Nothing about tongue-in-cheek, just for different reasons i cant agree with most people here

I joined this discussion on moment
Well okay. I've been involved in this game since mid-2014.
, when someone, cant remember already, told people to go play another game, because Elite is not about PvP and that PvP was added by some accident.
I don't think anyone has said PvP was added by
accident here. Ever.
They might have said PvP is
possible - which is perfectly true.
This statement i find completely false. I am playing since beta on PC, actively since middle of 2015 i think, now switched to console and my main "way" was PvP and ganking. Constant circle of dying, killing, rebuys. And now i read that Elite is not about PvP. Wow! )
It is not accurate to claim that PvP is the main reason for the game to exist, nor the main game mechanic to which all others are subordinate.
On the contrary - PvP is completely subordinate to the main game mechanics.
The BGS, the systems of Law in non-Anarchy inhabited star systems, the material gathering, Engineering, missions, etc. all are the back-bone of the game.
Now,
your own personal reasons for playing this game may be as you stated - you're in here for PvP and ganking - your own words. That's perfectly fine (although I consider
ganking as a sole reason for playing this game to be going against the spirit of the game, and rather toxic to the game) and you have a certain level of freedom to do that, for reasons I stated a few posts ago. (Frontier actually wants some degree of player destruction in a cynical but realistic business way to keep the fires of interest burning for the game.)
However,
your reasons for playing the game aren't THE reasons the game exists. If that were so, Frontier would NOT be going to all the trouble of producing a BGS, missions etc. etc. No, instead, if
your reasons for playing the game were the sole superior reasons for the game existing, then Elite: Dangerous would be nothing more than a 3D Arcade shoot-em-up with an Elite-style skin. And that is very clearly not the case.
Regards