Let's see what we know from their history with the Guardians:
- Territorial
- Aggressive (unprovoked attack on Guardians)
- Plan ahead (by planing Barnacles)
sound like humans? Does to me.
Hmm. Lots of animals of different types are territorial, so personally I wouldn't say being territorial is a human characteristic. There was also a Galnet post a while back (An AEGIS report) saying that the Thargoids' concept of territory might differ significantly from our.
I think the Thargoids being aggressive with the Guardians is also debatable. I know what the logs say, but hear me out on this one... Were they being directly aggressive, or were they just responding to what quite possibly seemed to them like a hostile attack?
From the logs the Guardians had definitely occupied planets which were Thargoid. If they were just planets which the Thargoids had just picked on a star chart as theirs it would be one thing, but we know there were living Thargoid things on those planets. So that makes the Guardians' occupation of those planets appear a much more hostile act.
The level of perceived hostility could also step up drastically depending on how Barnacles fit in with the Thargoid civilisation.
So, from the logs we know that Barnacles are seeded in order to produce Meta-Alloys, and those Meta-Alloys are essential for creating Thargoid ships and Tech. We also know that the Thargoid tech is biomechanical so is living to some extent, which makes the ships living things. So if Meta-alloys are need for creating new ships, then we have a form of life-cycle - Barnacles are seeded -> Barnacles grow and produce Meta-Alloys - > Meta-Alloys are grown into ships -> (Ships continue to grow using Meta-Alloys?) -> Ships seed Barnacles.
Now, if that's correct, the actions of the Guardians would appear much more hostile as it effectively constitutes an effort to interrupt that life cycle. Similarly our actions are much more hostile than they appear to us.
Also, there's then a question of how ships (and consequently barnacles) are perceived by the Thargoid civilisation. Are they considered to be tools, or are they considered to actually be a type of Thargoid? If it's the former then it's one matter, but if the latter, then the perceived hostility of both the Guardian and our actions escalates hugely.
Tying back into the third bullet, does the seeding of Barnacles actually constitute planning ahead? Or is it an instinctive action as part of the ships' lifecycle? Animals on Earth can certainly do some pretty extreme things in preparation for reproduction but most would be difficult to constitute planning ahead.
and:
- Structures that might be spaceships
- Not sure if Thargoids are the same as their interceptors - are the interceptors alive?
- Biomachines (barnacles) for mining
- Ability to pull ships out of hyperspace
Sounds very alien. Not like humanity at all.
Funnily enough I'd classify these as more human than the previous set of stuff. The reason being that most of these are to do with technology. If we had the tech to pull ship out of hyperspace I'm fairly sure we would do it. If we could develop biological machines that could extract resources and convert them more efficiently than conventional machines then I'm fairly sure we would do it too. Similarly if we could produce something like Meta-Alloys which we could grow into spaceships and huge city-scale structure/ships wouldn't we do it?
So my point is that
some aspects of Thargoids can be very alien, while meta-concepts may be similar:
- species need resources.
- species need to protect those resources
- species want their own territory
Agreed on the first two. I think the third one depends on what counts as territory. For example, territory could be seen as something to have in it's own right. Or it could simply be just an appearance of wanting territory that derives from the first two bullets. It might also be either a permanent thing or just temporary.
But you may be right, it's all just hot air based on little - happy to listen to more theories that fit the facts we know - it's just that a lot of theories quickly go to 'and magic appears' - which is less interesting for me
Yeah, same for me ultimately!
Edit: Also happy to get critique on my theories, I'm sure there's holes.
Me too. Out of rep at the moment, so have some virtual +rep!
Edit2: One hole: Sol has no Ammonia, so why would the Thargoids be heading there unless they have an understanding of human governmental structures. Maybe they're going somewhere else...
Yeah, although with the hypothesis I put forwards, it removes the need for them to understand our governmental structures as we'll naturally draw them to the places that are most important to us / have the capability to leverage the most defenses (which makes them power centres of some kind, whether government, monarchial, theocratical, military, hive-centre, whatever really). The Ammonia Worlds throw a hole in this as well though, as there's the question of if the Thargoids are doing what I hypothesised then why only target systems with Ammonia Worlds...
A thought - what if their current actions are just laying a trail?