The genuinely skilled PvPers are all at the PvP hub.
And if a genuinely skilled PvPer disagrees, get to the Hub to prove it![]()
Agreed, I am already on the discord hub - learning
The genuinely skilled PvPers are all at the PvP hub.
And if a genuinely skilled PvPer disagrees, get to the Hub to prove it![]()
If these people were as good as they claim to be, then surely CQC, would be full of PvP players spitting testosterone at each other, because they have all 'got gud' ... instead they prefer seal clubbing[big grin][big grin]
No one plays cqc because it's a giant mess. I tried damn hard to like it, but match making issues killed it for me. Hours spent not being able to find any game type other than deathmatch, and being matched against the same high rank players each time turned me off. Not only that, arena style combat is exceptionally boring imo, open world PvP has a lot of variables going for it that just cannot be replicated in a duelist setting.
So you don't like it because the people there kills you, while in open you can kill others. Fair enough, cough
For the record, people plays CQC, even I do, level 12, and I saw people from level 1 to level 50.
Haha, you are narrow minded to say the least. I fly a shieldless Diamondback Scout in open, so I would hardly subscribe to the "seal clubber" crowd as you would describe it. It doesn't have an interdictor either, as I prefer to +1 on the side of silly gooses such as yourself who get into trouble in open... Assuming you don't get vapourised before I can drop in on your wake and try to save you. You are most welcome.
Oh Look,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xozaOPABDNQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xozaOPABDNQ
that is me gooses narrow minded almost 2 years ago. Come and show me again.
I didn't say griefer, that comes from your own mouth, I said you don't play because you can't stand losing. You ego answered before you.
See? I didn't mind losing, I didn't mind the shame of publishing, neither do I now.
Uhuh, you are splitting hairs now. You heavily implied my preference of getting easy kills.
No one plays cqc because it's a giant mess.
I tried damn hard to like it, but match making issues killed it for me. Hours spent not being able to find any game type other than deathmatch,
and being matched against the same high rank players each time turned me off.
Not only that, arena style combat is exceptionally boring imo,
open world PvP has a lot of variables going for it that just cannot be replicated in a duelist setting.
CQC is just not fun.
I rarely tell anyone to 'get good', but it would be really nice if some of them would stop going out of their way to do the most asinine crap possible and then blame the game when they find out the hard way that stupid doesn't always work.
I honestly enjoy CQC capture the flag.
Unfortunately, the last time I was able to get into a capture the flag match was during the original CQC beta back in 1.4.
Ok, I'll try again, hope I get it right this time.
Not correct. People plays cqc, and some people find things unfair others just enjoy as it is. It is not a mess.
I have nothing to say here, you are right about mostly DM games, and match making is really bad (specially since it is a ping based matchmaking). About you don't liking it that is ok for me.
If you were matched against the people available then what is wrong with that. I have no idea, I'm not an expert, I get matched against level 50 and still make some frags here and there. I'm not wining any match.. so what? it is still fun (for me).
excuse me? 10 minutes of SCB spawning and jousting to see how the massive shields wear down then just before the 'enemy shields down' high wake is very interesting..
So it is about the ship, not the pilot then.. but if it is about the ship, why being matched against high ranked pilots was so turning down for you?
I expect adults to be able to string a sentence together. Plus since 'Git Gud' clearly has derogative connotations .... hang on ...I kind of expect well adjusted adults to be able to shrug off a little snark, anyway.
I expect adults to be able to string a sentence together. Plus since 'Git Gud' clearly has derogative connotations .... hang on ...
Dear Diary,
today I used the words "derogative connotations" in a sentence. And it's only just Monday. Should be some week.
Love,
Ziggy
and is more often used as dismissal instead of a suggestion to increase one's skills. "You should just Git Gud" is a sentiment that voices no constructive criticism. People who do offer constructive criticism usually don't resort to lazy 2 3 letter word dismissals.
Anyway, to me it signifies I am dealing with a person who has the wits of a caveman and displays the need to "get better" at communicating.
You're obviously too dimwitted to understand the point I'm making.I'm the type of person that rarely insults people that are not my friends.
If someone hits me with a derogative comment, I take it a sign of affection and care.![]()
“Git Gud”, an intentional misspelling of the phrase “get good,” is an expression used to heckle inexperienced players or newbies in online video games
Git Gud
1. A intentionally misspelled phrase meaning "get good." Generally used to pock fun at and mock inexperienced players in a particular video game.
There is a bit of a difference between:
"Git gud!"
and...
"So, sorry about killing you, but you did make a number of fundamental errors. Would you like to hear some tips on how to improve?"
But, but, but....the OP is a PSA! Surely that overrides all generally accepted meanings of a word, and sets a new standard to be followed. Right? Right!? [where is it]So using the phrase will invoke the generally accepted meaning, rather than the evasive bollox in the OP.