PvP Why PvP is not popular in Elite Dangerous?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Well, I've read a number of complaints about it, and not a single one yet from a PvPers, so...

"No I can't" is a lot quicker to type.

Its simple english man. A miss quote is a miss quote and Majority and Vast Majority are two seperate things.

Its hillarious you cant grasp the concept.

Honestly.

Where you from out of curiosity? Is english your first language? Genuine question - not trying to be an .

*It's

*English

*misquote

*separate

Let's not try and dismiss someone's point on the basis of their ability to get English right if you can't get it right.

You're still ignoring the survey that shows it's a vast minority, you've still failed to provide evidence for what you claimed I said.
 
"No I can't" is a lot quicker to type.



*It's

*English

*misquote

*separate

Let's not try and dismiss someone's point on the basis of their ability to get English right if you can't get it right.

You're still ignoring the survey that shows it's a vast minority, you've still failed to provide evidence for what you claimed I said.

Nice try but we are not arguing the spelling of a word..as this is not the playground...rather the meaning of the word...which is a much more grown up topic.

Also in my defence i actually am pretty damn tired...this is going on ...as you can see :rolleyes:
 
I think it's fair to say FDev want to discourage certain activities (sealclubbing) without punishing other outwardly similar behaviour in other situations. It would be understandable if 'normal' PvP behaviour suffered because of rules put in to discourage poor behaviour. Frustrating, but understandable.

Yep, I guess it would be acceptable and understandable to you, kind of a "can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs!" kind of thing, amiright? The fact that you find that acceptable doesn't surprise me at all:)
 
In your opinion: is it ok to assume the majority is vast when the SOURCE (Frontiers Words) do not imply it is?
Lets keep this REAL simple.

Frontier's quote doesn't imply either way, so your assumption that is isn't 'vast' simply because said descriptor wasn't used is equally as stupid as the assumption that it is vast, small or anywhere in between.

Frontier didn't narrow down on which end of the spectrum that majority lies on in any way, they simply said 'majority'.
 
Last edited:
Frontier's quote doesn't imply either way, so your assumption that is isn't 'vast' simply because said descriptor wasn't used is equally as stupid as the assumption that it is vast, small or anywhere in between.

It implys its a majority.
What it DOESNT imply is that its a VAST majority.

HOLY HELL

And you never answered my question.
 
Talk about twisting!!!!!
That would be off topic.

chubby-checker-9542332-1-402.jpg
 
Yep, I guess it would be acceptable and understandable to you, kind of a "can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs!" kind of thing, amiright? The fact that you find that acceptable doesn't surprise me at all:)

I can't think of an analogy that would affect me personally, but it's vaguely analogous to the recent mission nerfs. All suffer because some are exploitable.

I'm not against PvP, I'm very much in favour of it but I'm not a fan of it being forced on anyone that doesn't want to. I'm (usually) quite happy to offer myself up as bait by playing in Open, but I don't look for trouble.
 
Sorry, gonna have to stop you there.
You never addressed the issue of miss quoting.

It gets easier to point out the issues with your views the less words you use. I assume thats why you used so many the first time.

Anyway, back on topic....

Actually I did - and in a manner that was trying to move this thread away from this misquote fetishism. Here is part of my first post (#1969) in response to this derailment:

"So, 'vast' may well have been 'incorrectly sorced/referenced' within the context of the quote provided, but accurate none the less.

Now how about moving on."
 
Actually I did - and in a manner that was trying to move this thread away from this misquote fetishism. Here is part of my first post (#1969) in response to this derailment:

"So, 'vast' may well have been 'incorrectly sorced/referenced' within the context of the quote provided, but accurate none the less.

Now how about moving on."

Sorry but how is me pointing out its a misquote and you saying well it may be a misquote but he may be right..the same arguement?

And you never answered why it's okay for you to assume it isn't vast and not for somebody to assume it is. Majority, in essence just means more, it doesn't define much more, a little bit more or anything beyond that.

Im NOT assuming anything. Im reading the FACTS in front of me. THIS guy is the one assuming.

Are you SURE youre OK???

Any chance you'l answer the question, No?
 
Last edited:
Sorry but how is me pointing out its a misquote and you saying well it may be a misquote but he may be right..the same arguement?



Im NOT assuming anything. Im reading the FACTS in front of me. THIS guy is the one assuming.

Are you SURE youre OK???

You are assuming it isn't a vast majority when it may well be.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom