To be fair that's true of every community ever.What I learned at this community is that it is impossible to please everyone.
Anything somebody will change or propose will be opposed by some group.
To be fair that's true of every community ever.What I learned at this community is that it is impossible to please everyone.
Anything somebody will change or propose will be opposed by some group.
It is compared to an engineered one. Engineering does nothing to redeem ships in the areas where they fall short. As engineering is based on percentages it only widens any existing gaps between different ships.
There's the best tool for the job, but then there's hammering in nails with a broken tool handle. The MkIV doesn't do anything particularly well and it's not as fun to throw around as its older sibling as a jack-of-all-trades. For instance an FDL may not have the raw shields and armor or damage output of a Corvette but they're still quite high, as well as being very fast and maneuverable. Its attributes leverage each other and that makes it also great for an activity like bounty hunting. Different, but not worse. I'd like to be able to say something similar of the MkIV one day.
I'm not a fan of the T-10 either as it's billed as an AX ship while being pretty mediocre at it, and its brand of facetanking isn't a very exciting way to fight Thargoids, nor does its speed or driftiness lend it very well to AX support with objectives like timely delivery of decon limpets in a wing. I certainly wouldn't use a one for core mining, for exactly the same reason as the MkIV is undesirable. I would use a Type-9 for laser mining because there isn't much travel involved and it has the beefcake cargo hold.
You clearly have a soft spot for for the underdog but I don't believe it's a popular opinion.
I have tried it, mainly for mining in fact as that was the thing that it looked like it was suitable for. A T-6 still fit the bill better and was more pleasant to use. Combat in it was mainly reversing in FAoff even fully engineered because it doesn't really have a choice.Have you actually tried it? If not, get one, engineer it, give it a go. You might be pleasantly surprised.
I have tried it, mainly for mining in fact as that was the thing that it looked like it was suitable for. A T-6 still fit the bill better and was more pleasant to use.
But if they made it available as you suggest, the other group of players would then presumably be victims of mis-selling.I certainly have. It's a solid line of argument, and a reasonable position to take - especially if seeking a refund (if the Cobra MKIV is not made available). Otherwise, Frontier need to make clear on their website that the Cobra MKIV is not available to new players. As things currently stand, they are using the Cobra MKIV as a selling point - even listing the purchase price of the ship - thereby implying that if you buy the game, this ship is available to you and that's the in-game price you'd pay (clearly misleading if it's not available to the player/customer after purchase).![]()
Before 3.3. Sorry if that wasn't clear.You managed to fit a seismic charge launcher on a T6? How? Can you please teach me?
I have tried it, mainly for mining in fact as that was the thing that it looked like it was suitable for. A T-6 still fit the bill better and was more pleasant to use. Combat in it was mainly reversing in FAoff even fully engineered because it doesn't really have a choice.
It can do cores now that those a thing and the size has some merit for that but asteroids are huge and likes of asps, kraits & pythons aren't really impeded by their size. That said I'll use a Clipper for cores because the search is the boring part and its maneuverability puts smaller ships to shame.
You can earn rank and gain access to the ships that are locked. There's nothing a new player can do (besides complain in the way I described earlier - or something similar) to unlock the Cobra MKIV and gain access to it...![]()
Another way FDev could have done the Cobra Mk4 thingie.... or any other "exclusive ship" for early backers/ LEPs is to let them have so called "early access" to a particular ship for the first year or so. After a year, that ship becomes public access.
At least this is a middle ground.
I certainly have. It's a solid line of argument, and a reasonable position to take - especially if seeking a refund (if the Cobra MKIV is not made available). Otherwise, Frontier need to make clear on their website that the Cobra MKIV is not available to new players. As things currently stand, they are using the Cobra MKIV as a selling point - even listing the purchase price of the ship - thereby implying that if you buy the game, this ship is available to you and that's the in-game price you'd pay (clearly misleading if it's not available to the player/customer after purchase).![]()
I agree with PS4 players that preordered getting it. But if you didn't preorder, tough.
Yeah that distinction is arbitrary and pretty irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. A T6 is comparable in overall size (taller and longer, but also thinner with no wings), it handles better, is faster and can still land on outposts all for about the same price outfitted.Type 6 is not a small shipI did say small ship.
Yeah that distinction is arbitrary and pretty irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. A T6 is comparable in overall size (taller and longer, but also thinner with no wings), it handles better, is faster and can still land on outposts all for about the same price outfitted.
Just so, and likewise, I get my small ship kicks with different specs. Neither here nor there though, you know. It is what it is. The call to free the ship is kind of disrespectful of the terms of sale in which it was made in the first place. Not saying that's inherently a bad thing, but there are quire relevant connotations with these sort of things.fair enough, i'd still rather use a CM4![]()
Just so, and likewise, I get my small ship kicks with different specs. Neither here nor there though, you know. It is what it is. The call to free the ship is kind of disrespectful of the terms of sale in which it was made in the first place. Not saying that's inherently a bad thing, but there are quire relevant connotations with these sort of things.