Not theorycrafting, merely guessing and wondering HOW they will do it.
As usual , the SC "progress" schedule keeps "pace" with ED , often just slightly preceding an x.x update hoping for some subconscious influence relating to Beyond's 3.x numbers. Behold, Star Citizen's just "released" "3.2" mining!
And criticism of a game isn't vilification. <snip>
He isnt talking about criticizing the game, but the gamers. Which is not only vilification in an absurdly vitriolic way in this topic, but also wildly off-topic for a thread that is supposedly about discussing the game Star Citizen. Maybe Yaffle can clarify whether this topic is for discussing the game Star Citizen or for craptalking (members of) another community of gamers. Just my opinion, but I'd appreciate if those kind of personal stuff could be left to the SA boards or something and we could keep the FD forums to discussing games, either released or in development.
Let's be absolutely clear here: we are talking critically about a game here. This critique is met by death threats. Criticising the “gamers” who do so IS ABSOLUTELY NOT — in any way, shape or form — “vilification” or “vitriolic.” What it is, is quite simply, unquestionably, objectively right. If you think otherwise, you are flat out wrong.
So talking about the game in any critical sense leads to threats/abuse, and talking about the source of those threats/abuse is "vilification".
I will take the greatest of pleasure watching this failed project sliding into the abyss over the coming weeks and months and make no apologies for it.
You'd prefer to see 1M+ backers lose their money and any hope for a decent game. Nice.
Or, to put it a different way from milligna, I rather think Cobra believes that’s already happened.Yes, you've made yourself clear. You hate SC. You'd prefer to see 1M+ backers lose their money and any hope for a decent game. Nice.
I note sleutelbos also posted examples from a SC forum - zero threats, 100% upvotes. So yes, please go and do your statistical research to prove the entire SC online community should be vilified in the way you have done.
I can't help but feel that if people are taking that sort of hyperbole as literal then they are either looking to be offended or they shouldn't even be using the damn internet. No one would think that a comment like that covers every single backer of the game, that would just be ludicrous.
I play a bit of EVE from time to time and that game has a rather notorious reputation amongst the media and other gamers, a reputation most certainly applies to some people who play it, but it also does not apply in any way, shape or form to a huge amount of people that also play it. I would laugh at a fellow EVE player if they started frequenting forums trying to claim that generalising is uncalled for, it's just part of the hyperbole that people use on the internet.
And there are lots of examples where the opposite is true. Just because there is a situation where X doesn't happen doesn't mean the adverse is not true.
I regularly get dog-piled when I post on the subreddit, I'm not rude or offensive to people, I don't use hyperbole but I do question things and sometimes (quite often in SC's case) that is not appreciated because it ruins the 'feel good' herd mentality thought process that pervades places like reddit.
You'd prefer to see 1M+ backers lose their money and any hope for a decent game. Nice.
Personally i don't think there is an icecube's chance in hell of CIG shipping what they have hyped for years. At this point even a "decent game" is to my mind a big IF. At this point, i think just shipping something half playable half fun before the funds dry up will be a miracle.
On the bright side, if things go belly up, someone somewhere will make a killing selling CR effigies to burn.
Or, to put it a different way from milligna, I rather think Cobra believes that’s already happened.
I can't help but feel that if people are taking that sort of hyperbole as literal then they are either looking to be offended or they shouldn't even be using the damn internet. No one would think that a comment like that covers every single backer of the game, that would just be ludicrous.
Some people in this forum have repeatedly said they want SC to fail as badly as possible. They cant wait to tell 'them' that 'they were wrong'. It is about vindication, days of reckoning and such healthy and sane stuff. It has little to do with 'neutral bystanders casually observing just another game.' Some people are really emotionally invested in Star Citizen, either positively or negatively. I find both types rather scary, to be honest.
Some people in this forum have repeatedly said they want SC to fail as badly as possible. They cant wait to tell 'them' that 'they were wrong'. It is about vindication, days of reckoning and such healthy and sane stuff. It has little to do with 'neutral bystanders casually observing just another game.' Some people are really emotionally invested in Star Citizen, either positively or negatively. I find both types rather scary, to be honest.
I personally are more concerned with the implications this could have on crowdfunding should Star Citizen go down the drain. True some Kickstarters are pure scams, but it did give us a lot of games that would never had seen the light of day otherwise. So in that regard at least I'm rooting for SC to deliver something final. But it is hard not to see the cracks in the facade when they present basically the same thing every year telling us that it's coming soon.
Nah. There have been a few people, but this is an unfair mischaracterisation.
Right, so when a bunch of people tell people 'you dont understand game development' it is perfectly normal to sulk away, request a ban and pay real money to get access to a safe forum where such horrible things aren't uttered. All while repeatedly lamenting the horror of people once accusing him of not understanding game development, while saying he cant wait to show them that they dont understand game development. But if people post on an almost daily basis 'the community is a toxic evil cult' that is just 'haha hyperbole, wy u so erious?!!?".
When one SC member posts a death threat some here go on and on for pages about how terribly murderous the community is, how sick of a cult etc. When a bunch of ED players send death threats and try to doxx multiple fellow community members its the usual 'yeah, you always have bad apples.' while on the very same page chastising the SC community for 'not standing against the bad apples'. Recently some dudes pointed and laughed at a fellow community member here because his house burned down. In real life. Bad apples, I guess.
Its so blatantly obvious: everything wrong in community you are part of? Bad apples. The other community? "SEE THEY ARE EVIL CULT TOXIC TERRIBLE RAAAAAARRRRR!". Its a shame. Because in an ideal world people would stand up to bizarre crap such as the above regardless of community, and would leave people who just like other games alone already. Even if you think they look funny, or speak funny, or you disagree about the game. And unfortunatrly this topic is frequented by a few people so blinded with anger and frustration they cant just bring them to adhere to these basic guidelines of normal behavior.![]()
Right, so when a bunch of people tell people 'you dont understand game development' it is perfectly normal to sulk away, request a ban and pay real money to get access to a safe forum where such horrible things aren't uttered. All while repeatedly lamenting the horror of people once accusing him of not understanding game development, while saying he cant wait to show them that they dont understand game development. But if people post on an almost daily basis 'the community is a toxic evil cult' that is just 'haha hyperbole, wy u so erious?!!?".
When one SC member posts a death threat some here go on and on for pages about how terribly murderous the community is, how sick of a cult etc. When a bunch of ED players send death threats and try to doxx multiple fellow community members its the usual 'yeah, you always have bad apples.' while on the very same page chastising the SC community for 'not standing against the bad apples'. Recently some dudes pointed and laughed at a fellow community member here because his house burned down. In real life. Bad apples, I guess.
Its so blatantly obvious: everything wrong in community you are part of? Bad apples. The other community? "SEE THEY ARE EVIL CULT TOXIC TERRIBLE RAAAAAARRRRR!". Its a shame. Because in an ideal world people would stand up to bizarre crap such as the above regardless of community, and would leave people who just like other games alone already. Even if you think they look funny, or speak funny, or you disagree about the game. And unfortunatrly this topic is frequented by a few people so blinded with anger and frustration they cant just bring them to adhere to these basic guidelines of normal behavior.![]()