Games changed maynard. New things were added. Rules should and WILL be adjusted around it.
The game then doesnt have what we have now.
No the game hasn't changed. You want it to change for you own purposes though.
Games changed maynard. New things were added. Rules should and WILL be adjusted around it.
The game then doesnt have what we have now.
Well screw it, as arguments are the only thing this forum ever has seemed to grasp.
BGS effects more than just your immediate game, it's PvE right up until the point where it starts effecting other people's game, then, I'm afraid kiddos, it becomes a PvP activity.
Hence why people don't like the idea of people not being out in visible veiw doing what they do.
Let's be honest here, considering the vast number of people who are utterly phobic of social interation in an online game, do you really think you stand to be blasted out the sky every two seconds by your fellow PvEers? Because you won't. Why? Because they think like you.
And as for the threat of PvPers.. They are hugely the minority, if there is more people populating open play, the odds of you even being targeted drop SIGNIFICANTLY.
Anything that has the potential to effect anyone else's game, should be mode locked to open play. Why? Because it is NOT a one man band activity.
It's that simple.
I really wish FDev would stop worrying about what thir player base will do in spite, and just make the damn move already.
Games changed maynard. New things were added. Rules should and WILL be adjusted around it.
The game then doesnt have what we have now.
What? I literally said his actions should only affect him and no one else. Lay off the pipe.
No the game hasn't changed. You want it to change for you own purposes though.
Games changed maynard. New things were added. Rules should and WILL be adjusted around it.
The game then doesnt have what we have now.
You said, and I quote: "You can not buy it. If you are affecting another group of people intentionally, taking away their system. ITs PVP Robert."
And since what you were referring to can happen in any mode then you've just admitted that PVP is multi-mode.
Do keep up at the back.
I mean pull a straw argument out of youd like. Whatever floats your boat.
Its literally changing under your guys feet. And you guys cant see it.
Its literally changing under your guys feet. And you guys cant see it.
Ask yourself why the new crime and punishment doesnt make sense. Then go do some BGS activities against another open only BGSEr. Watch it work perfectly.
And when your mind gets blown. Come back and give T90k a hug. I like hugs.
Games do indeed change - as this one already has and, I expect, continue to.
Whether a subset of the player-base will be successful in their desire to remove access to existing content from another subset of the player-base remains to be seen - especially in light of Sandro's quite clear statements on the fact that Open Only is only being considered for Powerplay.
Then campaign for the removal of PMFs.
That'll fix all of the issues you're complaining about whilst affecting the smallest number of people.
I would vote for that.
Me too. It seems that in some cases a PMF gives certain players a vastly inflated sense of their own importance.
No if they are going to give player factions minor factions to play with. Then they need to support the gameplay that comes with it.
I would vote for that.
I would vote for that.
Me too. It seems that in some cases a PMF gives certain players a vastly inflated sense of their own importance.
Or take them away as a failed mechanic.
You're ok with taking stuff away from players, right?
Yes. I am.
Sorted then. Let's get in touch with Frontier and heavily suggest that PMFs just aren't working out.
I would vote for that.
Me too. It seems that in some cases a PMF gives certain players a vastly inflated sense of their own importance.
Me too. I hate PMF's.
I'd support it too (and my group has a PMF)
(This thread isn't locked yet? wow...)
Go for it. By all means. See how that works out for you![]()