Thanks to you who have offered to help the Privateers Alliance if they are UA bombed. That is both kind and good of you.
Still, let me make clear that I in no way represent the Privateers. I’m not a member and I haven’t had discussions with them. Rather my comments are focused on the malicious actions of a few griefers who use UA bombing and what might be done about it.
Those of you who point out that UA bombing is an intended mechanic and it can be countered through deliveries are correct. Please note, however, that I’m not claiming otherwise *and* that part of this discussion is not my point.
Rather I’m highlighting how UA bombing is an unintended safe space for griefers, and the community as a whole should want to stop that for the same reasons folks have called out seal-clubbing. This is especially obvious in the case of special events, like the Enigma Expedition or a charity fund raiser.
For that to happen, creative ideas about how to defend proactively instead of simply respond reactively are needed. I’ve suggested one. Imgram suggest pre-delivery of meta-alloys which is good, but doesn't help small players. Appeals can be made, but not all are heard. So too, as BigJay indirectly suggests, we need better mechanics of interdicting stations that are less likely to be abused by griefers.
I am particularly intrigued by how we might blockade stations without keeping or creating a safe space for griefers.