bad reaction to Guardian tech? Only group B1 would have been antagonistic to them. In the case of the AI, group B2 fought and died in support of the AI, so why would the AI bear a grudge against Guardians as a whole?

Your second point about the Guardian link with Humanity: Since DB and the team are scientifically oriented (while not strictly adhering to scientific fact) I don't believe they would "accidentally" create a species of aliens that look almost exactly like humans breathing almost exactly human air that aren't related to us.
Why? DB and co seem perfectly capable to me of envisioning similar beings evolving in similar environments and building that into the game. The 2 extra joints in the arms of the Guardians distinctly marks them out humans and vertebrate life on Earth.

Statistically that's incredibly unlikely to occur based on everything we know about evolution.
Disagreed here. It’s about aptness to the environs. If certain forms have emerged from certain environs on Earth, then why would similar forms not prove apt in similar environs on other planets? Besides, the sample size we have is 1, so we’re not in any position to make authoritative assessments of the statistical likelihood.

Convergent Evolution accounts for small structures like eyes or certain organ features, but even then they evolved from the same basic ancestor on the same planet so it makes sense that ultimately evolution would sometimes come up with very similar things given the same deck of cards to shuffle, but why would evolution create bipedal, bilaterally symmetrical animals on a totally different planet unless they were related somehow?
It may be that DNA and RNA are the only viable basis for life. If that’s the case then it would be the same deck of cards wherever life arose, to use your analogy. Whether there are other viable bases for life isn’t known, but we do know that DNA and RNA are a viable basis. If DNA and RNA appeared on Earth then the possibility of them appearing is proven, and they could appear elsewhere. Again, that’s then the same deck of cards.

Regardless of the basis of life, what evolves will be subject to principles of energy efficiency.

So, for example, looking at senses, being able to pinpoint things in 3D space provides a substantial advantage. What’s one of the simplest way of 3D sensing? - with two sensors equidistant from a centrepoint. & there you go – bilateral symmetry of several organs. It maximises the ratio of energy reward to energy cost.

Bipdealism has evolved completely separately in different animals on Earth. Equally it could evolve elsewhere.

There's no reason that the ancestors of Guardians were 5 lobed organisms, they might have had six, or twenty, or three. Any minor variation back at the dawn of time would create wildly different end products, and sure they might have eyes similar to us, or maybe they have calcium-based bones because that's a handy thing to use, but it's far, far, far more likely that they'd be literally anything else.
What basis do you have for that? They evolved on a planet similar to ours, and so the selection pressures are likely to have been similar. And again those selection pressures may well result in the same forms being favourable as they have on Earth.

We know on Earth that evolution has come up with millions of different answers to the same basic needs (food, protection, mating, etc.). Some species have wings, some are small, some big, some have tiny brains, some big, some are covered in armour, some fur, some scales, some warn blooded, some cold, some are mushrooms...
It’s millions of variations on basic themes though.

Take food.

Almost every animal is basically a tube. Food goes in one end and waste comes out the other.

Yes there’s incredible diversity but it’s all wrapped around that basic form.

Once multicellular life occurs, there’s only so many possible basic forms for food processing. Selection pressures have resulted in that particular form being one of the predominant forms on Earth, so what is there to suggest that the same wouldn’t occur on other similar worlds?

Again, energy efficiency considerations will eventually lead to bilateralism of sensory organs.

Variations on the forms will occur, and those variations which are more apt for the environs will proliferate, and that will continue for billions of years.

Again, if the environs are similar then similar selection pressures will be there, and over the huge amounts of time involved there is nothing to indicate that those pressures would not drive things towards the same forms as they have on Earth.

Convergent Evolution wouldn't create a species that looks almost exactly like humans, or rather, it's so statistic incredibly unlikely that it's certainly not going to happen in almost the exact same region of space!
Well, arguably they don’t actually look that much like humans – from the descriptions you wouldn’t look at them and think they were human relatives. You would recognise them as being very different. One of those stereotypical ‘greys’ looks more human than the description of the Guardians.

Or have you been looking at Dreamstate’s boobtastic drawings?! 😉

But again, see all my previous points about convergent evolution.

If there are other Human-forms out there it's more likely they are on the other side of the universe or something.
Why wouldn’t it happen in the same area of space? Selection pressures which are related to positioning in the galaxy are going to be more or less the same in the same area of space, so that would increase the chance of the convergent evolution, not decrease it.

What you're suggesting is that because a pack of playing cards dropped by Bob the Gambler landed with more Clubs facing up than any other suit, if you drop 52 bananas from an albatross they'd land with more Clubs facing up too. It just doesn't make sense.
That indeed doesn’t make sense. However, it also bears no resemblance to what I was saying….

There's so many factors that guide biology over an evolutionary process. The chances of two bipedal bilaterally organised oxygen-nitrogen breathing creatures naturally evolving in total isolation in almost exactly the same area of the galaxy is literally astronomical - Especially since the entire rest of the Galaxy (as far as we know) is totally uninhabited by sentient space-faring races, yet is equally littered with Earth-like worlds.
See my previous points.

The more similar the selection pressures, the greater the probability of similar things evolving. (I’m hoping this is so self-evident that it’s not a cause for dispute.)

So the place where something like us is most likely to evolve is somewhere that’s very similar to where we evolved.

So a similar ELW in a similar part of the galaxy is more likely to be where something like us would evolve, not less likely.

There's many ways the Guardians could be our progenitors that could intersect with what we know of our own evolutionary history. There's got to be literally thousands of Sci-Fi books that deal with similar topics, some better than others!
Any of them that are more on the Sci side than the Fi? 😉

Sure, none of them happened in real life, but it's stunningly unlikely we'll encounter sentient insectiod aliens that talk in morse code too, so there's some narrative lattitude given to Elite Dangerous game genetics.
Yeah, insects that natively talked in English, which is what morse code is, is utterly crazy. No one’s suggesting that though are they?

They UAs/Thargoid Sensors use morse, yeah, but the suggestions just that they’ve learnt it and are using it for some reason. That suggestion’s not at all ridiculous. I’ve mentioned it elsewhere, but morse would probably be easier for insectoids to interpret than spoken English.

Insects don’t have lungs so don’t create sounds in the same way humans do. Their main ways of producing sound are rubbing or clashing body parts together.

It’s considered myths and legends, but The Dark Wheel describes how Orserians speak – by clashing their chelicrae together.

Communication of that form would have much more in common with morse than with either spoken or written English.

So insectoids using one of the forms of human communication that would be most intelligible to them isn’t particularly unlikely. It’s far far more likely than them using normal English.

That brings me to point 3: There MUST be a connection between the Guardians, Thargoids and Humans that goes back to our 'birth' as a species. It's simply that we can understand each other.
To say that there 'MUST' be a connection seems rather a huge leap. We share an origin with lots of species that we don’t understand. (I’m taking that by ‘understand’ you mean ‘understand what each other are saying’ as opposed to ‘understand how each other think, each others emotions, what drivers and motivators there are, etc.’). Conversely, managing to communicate with another sentient species doesn’t seem an incredible stretch.

Ram Tah fairly easily translated the Guardian data without any frame of reference.
He had huge amounts of data gathered from the first CG though.

Worth bearing in mind here that player efforts to work out the Guardian language haven’t got anywhere.

We can understand the basic principles of the layout of the ruins,
What are they? Haven’t seen any confirmed explanations.

they seem familiar (the layout is not dissimilar from things we build),
Like what?

the scale of the obelisks is basically human-engineering-sized, the overall scale of the Ruins is human-like. Etc. etc.

So? A world fairly similar to ours but with lower gravity produces beings not too dissimilar to us, but taller and thinner due to the lower gravity. They’re going to build stuff on their scale. That scale isn’t going to be much different to ours.

Same with the Thargoid stuff, it's all things we can understand. They use visible light to communicate in very similar ways to us (red is bad, etc.) They make sounds we can hear and interpret with our ears. The scale of the ground facilities indicate they're much bigger than us but not impossibly so. They use morse code, which means they must have learned it from us I guess? They behave in ways we can understand (for the most part) They use doors with keys, they use logic in similar ways to us, they view things similarly to us (the hologram in the central base chamber, etc.

Ok then, if they’re understandable:

- What’s the meaning of the hologram in the base?
- Why did they set the UAs to use morse?
- Why did the previously hyperdict, scan then leave?
- Why has that behaviour changed?
- What do they want?
- How do they think?
- Why haven’t we been able to establish any meaningful communication with their ships?
- And so on…

The very fact that both the Aliens we encountered are: a) Understandable, b) share structural, societal and cultural similarities to us, c) occupy the same area of an otherwise empty Galaxy means there must be a connection.
a. Describing them as understandable is pretty dubious for reasons given above.

b. What are these structural, societal and cultural similarities to us? The Thargoids so far appear very different. The Guardians appear reasonably different.

c. Saying the Galaxy is otherwise empty is jumping to a very very large conclusion. There’s a lot of permit locked areas out there. We also don’t know where the Thargoids are from. We’re also only guessing that the Guardians are from the main one of their bubbles. Melville and Ram Tah are contradictory about the Guardian homeworld. Also as explained above, similar species evolving in the same region of the galaxy isn’t that unlikely.

And yeah, there must be a connection in the sense that there is a mutual connection in the area of space that we occupy/occupied. But there is no logical ‘must’ in terms of the species being ancestors/descendants of each other. Logically, given the overwhelming evidence for our evolution on Earth, it would require even more overwhelming evidence to conclude that we must be somehow related to the other species.

Oh yeah, and it didn’t really come up at any point in the main reply, but there’s also the genocide of the sentient species on Achenar by the Imperials. That was in a main area of human space but is still quite hushed up. It could have happened in other places too.
 
furthermore the Bio6 data only mention "...possibly a common ancestor....", they do not specify how far back in evolutionary history/developement.
The theory of space-faring bacteria (as hideaways in/on meteorites), and by this live-spreading in our galaxy, has been developed some 1300 years ago already !

Given that they share similar blood which is distributed in the same manner would mean that they would have to evolved from a vertibrate ancestor as this sort of thing is unlikely to be generated via convergent evolution as there are just too many ways to get the same result of transfering food and oxygen to the tissues efficiently.

Now, to be space faring requires a high level of biological sophistication, meaning that a highly evolved vertibrate would have to have existed. So, the divergence would have had to have been sometime after the beginning of the Jurassic. Or, the primitive ancestors could have been taken from where-ever they evolved and distributed by a previous space faring species, possibly as a food source. Given their overall body plan, it would suggest that if this happened it would have been after the development of tetrapod vertibrates in the Carboniferous.
 
Panspermia would not create two almost physically, socially and mentally identical creatures. That's just not how evolution works.

Sure that might mean there's a DNA link, but if that were the case the Guardians would be just as likely to be Jellyfish or Lizards.

The fact they are basically humans but with some differences implies a much more recent common ancestor, but since there's significant skeletal differences then it seems likely they might have genetically altered themselves into, presumably, early primates. Or maybe spliced their DNA with our ancestors which could (in game) account for the relatively sudden appearance and dominance of early modern humans and the eventual downfall of Neanderthals.

This is not necessary, humans follow the basic terapod body plan. It's just that our tail is somewhat small and fused. It's just as easy for a lizard to evolve into an ape-like animal as it is for a mammal, given the evolutionary pressures at the right times. Having said that, being active and with a large brain would require a "warm-blooded" biology, but this has evolved at least twice on Earth, mammals and birds/dinosaurs.
 
Back
Top Bottom