Over the years there's been much discussion as to why the supposedly new ships we buy are scuffed up inside and have dirty screens.
OK so the actual answer is probably just a gamey one i.e. "realism" and FD haven't implemented a "weathering over time effect", where we might buy a pristine ship that gradually weathers.
However it got me thinking: is it realistic to expect civilians (however wealthy) to be buying totally new ships? Are we really getting reconditioned & recertified airframes i.e. "as new" but not new?
Decommissioned hand-me-downs from Navies and big corporations if you like.
Should the cost of a brand new Cutter (for example) be significantly more than the mere 170,000,000 it is now?
What happens in the real world, are all those private jets bought new?
------------------
OK so the actual answer is probably just a gamey one i.e. "realism" and FD haven't implemented a "weathering over time effect", where we might buy a pristine ship that gradually weathers.
However it got me thinking: is it realistic to expect civilians (however wealthy) to be buying totally new ships? Are we really getting reconditioned & recertified airframes i.e. "as new" but not new?
Decommissioned hand-me-downs from Navies and big corporations if you like.
Should the cost of a brand new Cutter (for example) be significantly more than the mere 170,000,000 it is now?
What happens in the real world, are all those private jets bought new?
------------------
A lot of ED ships are reconditioned, and are designs hundreds of years old that in some cases are no longer in production.
<snip>
Sidewinder 2982 - 319 years old
Cobra 3100 - 201 years old
Viper 2762 - 539 years old!
Python 2700 - 601 years old
Anaconda 2856 - 445 years old
Last edited: