Dude, they are all drone fighters, as you are not actually in them because... Telepresence.
Give the python an SLF!
- Thread starter amadeus1171
- Start date
Dude, they are all drone fighters, as you are not actually in them because... Telepresence.
So don't install the bay on yours?
I think by drone he means suit case sized, not small car sized.
I want an SLF-launched Python.
Yep. And I'm happy to carry it with my Anaconda.
Also I want two more size 4 hardpoints for my Conda and two size 8 cargo slots.
FSD size 7...?
PLEASE!
Last edited:
![[VR] Mad Mike](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/27/27910.jpg?1553527108){kind=avatar}
i still dont think you are getting it.
whether you install it or not, having the unremovable parts of an slf bay on a ship changes how it handles...
dont believe me? as i keep saying compare the FGS to the FAS. the only major difference is the SLF bay isnt it? (please correct if i am wrong)
if SLF bays are just added to ships with no effect on handling, then that totally removes any point that the FGS has in game... it would essentially be pointless, just like it was pre SLF ability.
Looking at the FAS and FGS, Keelback and T-6 I have a bad feeling about the Krait.
I'd be lying if I said I wasn't apprehensive, too. At least the T9 -> T10 comparison is promising.
The only thing that changes how a ship handles is how they code it. The game is full of hand-wavium already, a little more doesn't bother me in the slightest. So I guess I am not getting it as you say.
I wouldn't really want an SLF on a Python. Sorry, I disagree. SLFs should be mostly in the territory of ships that can't evade damage, which the Python can, albeit not as good as others. Basically, tanks.
Now, allowing crew members to pilot one of your small ships for you at increased cost in a wing, with regular wages automatically deducted? That might be fun. It would be nice to have a sidewinder crew buddy following me around wherever I go, since I'm bad at being social. Of course, you'd lose the crew member if their ships blows up.
Now, allowing crew members to pilot one of your small ships for you at increased cost in a wing, with regular wages automatically deducted? That might be fun. It would be nice to have a sidewinder crew buddy following me around wherever I go, since I'm bad at being social. Of course, you'd lose the crew member if their ships blows up.
When was it not great?
Seriously, if you want a multirole with a fighter then buy an Anaconda or wait for the Krait.
I want a python with a fighter. I just like the feel of the interior. It's nice and comfortable and velvety. Now, if FD would allow us to change the interiors, then we'd have something there.
FD won't do this. It's too hard for them.
While there are a couple of improvements I would like on my Python, a SLF bay isn’t one of them. Should FDev in their wisdom choose to make it an option, Inwould probably not load one unless the made a lot of other unpleasant changes.
On the other hand, if I could dock a small ship (maybe limited to the smallest 3 of the small ships in an SLF bay, then I might change my mind. Although I only want that for the large ships at the moment.
On the other hand, if I could dock a small ship (maybe limited to the smallest 3 of the small ships in an SLF bay, then I might change my mind. Although I only want that for the large ships at the moment.
Last edited:
Sandro hinted that the Krait would have a strong base shield. That gives me hope that I might want to fly it outside of a Beta.
Of course this thread is still going! The people want an SLF in their python!
You're wrong. The FGS is heavier with different internals and more daka.
Yeah and I want my clipper to have 1k base shields, 2 fighter hangers, better hardpoint convergence and to fit on a medium pad. But you don't see me demanding that because I recognize it would be a ridiculous change.
Just because people want something doesn't mean they should get it, especially when it negatively effects ship balancing.