Gene Roddenberry talked about it in 1964, Asimov talked about it in 1942... at least they didn't pretend they weren't making it up!Bob Lazaar talked about this in 1985 its great to see mainstream science ripping him off now![]()
Lazaar is a nutter.
Gene Roddenberry talked about it in 1964, Asimov talked about it in 1942... at least they didn't pretend they weren't making it up!Bob Lazaar talked about this in 1985 its great to see mainstream science ripping him off now![]()
I posted this already but it was put in as a duplicate of this thread so I'm pasting it here again:
There is a great video and link to images of a ship they want to build for testing a Alcubierre drive, which is what the Hyperdrive and Supercruise I believe are based on. Video is about an hour, lots of science.
http://io9.com/heres-nasas-new-design-for-a-warp-drive-ship-1588948192
I'd love to see some of these in ED For example you could find a colony 400ly out, and if you land on the planet you can see something like their power station is built around it because it has a nuclear drive and 400ly only took them two weeks.
http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2014/06/nasa-unveils-concept-warp-drive-interstellar-spaceship/
There's another article on this concept ship (Dr Harold White) here. Some more concept stuff.
Another new article here too:
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternativ...o-news-ufo-sightings-and-roswell-2975276.html
For anyone that's really (really) interested in this stuff, there's a google book on Field propulsion systems:
http://books.google.co.uk/books/abo...Space_Travel.html?id=o_Ik1gpacgYC&redir_esc=y
I must admit, I've not read it all myself (just skimmed it) but there's some theoretical stuff there on stuff relevent to this thread. (Click on Chapter 01 etc, it's not clear you have to do this).
Edit: Just noticed, this is just an extract from the book (you'd have to buy it) - there's loads of pages missing. Still might be of interest to someone though.
I have a working theory for FTL travel too, and much like this plan, it also runs on Unicorn Sh.. I mean "exotic matter" sorry.
I suspect time travel will be theoretically easier than warp drive space travel. If you think about time as just another dimension of space, manipulating only one dimension should be easier than manipulating all 3-4 (or more) of them.
Of course, there are small practical difficulties. If you send human through time, the atoms in his body will arrive into space that will be occupied by other atoms, overcoming repulsive forces and triggering fusion process. Basically, you'll get human sized fusion bomb. But no worries, just a minor technical inconvenience!
Hmm but if most of space is just empty and everything in space is moving, e.g. the planet your 'crash test dummy' is on is spinning around it's axis, in an orbit around it's star in an orbit around it's galactic core which is whizzing through space, moving in time without moving in space is more likely to dump you into a big bit of empty space.
Apparently you're moving at about 1.3 million miles per hour (2.1 million km/hr) using the universe as a frame of reference. We are all faster than a speeding bullet, even sitting down! link
So if someone says, "Hey want to test my new time machine?", probably best to ask how fast it goes.
I feel a VoiceAttack! command coming on.
As the saying goes, the effectiveness of a technology for propulsion is proportional to its effectiveness as a weapon.![]()
Bob Lazaar talked about this in 1985 its great to see mainstream science ripping him off now
Explains exactly how it work, 'All' you would need is some anti-matter, not an energy source the size of jupiter (what??!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJolFbj8nc4&index=90&list=PLCF49ADB83526952B
All of this is very much at the theoretical stage at the moment