So, not willing to give up any numbers yet? Not like you to be coy![]()
What numbers do you want?
There are 153836408.765 pvp players in OPEN and 1 rlsg who doesnt like PvP and thinks all modes are equal.
Last edited:
So, not willing to give up any numbers yet? Not like you to be coy![]()
Why should how many people do whatever in open matter at all? Why should anyone expect that open needs to be promoted, preserved, or optimal? Why isn't your choice to play in open just the same as your choice to fly whatever ship, use prismatic or bi-weave, or to use s docking computer. If you were to decide to only fly a Cobra MkIII, should that mean, everyone should be limited to that one ship?
Your choices have consequences for just you. Not me, nor your neighbor. Just you. You, and I, get to choose from the modes. Open doesn't trump Solo. They are the same. Your determination to play in open, is your choice. You live with it. Play and let play.
What numbers do you want?
There are 153836408.765 pvp players in OPEN and 1 rlsg who doesnt like PvP and thinks all modes are equal.
Can you give any kind of evidence to back up those numbers?
(who is the 0.765 btw?)
Hardly - Salt Miners like your self are not a risk, merely an irritation or annoyance.Wut? Its relevant to the topic of risk vs reward.
What numbers do you want?
There are 153836408.765 pvp players in OPEN and 1 rlsg who doesnt like PvP and thinks all modes are equal.
I remember adrenaline rush I had while hauling CG stuff in Open right through Pirate blocade. And I remember stopping doing that after failing it once.
So current state where modes are unbalanced coupled with my rationality does not allow me to play the way I want. So this mantra does not apply here well enough.
Hardly - Salt Miners like your self are not a risk, merely an irritation or annoyance.
PvP in itself does not make Open equate to "hard mode".
Hardly - Salt Miners like your self are not a risk, merely an irritation or annoyance.
PvP in itself does not make Open equate to "hard mode".
I enjoy blockade running too, I'm grateful to those who are willing to give up their time to provide entertainment for me, and I try to be entertaining for them (preferably without getting killed).
But if you had done that run a couple of hours later after they'd all left the game, it would be as safe as solo - although you wouldn't know that until you tried. It's the players that spice things up, not the mode itself. Do you see?
Hardly - Salt Miners like your self are not a risk, merely an irritation or annoyance.
PvP in itself does not make Open equate to "hard mode".
FD are the ones who define how game modes should be considered, not salt miners like yourself
How dare you!!
All modes are equal, except Solo...
Because you know it hasn't got Wings or Multicrew...
Wait..... If there are three modes and one isn't equal... Hang on, I think I am onto something...
So All would mean all three were equal in every way... but.. hmmm one is missing some features...
OMG!!! The three modes are not the same...
ALL MODES ARE NOT EQUAL!!
You heard it here!!
Powderpanic
The Voice of Open
Consensus isn't required for a proposal, just present the pros & cons. The number of players affected could go in either column, depending on what they are. FDev know what they are, but if the numbers presented are reasonably in line with what FDev expect (assuming they even read it) they may be more likely to be swayed by the argument. If time was put in to add those figures, it could reasonably be assumed that the rest of the proposal is equally well researched and considered.
FD are the ones who define how game modes should be considered, not salt miners like yourself![]()
FD are the ones who define how game modes should be considered, not salt miners like yourself![]()
You know what they say about assuming
Powderpanic
The Voice of Griefing
And they defined it wrong to cater to bears like yourself by destroying every multiplayer content in this game. RIP Power Play.
Consensus isn't required for a proposal, just present the pros & cons. The number of players affected could go in either column, depending on what they are. FDev know what they are, but if the numbers presented are reasonably in line with what FDev expect (assuming they even read it) they may be more likely to be swayed by the argument. If time was put in to add those figures, it could reasonably be assumed that the rest of the proposal is equally well researched and considered.
Whether PvE or PvP I would not fly a shieldless ship - especially not a T7.Holy. Cow.
Take a shieldess T7 and go to the cg system.
Fly in SC for 3 days in open than 3 days in solo. Compare rebuys.
Whether PvE or PvP I would not fly a shieldless ship - especially not a T7.
If you can get away with a shield-less min-maxed sheep build in Solo/PG mode then good for you.