They're going to get a new one.The problem is that Activision as a company lost interest in their "loyal audience", I think.
That's the reason why for console platform owners it's important to have titles exclusive to their platforms. They're necessary for the survival of these platforms.If you were a company and had a choice between developing an AAA title for 500 million dollars with a proposition of it generating a 1 billion in the first year, or outsourcing and re-skinning a mobile game for 30 million, going to Asian market and generating 500 million revenue every month, what would you do?
We, as a PC and console gamers, are screwed. We are simply not worth it, to the big houses. That's where the game monetization came to.
Making money. That's all any company really cares of.Wow. Blizzard. What the hell are you doing.
Making money. That's all any company really cares of.
According to CNBC, the share price decline is attributed to a reported drop in the consumer base: a 10% reduction in subscribers. Not to the PR debacle, which is coincidentally timed.
It seems plausible. Large scale investors or funds won't be interested in the company in the same way as gamers. However it's hard to see more people signing up because of their plans.
The share price remains at $55 down from $67 at this time.
That's actually quite a nice metaphore.
The problem is that Activision as a company lost interest in their "loyal audience", I think. If you were a company and had a choice between developing an AAA title for 500 million dollars with a proposition of it generating a 1 billion in the first year, or outsourcing and re-skinning a mobile game for 30 million, going to Asian market and generating 500 million revenue every month, what would you do?
We, as a PC and console gamers, are screwed. We are simply not worth it, to the big houses. That's where the game monetization came to.
As in example of Diablo, it is perfect one. There won't be Diablo 4. There are just nowhere to go creatively. Blizzard knows this perfectly well. For these players, it is just time to move on.
Commodore *actively* killed the Amiga. There are good stories to be heard from David Pleasance on that (all can be found on YT). And yeah at its apogee it was quite ahead of the competition, hell Win95 as a piece of garbage compared to what AmigaOS was able to do 5 years before. So the situation in that case was a bit special and cannot be compared...Commodore and VGA killed the Amiga imho, not EA or anyone else. Had it not become an obsolete platform technologically, it'd have stood a chance, but since Commodore didn't plan ahead, they found themselves lagging behind.
So true. How did that mobile card game go for Lord British ? haha. They are entering a shark filled pond, anything can happen. If they crash and burn, we can go "HA HA !" and point at them and laugh.Yeah, it's a strange phenomenon. Every company that goes for the big, juicy, lucrative market imagines they'll be the champ that dominates it and makes all the money. Just ask Bioware how well that worked out for them.
So true. How did that mobile card game go for Lord British ? haha.
I'm not following closely but if i can recall it was before the thing of the avatar scam.Say what?! I must have missed his latest venture. I'd have thought that after Scams of the Avatar he was a proven busted flush and would have the decency to hide in shame...
I'm not following closely but if i can recall it was before the thing of the avatar scam.
So true. How did that mobile card game go for Lord British ? haha. They are entering a shark filled pond, anything can happen. If they crash and burn, we can go "HA HA !" and point at them and laugh.