So this is the old argument of: Everyone with a different opinion is a griever/carebear/casual/noob/whatever (strike through what is not relevant)?
I haven't seen anyone yet who wants to remove solo play. So if you are afraid of other players you could always just stick to that, no one cares. But making multiplayer into a solo player environment seems kinda counter-productive to me. Why would there need to be two of those, and no real multiplayer?
But apparantly everyone who doesn't want to limit pvp to special arenas, has a different opinion than you have, so there are grievers? Well guess I am a griever now. If you can't see why being able to shoot player haulers (for example) has significant advantages, then thats fine, but maybe you shouldn't call everyone who does a griever without allowing the option that maybe they do want to have that in the game while they aren't grievers...
Um did you actually read my post? and if you did, did you understand it? Did I say the PVP should be limited to arena's? no! did I say if anyone disagrees they are carebears? no! do I have a problem with other peoples opinions? no!
I have just stated that the game will be what the game will be. It is not ever going to be a big PVP space WOW experience! I am not saying that from any form of anti PVP opinion, but because space is huge! the ED environment is going to be huge.
I am looking forward to meeting live players in the open world, I really am. and if you want to try and shoot me, feel free I will fight back. Want to co-op fine maybe I will give that a go. I am not shrinking away from live players in game, I encourage it. More the merrier. However in a game of 400 billion systems most likely with 5 or six points on interest at least in each system to explore and assuming that there won't be more than 1 million players ever playing elite and even if they do, all being on at the same time is unlikely. Surely you can cope with some simple maths and realize the open play in ED will never be a massive PVP fest like WOW, sorry but it won't! Just to add to that, it is also David Brabens intention that it isn't like that. end of discussion on that point, what DB want he get's, it's his ball and he can play whatever game he want with it.
I was merely also offering a possible "solution" or "suggestion" that ED may implement to give those that want a more "live" environment wnat they want by suggesting a fourth mode. I thought I was being quite generous to all sides of the argument (apart from the griefers) but obviously that fell on deaf ears.
Nobody is dissing the current live online mode, I think the majority of players will be playing the full online mode, so if you are worried they won't be, then don't be, just don't expect it to be FULL of live players coz it won't be. (it's just too big)
and those that are worried about the full online mode being full of idiots, for the same reason it won't be, and if there are, block them and you never have to care again, and if it gets horrible with hackers there is always solo play.
SO everyone should be happy!
I feel like I am talking to my 4 year old, We shouldn't have to keep explaining this!